- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Arizona Election Workers are Running Ultra-Violet Ballot Testing on Maricopa Ballots
Posted on 4/25/21 at 11:17 am
Posted on 4/25/21 at 11:17 am
Deep forensic
Inventor and data analyst Jovan Hutton Pulitzer has a process and the patents surrounding the process where he can identify fraudulent ballots based on the paper used, creases in the paper, the ink on the forms, and other characteristics. Pulitzer can identify fraudulent votes, which will ultimately result in the accurate results of the 2020 election when only valid votes are accounted for.
LINK
Inventor and data analyst Jovan Hutton Pulitzer has a process and the patents surrounding the process where he can identify fraudulent ballots based on the paper used, creases in the paper, the ink on the forms, and other characteristics. Pulitzer can identify fraudulent votes, which will ultimately result in the accurate results of the 2020 election when only valid votes are accounted for.
LINK
Posted on 4/25/21 at 11:19 am to Jjdoc
If he can flip the election back to Trump I would nominate him for the Pulitzer Prize.
Posted on 4/25/21 at 11:20 am to Jjdoc
Umm, Nov. 4th 2020 would have been a fantastic time for this to have been revealed.
Not late April , 2021.
Not late April , 2021.
Posted on 4/25/21 at 11:22 am to Jjdoc
I think someone post this process from the live feed, thinking it was for the speculative “Watermark “. Think it’s just this process......
Posted on 4/25/21 at 11:22 am to AURaptor
quote:
Umm, Nov. 4th 2020 would have been a fantastic time for this to have been revealed.
UMMMM... we have to know. period.
Posted on 4/25/21 at 11:23 am to tigersbb
quote:Maybe he can get back 1960 for Nixon
If he can flip the election back to Trump I would nominate him for the Pulitzer Prize
Posted on 4/25/21 at 11:24 am to Jjdoc
Very interesting info, highly doubt they would bother to crease them, who would have thought they would look for something that simple eh?
Posted on 4/25/21 at 11:27 am to trinidadtiger
I think this is more so to identify where the ballots came from.
Were they printed illegally in a foreign country...etc
Were they printed illegally in a foreign country...etc
This post was edited on 4/25/21 at 11:29 am
Posted on 4/25/21 at 11:31 am to Jjdoc
Well, if you want ridiculous results that no judge would ever recognize as valid, use some unproven method invented by Mr. Cue Cat.
Posted on 4/25/21 at 11:32 am to Jjdoc
If that water ballot marking thing comes true it will be goat
Posted on 4/25/21 at 11:32 am to Jjdoc
I have done a little internet research on this and I believe the UV light is for the following:
-Makes creases on mail in ballots more visible. If a mail-in ballot doesn't have fold creases it never was placed in an outer envelope and dropped off/mailed. Even if you dropped off your ballot in one of the famous boxes it had to be folded and placed in an outer envelope.
-It is my understanding there are some specific types of paper and ink used in the commercial printing process that have flecks that are visible when placed under UV light. Much different than publicly available copy paper or inks. I'm not saying reports of some type of "special paper" being engineered from the start but just a difference in commercial printing and duplicating methods that are detectable under this type of forensic analysis.
-I hope they are able to conclusively prove what we all know to be true.
-Makes creases on mail in ballots more visible. If a mail-in ballot doesn't have fold creases it never was placed in an outer envelope and dropped off/mailed. Even if you dropped off your ballot in one of the famous boxes it had to be folded and placed in an outer envelope.
-It is my understanding there are some specific types of paper and ink used in the commercial printing process that have flecks that are visible when placed under UV light. Much different than publicly available copy paper or inks. I'm not saying reports of some type of "special paper" being engineered from the start but just a difference in commercial printing and duplicating methods that are detectable under this type of forensic analysis.
-I hope they are able to conclusively prove what we all know to be true.
Posted on 4/25/21 at 11:33 am to AURaptor
quote:
Umm, Nov. 4th 2020 would have been a fantastic time for this to have been revealed. Not late April , 2021.
I will just be thrilled with the revelation of any serious fraud, manipulation, or tampering. Especially after all the Lib nation has repeatedly denied this again and again. (Like they really know).
