- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Two oil tankers in the Gulf of Oman attacked
Posted on 6/13/19 at 9:27 am to LNCHBOX
Posted on 6/13/19 at 9:27 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
I mean, yea. But if we went to that level, I'd say there would be more reasons than just this one incident, wouldn't you?
Well, we're talking about some poster's response to this incident specifically. Keep up, bruh
Posted on 6/13/19 at 9:27 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
I find it more fascinating that you're fascinated by people having different opinions
That's fascinating.
quote:
Better question, re conservatives allowed to think Hiroshima and Nagasaki were ok? Or does that fascinate you too?
Everyone is allowed to think anything and yes that fascinates me.
It's a great debate to have. Great debates are fascinating. Somewhere along the line in this country, people became incapable of having debates about things.
But I shouldn't have brought it into this thread. Let's talk about the right way to fix Iran issue.
Power vacuums and nuclear war aren't it.
ETA:
And I never said the word "innocents". You're combining my posts with someone else's.
This post was edited on 6/13/19 at 9:29 am
Posted on 6/13/19 at 9:28 am to upgrayedd
quote:
Well, we're talking about some poster's response to this incident specifically. Keep up, bruh
My question still stands, but I guess I'd deflect too since we both know it;s way more complicated than that.
Posted on 6/13/19 at 9:28 am to TheCaterpillar
quote:
For the pro-lifers in here, what about the babies, both born and unborn that would be killed by civilian bombing? How do you justify that?
What are your opinions of strategic bombing? Napalming Tokyo? Razing Dresden, Hamburg, Yokohama, etc to the ground? Nuking Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
Posted on 6/13/19 at 9:29 am to Tigeralum2008
quote:
How innocent were the sailors aboard those ships?
How innocent are those civilians in Iran that installed/support/allow/tolerate the actions of their governement?
So you're saying that they deserve to be nuked because they're powerless against a top 15 military power and brutal regime yet chose not to revolt? Odd.
This post was edited on 6/13/19 at 9:30 am
Posted on 6/13/19 at 9:29 am to upgrayedd
quote:
So you're saying that they deserve to be nuked because they're powerless against a top 15 military power yet chose not to revolt? Odd.
Where did he say deserved?
Posted on 6/13/19 at 9:30 am to GeorgeTheGreek
partially, LNCHBOX is here to argue now though so it's officially fricked
Posted on 6/13/19 at 9:30 am to TheCaterpillar
quote:
And I never said the word "innocents".
Weak.
Posted on 6/13/19 at 9:30 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
My question still stands, but I guess I'd deflect too since we both know it;s way more complicated than that.
Always hilarious when you move the goalposts then claim victory. It's like clockwork. fricking clown shoes, man.
Posted on 6/13/19 at 9:31 am to Ed Osteen
quote:
partially, LNCHBOX is here to argue now though so it's officially fricked
Typical OT. Someone says something dumb to derail the thread. Many comment besides me, and I';m the one ruining it.
Posted on 6/13/19 at 9:31 am to Ed Osteen
quote:
partially, LNCHBOX is here to argue now though so it's officially fricked
Yep. Dude is a douche nozzle.
Posted on 6/13/19 at 9:31 am to Ed Osteen
quote:
The House voted Tuesday to grant new legal powers to a key committee investigating the Trump administration, handing Democrats another tool in their battle to bore deeper into Robert Mueller's report on Russia's election meddling and potential obstruction by President Trump.
quote:
A U.S. defense official told CBS News senior national security correspondent David Martin it was "highly likely Iran caused these attacks" on Thursday.
Posted on 6/13/19 at 9:31 am to upgrayedd
quote:
Always hilarious when you move the goalposts then claim victory. It's like clockwork. fricking clown shoes, man.
I didn't move shite. That was not the discussion in this thread.
Posted on 6/13/19 at 9:33 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Where did he say deserved?
When he said they're part of the regime because they didn't revolt. Keep up, junior
Posted on 6/13/19 at 9:33 am to upgrayedd
quote:
When he said they're part of the regime because they didn't revolt. Keep up, junior
Your condescension is hilarious.
Posted on 6/13/19 at 9:33 am to kengel2
quote:mission statement of US Navy The mission of the Navy is to maintain, train and equip combat-ready Naval forces capable of winning wars, deterring aggression and maintaining freedom of the seas.
Are the Marshal Islands and Panama going to respond?
Why do we have to jump in first?
Posted on 6/13/19 at 9:33 am to Tigeralum2008
quote:
How innocent were the sailors aboard those ships? How innocent are those civilians in Iran that installed/support/allow/tolerate the actions of their governement?
None of us are innocent because of Original Sin.
Posted on 6/13/19 at 9:34 am to LNCHBOX
He admitted the comment wasn't needed and was out of place.
quote:
I didn't move shite. That was not the discussion in this thread.
Posted on 6/13/19 at 9:34 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
I didn't move shite. That was not the discussion in this thread.
Classic LNCHBOX
Posted on 6/13/19 at 9:34 am to TigerFanInSouthland
quote:
What are your opinions of strategic bombing? Napalming Tokyo? Razing Dresden, Hamburg, Yokohama, etc to the ground? Nuking Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
They're different depending on each.
War time is different, especially when the opponent has themselves attacked civilian population centers like Germany had.
I would not have nuked Hiroshima and Nagasaki the way we did, in hindsight. Hindsight is bullshite in things like this though, I get that. At the time, I probably would've made the same call.
Popular
Back to top



1





