- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
A way to fix our birth rate/demo issues? Hungary waives income taxes on women with 4+ kids
Posted on 2/14/19 at 12:37 am
Posted on 2/14/19 at 12:37 am
LINK
I would play around with the numbers, something like waiving income taxes below ~$100k for married couples (i.e. men and women) with 2+ kids. Brokedicks popping out kids already pay little to nothing in income taxes. This would be a great way to encourage middle and upper class couples to have children, while still taxing the "wealthy". I'd even support a bit higher tax rates above, say, $250k, to help "pay" for it. Remove the incentives for both husband and wife after divorce.
quote:
Measures announced included waivers on personal income tax for women raising at least four children for the rest of their lives and subsidies for large families to buy larger cars. The 'action plan' also extended a loan program to help families with at least two children to buy homes. Every woman under 40 will also be eligible for a preferential loan when she first gets married.
I would play around with the numbers, something like waiving income taxes below ~$100k for married couples (i.e. men and women) with 2+ kids. Brokedicks popping out kids already pay little to nothing in income taxes. This would be a great way to encourage middle and upper class couples to have children, while still taxing the "wealthy". I'd even support a bit higher tax rates above, say, $250k, to help "pay" for it. Remove the incentives for both husband and wife after divorce.
This post was edited on 2/14/19 at 12:38 am
9
Posted on 2/14/19 at 12:40 am to THRILLHO
Too many people as it is. I'm fully on team world depopulation. Get the world's population under 3 billion. 90% of the worlds ills disappear.
That's why I'm for zero or near zero immigration, ending foreign food and medicine aid, all that. Cold hearted pragmatist.
That's why I'm for zero or near zero immigration, ending foreign food and medicine aid, all that. Cold hearted pragmatist.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 12:41 am to THRILLHO
I support pro-natal policies, but the revenue loss from these breaks should be accompanied by a 2x reduction in non-discretionary spending, which means it will never happen.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 12:43 am to Rough1
quote:
Too many people as it is.
quote:
ending foreign food and medicine aid
I really don't think that the US cutting off all foreign aid would make a dent in the world's population.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 12:44 am to HempHead
quote:
I support pro-natal policies, but the revenue loss from these breaks should be accompanied by a 2x reduction in non-discretionary spending, which means it will never happen.
We could just enact this policy and print the difference!
Posted on 2/14/19 at 12:46 am to THRILLHO
quote:
We could just enact this policy and print the difference!
I guess we are going to do it anyway; might as well incentivize the productive class to actually have children above the replacement rate.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 12:47 am to THRILLHO
quote:
I really don't think that the US cutting off all foreign aid would make a dent in the world's population.
It would be difficult to quantify. In heavy drought years would have a greater effect than in other times.
Without GMO's the world could only support 3-4 billion people. I feel that is the natural balance our planet is designed for.
The Georgia guidestones call for around a world population of 800 million. I think that is a bit low, and we could eventually live as gods at close to 3 billion
This post was edited on 2/14/19 at 12:49 am
Posted on 2/14/19 at 12:48 am to Rough1
quote:
Too many people as it is. I'm fully on team world depopulation. Get the world's population under 3 billion. 90% of the worlds ills disappear.
Do you do history? Do you know how many wars, plagues, etc. occurred when there was less than 3 billion or less than 1 billion people on the planet?
It has nothing to do with how many people are on the planet, but what is in the hearts of the men on the planet.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 12:50 am to THRILLHO
It's a genius move. Based Hungary knows what's going on
I love that country
I love that country
Posted on 2/14/19 at 12:52 am to djmicrobe
quote:
Do you do history? Do you know how many wars, plagues, etc. occurred when there was less than 3 billion or less than 1 billion people on the planet?
It has nothing to do with how many people are on the planet, but what is in the hearts of the men on the planet.
I certainly do, and i fully appreciate your argument. Just saying in what we've learned as a species, if say in the next 150 years or so, we can get the world's population to around 3 billion, the vast majority of the world's problems would disappear.
Now maybe I am being too optimistic, and the number really is just under a billion. Call me a human optimist i guess
Posted on 2/14/19 at 1:17 am to THRILLHO
Why get married at all and just stay on welfare?
Posted on 2/14/19 at 1:20 am to THRILLHO
I like the Eastern Europeans and all, partying in Bratislava is fun as frick, but if your government’s pyramid scheme is so great that having 4 kids suddenly being free is cost effective... then you need to stop handing out so much welfare.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 5:43 am to THRILLHO
Basic income for life for sterilization is the path of least resistance. If its a woman’s right to choose, choose sterilization over murder, as early as 16 without parental authorization needed.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 5:45 am to THRILLHO
quote:
Hungary
1 of only 2 countries I'd visit outside the US; Italy is the other.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 6:58 am to Wtodd
quote:
1 of only 2 countries I'd visit outside the US; Italy is the other.
Phillipines. Get you a LBFM. They ruv you rong time.
Thank me later.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 7:27 am to Rough1
quote:
Just saying in what we've learned as a species,
I ain't no species. Imma man!
Species? Whatever. So, science man...
quote:
if say in the next 150 years or so, we can get the world's population to around 3 billion, the vast majority of the world's problems would disappear.
8 pages
Posted on 2/14/19 at 7:29 am to Rough1
quote:
if say in the next 150 years or so, we can get the world's population to around 3 billion, the vast majority of the world's problems would disappear.
The population growth will be slowing soon but we are in no way coming close to a resource depletion problem.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 7:35 am to THRILLHO
I take it you kids are really worried about a shortage of WASPS in America. That’s rich.
This post was edited on 2/14/19 at 7:37 am
Posted on 2/14/19 at 8:42 am to VOR
quote:
I take it you kids are really worried about a shortage of WASPS in America. That’s rich.
The worry is low IQ, social parasite breeding at Idiocracy levels, while high IQ, GDP and productivity contributor breeding is below replacement.
Who will the leftist twats like you tax in this scenario to fund your Marxist utopias?
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News