Posted on 4/25/21 at 11:34 am to AURaptor
quote:
Umm, Nov. 4th 2020 would have been a fantastic time for this to have been revealed.
I like that there could be a whole lot of people caught in a trap.
Posted on 4/25/21 at 11:35 am to Jjdoc
Weren't all the mailed out ballots official?? - supplied by the SecState?? = wouldn't they all have the proper provenance of legitimacy?? -- and some of those run there numerous times??
They need to be able to match up each ballot with a real human being that can be identified. === tall order.
Glad to see something being done, but I am pessimistic to the core - unless they can validate the registration base and check off each ballot wrt a legitimately registered citizen.
They need to be able to match up each ballot with a real human being that can be identified. === tall order.
Glad to see something being done, but I am pessimistic to the core - unless they can validate the registration base and check off each ballot wrt a legitimately registered citizen.
Posted on 4/25/21 at 11:42 am to mmcgrath
quote:
Well, if you want ridiculous results that no judge would ever recognize as valid, use some unproven method invented by Mr. Cue Cat.
Except that it is proven.
Our own Intelligence agencies use some of the same tech to identify.
Posted on 4/25/21 at 11:45 am to mmcgrath
quote:
Well, if you want ridiculous results that no judge would ever recognize as valid, use some unproven method invented by Mr. Cue Cat.
Worried about something?
Posted on 4/25/21 at 11:48 am to Jjdoc
Yes, we have to know, but I'm so tired of this same con game the Left uses.
Going back to primarily Bill and Hillary, who were masters at this chit. Same with Obama , and now this admin.
Commit overtly illegal , immoral acts. Pretend it didn't happen. Delay. Accuse Republicans ( or rivals ) of having done it. Stall. Mock anyone who tries to bring up and question the issue. Deflect. Gets friends in news media and entertainment world to ignore the issue. Delay. Gets said friends to mock and ridicule anyone who tries to bring up the issue. Obfuscate.
Then we get the 'objective' pundits or RINO talking heads who play their part as they pretend 'both sides do it ', and offer up childish ' yeah, but ... ' retorts, as they then try to make this a 'societal ' issue, to further obscure the fact that 'somebody did something...
Bottom line, we can ' discover ' that the election was in deed hacked, Joe cheated, and then .... absolutely nothing will happen. Just like with Comey and Hillary's e-mails, Joe bragging about Ukraine, the tarmac meeting between Bill and Loretta... the brazen cockiness of the Left doing what ever the frick it wants, because they KNOW they'll get away with ____________ ( fill in the blank )
Going back to primarily Bill and Hillary, who were masters at this chit. Same with Obama , and now this admin.
Commit overtly illegal , immoral acts. Pretend it didn't happen. Delay. Accuse Republicans ( or rivals ) of having done it. Stall. Mock anyone who tries to bring up and question the issue. Deflect. Gets friends in news media and entertainment world to ignore the issue. Delay. Gets said friends to mock and ridicule anyone who tries to bring up the issue. Obfuscate.
Then we get the 'objective' pundits or RINO talking heads who play their part as they pretend 'both sides do it ', and offer up childish ' yeah, but ... ' retorts, as they then try to make this a 'societal ' issue, to further obscure the fact that 'somebody did something...
Bottom line, we can ' discover ' that the election was in deed hacked, Joe cheated, and then .... absolutely nothing will happen. Just like with Comey and Hillary's e-mails, Joe bragging about Ukraine, the tarmac meeting between Bill and Loretta... the brazen cockiness of the Left doing what ever the frick it wants, because they KNOW they'll get away with ____________ ( fill in the blank )
This post was edited on 4/25/21 at 11:49 am
Posted on 4/25/21 at 11:49 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
Weren't all the mailed out ballots official?? - supplied by the SecState?? = wouldn't they all have the proper provenance of legitimacy?? -- and some of those run there numerous times??
If I was running a ballot stuffing operation, and I controlled the county, I would just order extra ballots from the vendor.
No need to fake anything.
This post was edited on 4/25/21 at 1:21 pm
Posted on 4/25/21 at 11:51 am to Jjdoc
if the fraud is found, nothing will happen other than a bunch of LEFT MSM reporting to flip the narrative....
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News