- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Another day of the GOP lawyer lobbing softballs to Schiff's witnesses
Posted on 11/19/19 at 4:19 pm
Posted on 11/19/19 at 4:19 pm
I can't recall a ANY ex-girlfriend give me one single minute of an interrogation this freakin soft.
9
Posted on 11/19/19 at 4:32 pm to Buckeye Jeaux
quote:
Another day of the GOP lawyer lobbing softballs to Schiff's witnesses
With what they are answering:
"No quid pro quo, no bribery, Trump wanted to make sure Ukraine was not corrupt before giving the money, Zelensky wasn't concerned or feeling pressure, Trump wanted Europe to pay more-it's in their backyard, etc..."
No need for him to go hard. They are making the case FOR Trump. He did nothing wrong. Dems are making up outrage.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 4:48 pm to Cali 4 LSU
True. Especially given the purported situation in the closed door "depositions" ruled by strict Democrat guidelines. So as it goes, Republicans were disallowed from freely asking questions, the opposite being the case for Democrats.
Thus, now for the Republicans, the old but absolutely true adage applies: DO NOT ask a question for which you don't already know the answer.
**Dems have the advantage of already having tested all their questions and for the most part know the answers they would receive.
Thus, now for the Republicans, the old but absolutely true adage applies: DO NOT ask a question for which you don't already know the answer.
**Dems have the advantage of already having tested all their questions and for the most part know the answers they would receive.
This post was edited on 11/19/19 at 4:50 pm
Posted on 11/19/19 at 4:49 pm to Buckeye Jeaux
Each witness needs just one question:
"What high crime or misdemeanor did you witness the President committing or have evidence of him committing?"
"What high crime or misdemeanor did you witness the President committing or have evidence of him committing?"
Posted on 11/19/19 at 4:50 pm to Buckeye Jeaux
Give the guy a break. Its gotta be hard to get hyped up when you know your client is a guilty POS.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 4:50 pm to timdonaghyswhistle
quote:
Each witness needs just one question:
"What high crime or misdemeanor did you witness the President committing or have evidence of him committing?"
Why do that when instead you can catch witnesses and Schiff with their pants down by careful questioning and establishment of facts?
I mean the whole Vindman/Schiff fiasco today is the whole point.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 4:51 pm to Centinel
A montage of them all stumbling over this question would be pretty effective I think.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 4:51 pm to Buckeye Jeaux
The sham is destroyed. He is leading them where he wants them to go.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 4:52 pm to timdonaghyswhistle
quote:
A montage of them all stumbling over this question would be pretty effective I think.
But they already have that.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 4:54 pm to Buckeye Jeaux
He isn’t going for “booms”. He has been poking holes in the narrative, showing bias and discrediting. Basically death by a thousand cuts. He’s good at that. The reps like JJ bring the booms.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 5:03 pm to bstew3006
quote:
The reps like JJ bring the booms.
Hell he was brought on the committee just to bring the boom.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 5:07 pm to Buckeye Jeaux
He reminds me of Toby Flenderson.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 5:14 pm to Buckeye Jeaux
You dont go after active duty. It's a bad visual. You let him have his say, then let the pundits tear him apart.
None of this will ever amount to anything anyway.
None of this will ever amount to anything anyway.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 5:18 pm to Port Royal
quote:
You dont go after active duty. It's a bad visual.
The only bad visual this afternoon was Vindman's responses. From the obvious butthurt of people not doing what he said, to correcting Nunes about calling him by his rank, to his obviously political bias as reported by his peers and subordinates on multiple occasions.
He's an overtly biased officer who thinks far too much of himself. He is the polar opposite of what an officer should be.
This post was edited on 11/19/19 at 5:19 pm
Posted on 11/19/19 at 5:20 pm to Centinel
quote:
You dont go after active duty
Lt. Colonel Oliver North says hello.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 5:24 pm to AUbused
quote:
Give the guy a break. Its gotta be hard to get hyped up when you know your client is a guilty POS.
How is Nunes guilty of something? What laws did he break?
Posted on 11/19/19 at 5:25 pm to Buckeye Jeaux
I listened to him question someone, not sure who as I was listening on the radio, and all of the answers to the questions basically said that there is nothing there. There was no quid pro quo, no bribery, no extortion, there were meetings with the Ukranian president where corruption wasn't even mentioned. It was a gathering of facts and those facts simply discredit every narrative the Dems have pushed.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 5:27 pm to Port Royal
Nobody for Trump is changing their minds.
Nobody against Trump is either.
The question - who the hell are these people who walk around "undecided" in this political climate?
Nobody against Trump is either.
The question - who the hell are these people who walk around "undecided" in this political climate?
Posted on 11/19/19 at 5:29 pm to SOKAL
quote:
The question - who the hell are these people who walk around "undecided" in this political climate?
Probably not paying much attention at all.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 5:32 pm to timdonaghyswhistle
quote:
Lt. Colonel Oliver North says hello.
And the Democrats turned North into a sympathetic figure, when he was just a nobody assigned to the NSC.
Joe and Suzy Stupid will do the same thing with Vindman, after CNN tells them what to think.
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News