Started By
Message
locked post

Ancient Stone Carvings-Comet(s) Hitting Earth app.10,950 BC (p14, Shermer concedes...)

Posted on 4/22/17 at 9:48 pm
Posted by ThinePreparedAni
In a sea of cognitive dissonance
Member since Mar 2013
11089 posts
Posted on 4/22/17 at 9:48 pm
Changed link due to concerns reported with prior site

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/04/21/ancient-stone-carvings-confirm-comet-struck-earth-10950bc-wiping/

quote:

Ancient stone carvings confirm how comet struck Earth in 10,950BC, sparking the rise of civilisations



quote:

Ancient Stone Carvings Show a Comet Swarm Hitting Earth Around 10,950 BCE Around the time civilisation changed forever.

FIONA MACDONALD 22 APR 2017


quote:

Researchers have translated famous ancient symbols in a temple in Turkey, and they tell the story of a devastating comet impact more than 13,000 years ago.


quote:

"I think this research, along with the recent finding of a widespread platinum anomaly across the North American continent virtually seal the case in favour of [a Younger Dryas comet impact]," lead researcher Martin Sweatman told Sarah Knapton from The Telegraph.


quote:

The dating of these carvings also matches an ice core taken from Greenland, which pinpoints the Younger Dryas period as beginning around 10,890 BCE .


This post was edited on 3/24/20 at 1:58 pm
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164034 posts
Posted on 4/22/17 at 9:49 pm to
quote:

10,950 BCE

Interesting how the Common Era just so happens to start when Jesus was born.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69248 posts
Posted on 4/22/17 at 9:50 pm to
Seems consistent with the theory that mankind was in the ancient ancient past extremely advanced before natural calamities sent us back to the Stone Age

Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
64952 posts
Posted on 4/22/17 at 9:52 pm to
quote:

Interesting how the Common Era just so happens to start when Jesus was born.



Yeah...I don't understand why they do this BCE and CE bullshite. We all know what it means.
Posted by Esquire
Chiraq
Member since Apr 2014
11570 posts
Posted on 4/22/17 at 9:53 pm to
They needed Willis and Affleck.
This post was edited on 4/22/17 at 9:54 pm
Posted by AZTarheeel
Member since Feb 2015
3702 posts
Posted on 4/22/17 at 9:54 pm to
I've never heard of that before now. Is it the PC way of saying BC?
Posted by Purple Spoon
Hoth
Member since Feb 2005
17766 posts
Posted on 4/22/17 at 9:57 pm to
Seems like those scientists are taking a lot of liberties in forming their theory.
Posted by ThinePreparedAni
In a sea of cognitive dissonance
Member since Mar 2013
11089 posts
Posted on 4/22/17 at 10:00 pm to
quote:

Seems like those scientists are taking a lot of liberties in forming their theory.


Reference my post history over the last few months if you want more background.....

I posted this in a different thread. Slightly off topic, but it conveys the info. To be clear,
different impact events are illustrated below...

Tip of iceberg....

Keep in mind that the guy below has been accused of being a "climate change denier" by the true believers


That statement / position alone is pretty telling about the motivations of the current political movement (gradualists, uniformitarians...). There is no search for knowledge or truth from these folks. Some folks just want to be "right" to drive policy/funding/agendas...

quote:

While this knowledge is, at present, within the purview of a small but growing number of catastrophist geologists, astronomers, and other scientists, it has fallen completely by the wayside in the public discourse. For the present time politics dominates the discussion of global change, and there is a powerful political incentive to direct the discussion towards anthropogenic forcing to the exclusion of natural forces of change, for human behavior is subject to political control and natural forces of global change are not


Randall proposes cataclysmic cosmic impacts as the source of radical changes to the earth and part of cyclical process that is downplayed by mainstream science


LINK

quote:

An open letter to a critic on the matter of chevrons, megatsunamis and bolide impacts.
by Randall Carlson



quote:

I am addressing this response to one issue raised regarding remarks about possible mega-tsunami deposits that I brought up during the podcast. It is my impression after investing a fair amount of time researching this phenomenon that it warrants serious consideration, especially in light of what we have witnessed during the past decade, two tsunami induced mega-disasters in Japan and the Indian Ocean. Several comments were particularly dismissive, so I am setting down this small exposition, without malice, to demonstrate that the remarks made on The Joe Rogan Experience were preceded by a substantial amount of background research and thought. While the following remarks pertain to this one issue specifically, they are also relevant to the general attitude evinced in many of the other comments critical of something I said that are obviously being made by individuals whose preconceived opinions were incompatible with the information I presented and their objections were nothing more than a knee jerk emotional response rather than a reasoned critique with some actual thought behind it.





Chevron forms created on a stream sandbar by local spring floods in Georgia, USA. The significant point is that these forms were produced by flowing water, not wind. After the flood subsides and the sand deposits dry out they will become subject to wind erosion and modification until they are stabilized by vegetation.




Chevron forms found on the southern tip of Madagascar. Were these formations created by wind or water? If the chevrons are formed of fine-grained wind transported sediment why is the line of demarcation at the distal end so distinct? What kind of aeolian process would produce features of this form and magnitude? The light colored deposits near the upper end of the chevrons are sand. This sand is undoubtedly being modified by wind, but this does not mean that the whole complex of lancet-like forms composing the chevrons were originally created by wind.

For scale...







The Burckle Crater impact is speculated to be Noah's flood...
---



Small scale parabolic dune forms and hummocky topography produced by local flooding in Peachtree Creek, GA are clearly visible in this photograph. The open end of the parabola seen in the top center points in the up-current direction which was from right to left. Again, these sedimentary forms are initially produced by flowing water and later modified by wind.



Large scale parabolic dune forms on the Rolling Palouse landscape of SE Washington State. Note the large parabolic shaped dune in the foreground. It opens upcurrent, flow was from right to left (north to south). Compare the general morphology of this landscape with the water shaped forms in the previous photograph. This landscape is the product of wind AND water. A study of mega-scale paleohydrology reveals the scale-invariant, or self-similar nature of fluvial forms across a wide variety of spatial scales and signifies its value as a means of comparison and recognition of mega features whose origins it is not possible to witness directly.









Summary:

-comet impact on North American icecap, images above (cooling was the existing paradigm prior to this)
-massive, cataclysmic flooding (see Washington state photo above)
-sea levels rise, massive amount of water vapor injected into the atmophere leading to a greenhouse effect/ rapid warming

Multiple impacts of varying scale have occurred leading to cyclical change....

Randall does a better job of describing this (in great, well referenced length) than I am above in this overview. His site and vids are definitely worth looking into.

LINK


This post was edited on 4/22/17 at 10:41 pm
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35437 posts
Posted on 4/22/17 at 10:15 pm to
They say that a major meteorite has hit the earth about 3-4 times...

With the power of 100 Nukes.

And it cleansed the world. And we started anew each time.

No worries.
Posted by ThinePreparedAni
In a sea of cognitive dissonance
Member since Mar 2013
11089 posts
Posted on 4/22/17 at 10:18 pm to
Multiple / different impacts...















---





LINK

quote:



Clay tablet holds clue to asteroid mystery
By Nic Fleming, Science Correspondent
12:01AM BST 31 Mar 2008

British scientists have deciphered a mysterious ancient clay tablet and believe they have solved a riddle over a giant asteroid impact more than 5,000 years ago.

Geologists have long puzzled over the shape of the land close to the town of Köfels in the Austrian Alps, but were unable to prove it had been caused by an asteroid.

Now researchers say their translation of symbols on a star map from an ancient civilisation includes notes on a mile-wide asteroid that later hit Earth - which could have caused tens of thousands of deaths. The circular clay tablet was discovered 150 years ago by Sir Austen Henry Layard, a leading Victorian archaeologist, in the remains of the royal palace at Nineveh, capital of ancient Assyria, in what is now Iraq.





This post was edited on 4/22/17 at 10:28 pm
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58035 posts
Posted on 4/22/17 at 10:19 pm to
Posted by Boudin
Lafayette
Member since Oct 2006
10133 posts
Posted on 4/22/17 at 10:24 pm to
quote:

Interesting how the Common Era just so happens to start when Jesus was born.

Exactly... Age of Pisces = 2 fish


Posted by Boudin
Lafayette
Member since Oct 2006
10133 posts
Posted on 4/22/17 at 10:28 pm to
quote:

Yeah...I don't understand why they do this BCE and CE bullshite. We all know what it means.

BCE/CE > BC/AD
Posted by Boudin
Lafayette
Member since Oct 2006
10133 posts
Posted on 4/22/17 at 10:30 pm to
quote:

ThinePreparedAni

Guessing you saw my post?

It did deserve its own thread
This post was edited on 4/22/17 at 11:23 pm
Posted by ThinePreparedAni
In a sea of cognitive dissonance
Member since Mar 2013
11089 posts
Posted on 4/22/17 at 10:36 pm to
quote:

Guessing you saw my post?


Yes. Timely update

It did deserve it's own thread...
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37574 posts
Posted on 4/22/17 at 10:40 pm to
When I was at Fish Camp back in March a bunch of us had a big discussion about this one night around the campfire.

Pretty sure it was Graham whatshisname who started all of this some years ago.

It always made sense to me because human civilization was way behind in North America compared to other continents. I always figured it had to be because of a comet impact or the Yellowstone caldera.
Posted by Gusoline
Jacksonville, NC
Member since Dec 2013
7618 posts
Posted on 4/22/17 at 10:40 pm to
so, liberals twist and scew and only use science to prove their arguments, while denying it when it goes against them? Color me shocked.
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48268 posts
Posted on 4/22/17 at 10:51 pm to
quote:

so, liberals twist and scew and only use science to prove their arguments, while denying it when it goes against them? Color me shocked.


They are sick little Totalitarians, aren't they?

Posted by Boudin
Lafayette
Member since Oct 2006
10133 posts
Posted on 4/22/17 at 11:36 pm to
Check my latest and let me know
Posted by John McClane
Member since Apr 2010
36666 posts
Posted on 4/23/17 at 12:10 am to
I have to admit this is fascinating.

Do the chevrons on all 3 continents (Africa, Asia, and Australia) match the angle from the epicenter? Looks like they would
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 15
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 15Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram