Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Lreynolds

Posted on 11/12/12 at 10:28 pm
Posted by jimjackandjose
Member since Jun 2011
6757 posts
Posted on 11/12/12 at 10:28 pm
Just wanted to say i agree with you completely and glad you a re standing up for the rules on lasportman thread about wax area
Posted by Slickback
Deer Stand
Member since Mar 2008
28156 posts
Posted on 11/12/12 at 10:31 pm to
link? to wtf you're talking about?
Posted by OldHickory
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2012
10826 posts
Posted on 11/12/12 at 10:35 pm to
Olsen Johnson is right!
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
72247 posts
Posted on 11/12/12 at 10:36 pm to
Posted by Lreynolds
Member since Mar 2012
286 posts
Posted on 11/12/12 at 11:42 pm to
Thanks, I appreciate that.
Posted by GREENHEAD22
Member since Nov 2009
20882 posts
Posted on 11/12/12 at 11:47 pm to
I am about to hit the hay but please check back here tomorrow or the next day. I have some questions for you in regards to the farm bill and future conservation and duck numbers.
Posted by Lreynolds
Member since Mar 2012
286 posts
Posted on 11/13/12 at 12:01 am to
I'm headed to bed myself.

I'll be flying aerial surveys for the rest of the week and won't be on the net much. Feel free to e-mail at: Lreynolds@wlf.la.gov

I saw a question on another thread about pintail numbers, which were down this year while most other species were up.

The major reason was loss of 35% of ponds at lower latitudes. Pintails, more than any other species, will over-fly the prairies in drier years and use breeding habitats further north which are not surveyed as well. In the pintail harvest strategy, the model has a bias-correction factor to account for the lower-than-actual estimates in years when they settle at higher latitudes.

Another reason was poor winter habitat conditions last year in the Central and Mississippi Flyways due to extreme drought. Again, compared to mallards, pintail populations seem to be effected more by winter habitat conditions such that in dry years when larger portions of the population are forced into more saline habitats in the 2 middle flyways, it has a negative population effect. Combined, these factors certainly influenced this spring's pintail breeding estimate.
Posted by MrCoachKlein
Member since Sep 2010
10310 posts
Posted on 11/13/12 at 12:10 am to
Post more often,
This post was edited on 11/13/12 at 12:11 am
Posted by Capt ST
High Plains
Member since Aug 2011
13676 posts
Posted on 11/13/12 at 8:48 am to
We're seeing a lot more pintail this year. I think it's largely a function of the habitat or lack there of in nearby areas.
Posted by jimjackandjose
Member since Jun 2011
6757 posts
Posted on 11/13/12 at 9:01 am to
Very much appreciate you posting on the site. I think you will find a better discussion with more respectable hunters on this site than on Lasportsman.

I pray those people never find the TDOB.
Posted by Motorboat
At the camp
Member since Oct 2007
24203 posts
Posted on 11/13/12 at 9:04 am to
quote:

I pray those people never find the TDOB


Somebody has to do some work over there

It really is sad how dumb some of the posters there are.
Posted by Capt ST
High Plains
Member since Aug 2011
13676 posts
Posted on 11/13/12 at 9:15 am to
I saw that thread yesterday about the Wax. No use arguing with idiots.
Posted by bossflossjr
The Great State of Louisiana
Member since Sep 2005
12284 posts
Posted on 11/13/12 at 9:36 am to
quote:

Lreynolds


You are one of my more favored posters. Thank you for what you do.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram