re: Woman kidnapped while jogging in Memphis UPDATE:body found

I'd want that video obviously. But I think he had help. I'd want it if I was going to use my car and do a swoop and swipe.

So the the working scenario is that he sees her jogging. Drives past her. Waits and then gets out and grabs her. Pribably punches her to stop her cold. Does he throw her on the passenger side or in the back seat?. If the backseat, he has to have help. You need someone to keep her somewhat incapacitated. If the passenger side, I can see the lone actor scenario. But it's extremely risky even with a gun.

I would put pressure on the brother, he's involved. This is not this guy's first murder .

Everything I read leads fo him not telling them (it was reported he refused to cooperate)

They knew his route and found her along it it the simplest answer imo but not confirmed to my knowledge

quote:

---

It’s her…ugh.

---

Damn, that sucks. I knew this most likely wouldn't have a happy ending, especially with the supporting evidence of the perp cleaning his vehicle and shite. But still, the confirmation of it sucks. Random acts of violence are scary shite. I hope this piece of shite gets the death penalty, and swiftly.

quote:

---

All new death penalty cases should be mandated to be carried out 365 days from sentencing.

---

Too many cases have been tossed out years later because evidence not available originally came out later on apppeal but would not have been out there in 365 days.

For example -

LINK

KIRK'S STORY
HOME WATCH ABOUT THE FILM KIRK'S STORY
KIRK'S STORY
In 1985, Kirk Noble Bloodsworth was sentenced to die in a Maryland penitentiary for the brutal rape and murder of 9 year old Dawn Hamilton. A crime he did not commit. This dark journey began almost 9 months earlier on July 25th, 1984 when two young boys, who were fishing in a small pond behind the apartment complex where Dawn lived, witnessed her walk off into the woods with a man they described as skinny, 6 foot-five, with a bushy mustache and blonde hair. They were the last people to see her alive.

Hours later, Dawn’s body was found lying facedown in the woods by a Baltimore Police Detective. At the time of the murder Kirk did not live in the area, was neither 6 foot five, nor was he blonde with a bushy mustache. He was a 6 foot, brawny redhead with mutton-chop sideburns who had worn glasses since age five.

He had witnesses who could place him at home at the time of the murder, and there was no physical evidence that linked Kirk to the crime scene. Despite all of this, Kirk was ultimately convicted by his slim resemblance to a composite drawing based on the eyewitness testimony of the two young boys, and the eyewitness identification of 3 others, one of which identified Kirk after seeing him on the news. Arrested within 3 weeks of the murder Kirk maintained his innocence from day one assuming somehow, some way, the police would realize they had the wrong man and the nightmare would end.

Sadly it did not. In March of 1985, Kirk Bloodsworth entered the dark recesses of the Maryland State Penitentiary, alone, and branded a monster, as he began his 9-year battle to prove his innocence from the confines of a 6×9 cell.

Through truly jaw-dropping twists and turns, chronicled in this film, Kirk finally won his freedom in 1993. Thanks to what was then a new technology called “genetic fingerprinting,” Kirk Bloodsworth became the first death row inmate exonerated by DNA.

Since his exoneration in 1993, Kirk has found his voice, making it his life’s mission to foster change in the criminal justice system, especially regarding issues surrounding wrongful convictions and the death penalty. He has become a vocal opponent of the death penalty, speaking publicly to small groups and large audiences, lobbying politicians, and working with other activists to rehabilitate the penal system. The pinnacle of this work to date came in 2004 when President George W. Bush signed into law the Kirk Noble Bloodsworth Post Conviction DNA Testing Program which provides block grants to States to pay for inmate post-conviction DNA testing.

Today, Kirk continues his fight across the country, including in his home state of Maryland, where, in 2013, he played an integral part in efforts to successfully repeal the death penalty.

In the face of the growing number of executions — and exonerations — in the United States, Kirk’s story is more important to tell than ever, as it uniquely captures a perfect storm of injustice, illustrating exactly how this can happen to anyone. His story reveals some of the most devastating flaws in our criminal justice system and sheds light on the moral ramifications of state imposed death penalties; proving that it is indeed possible to convict, and execute, innocent people.

© 2022 BLOODSWORTH - AN INNOCENT MAN Contact Us Embed and Share Powered by Assemble


ASSEMBLE

Is there a stream?

Did I just heart this guy spent 20 years in prison for kidnapping an assistant district attorney

He was in prison for a while but that definitely could be a possibility. Get his DNA evidence and cross reference it with other unsolved cases.

What really bothers me on this stuff is the effort that it takes. I don't like washing my car. Sure as hell don't like mowing the yard. I do them out of because I have to not be ause I choose to. The effort it takes to plan, abduct, rape, murder and then dispose of evidence is just a lot and warrants the death penalty. Open and shut case of a vile animal.

Yeah it doesn't make sense these days with the accuracy of DNA samples, video cameras, car tags, gps tracking on phones and watches, etc.

20 years ago you could make a case that maybe an eye witness didn't see the person very well or some other BS. The amt of corroborating evidence these days it should be tremendously easier to build a death penalty case and swiftly execute the animal.

Nope what is meant is that in the presence of DIRECT evidence in the form of video and CIRCUMSTANTIAL evidence in the form of DNA match, these heinous criminals should be fast-tracked to the electric chair. Direct evidence historically has been limited to eyewitness testimony and/or confession. And before you begin to rant on about muh circumstantial evidence, remember both types of evidence hold equal weight in court.