After This Week, Anybody Still Think Chris Wallace Is a Reputable Hard-News Journalist?

For purposes of full disclosure, I stopped watching Chris Wallace in the Spring of 2015. Rand Paul had officially announced his campaign for the Presidency, and I wanted to see how Wallace & others would cover the announcement that particular Sunday. Predictably, Wallace and the neocon goons on his panel (some combination of George Will, Karl Rove, Lynn Cheney, Britt Hume, etc.) were totally dismissive of Paul (They hate Trump the most, but any "outsider" like Paul will always be rejected by the Establishment).

But anyway, did anybody finally "see the light" regarding Wallace after the disgusting way he's handled himself this week? His debate performance (I thought he placed 2nd) was bad enough, but Wallace has been one of the few journalists who has refused to at least temporarily "back off" following the President's diagnosis of testing positive for the China Virus. Hell, even Rachel Maddow said this was a time for prayers for the President and First Lady.

But, Wallace? He jumped in immediately and claimed that Trump's diagnosis was a win for Joe Biden and "wearing a damn mask."

Anybody else thoroughly disgusted with Wallace's deplorable antics this week? Remember, Wallace isn't a pundit like Tucker Carlson or Laura Ingraham. He the face of Fox's hard-news division. Dude's supposed to be objective and unbiased.