Abortion ghouls and lovers- The SCOTUS IS NOT OVERTURNING ROE

Typical. Spread fear to garner votes.

quote:

---

No court, no matter the makeup, is overturning 40+ year of precedent.

---

Lie

As if its the first time either

quote:

---

Covingtontiger77

---

You may want to look at what ROE overturned.

quote:

---

The SCOTUS IS NOT OVERTURNING ROE

---

Why not? It should be overturned.

I remember reading a while back that overturning Roe would actually be a positive outcome for the pro-choice movement.

Contrary to what many think, overturning Roe doesn't outlaw abortion, it simply allows states to decide the matter. And most states would keep the status quo. The few that would outlaw it (like Utah and Mississippi) already have few and abysmal options. Banning Roe would result in a huge outpouring of support and money that would result in a shiny new abortion clinics built on the state line with transportation services, etc.

quote:

---

Such a false flag. No court, no matter the makeup, is overturning 40+ year of precedent.


So quit whining.

---

Given the complete f*cking absurdity of the "logic" of Roe, there is a possibility that it could be overturned. It would probably take a court comprised of 8 extremely conservative justices to get 5 to overturn it, but it could happen.

quote:

---

Now, it is possible that some state law restrictions on abortion legislation may be upheld by the SCOTUS- possibly.

---

Rather than trimester, I think a law prohibiting abortions past the potential viability of a fetus could be upheld. As of now, the earliest born baby to survive was at 21 weeks. That's about 5 months. With medical advancements in the future, it's conceivable that fetuses can be viable at 16-20 weeks. That would put any prohibition based on viability about half way through the second trimester.

Another possibility is that states implement prohibitions based upon when the fetus can noticeably feel pain. Again, given the medical advancements in the future, that may prohibit abortions into the first trimester.

In any event, it is "probably likely" that regulations regarding such things as admitting privileges will be upheld in the future if the Republicans can get this nominee through to the Supreme Court.

quote:

---

Such a false flag. No court, no matter the makeup, is overturning 40+ year of precedent.

---

I tend to disagree. We now have so much more scientific data on fetal development than we did 40 years ago. Roe is a complete violation of equal protection amongst other well historied constitutional precedents.

Not saying they will come out and straight up vacate it (or whatever the legal term is) but they will erode it significantly because it should be.

Would be a major betrayal to not go after Roe when the Supreme Court is conservative for the first time in generations

quote:

---

Abortion ghouls and lovers-

---

Quite the phonies...they claim, generally, that their quest is for bodily rights for themselves and others...My body, my choice right? However I have never heard them get riled up for something THAT IS ACTUALLY ILLEGAL such as selling a kidney for example. I mean seriously, think of all the lives that would be saved by allowing this plus all the poor people their ilk tries to claim to be for...some of these poor people could make mint by selling a kidney. Might actually improve their quality of life in the big picture, even though they might be down a kidney...the monies they make might overcompensate for this to their good health.

I am not trying to be ghoulish...but let's be real, the "Pro-choice" crew are full of shite with their argument and totally disingenuous with this whole "My body, my choice" tripe. Their beef is strictly focused on having abortion legal for a defacto form of birth control. Again, this is evidenced by their silence on the plight of those who want to use their body to improve their lot in life. I really don't see these pro-choice folks holding many demonstrations or being very vocal on the whole prostitution thing either. Again, something illegal, unlike abortion, but it directly pertains to someone having the right to do as they wish with their body. I am not advocating organ sales nor prostitution myself but clearly the "pro-choice" folks are not being honest with the real reason they are so narrowly focused on abortion specifically.

Finally, let's look at yet another litmus test of many on the left who claim our bodies should be our choice...how about hydroxychloroquine? I hear many liberals doing what they can to make sure those who would wish to be prescribed this medication not be able to receive it. Again, this happens to be something liberals oppose since Trump advocates this medicine so therefore their whole willingness for body and choice doesn't quite seem to jive with how they actually come down on this subject. I understand the libs don't expect to be called out on their phony ways by any entity of count but they are not as smart as they think they are because it doesn't take much to spot their duplicity with their precious abortion worship.

quote:

---

Such a false flag. No court, no matter the makeup, is overturning 40+ year of precedent.


So quit whining.

---

woman should have the right to kill their young - Covingtontiger77