- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 3/14/23 at 3:32 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
I’m glad the Biden administration is focusing on the important things while our country is on the verge of a circa 1929 level banking collapse.
Not only will you not be able to afford these monstrosities, that don’t clean. They will be built in China or Mexico, not even helping US manufacturing.
Posted on 3/14/23 at 4:37 am to Byrdybyrd05
Any appliance with a lower global warming potential is complete shite.
Posted on 3/14/23 at 4:40 am to Joshjrn
quote:
The staggeringly overwhelming majority of water used is by industry and agriculture.
Yeah like those damn liberals and their almonds.
Posted on 3/14/23 at 4:41 am to Byrdybyrd05
These politicians and bureaucrats are the dumbest MFers on Earth.
Only 13% of all water consumption in the North America is for domestic use. The remainder is industry and agriculture. Slightly lower but on par with South America (19%) and Europe (15%). Africa and all of Asia are under 9% domestic with more than 80% being used by agriculture.
Only 17% of residential water consumption in the US is for laundry.
Only 13% of all water consumption in the North America is for domestic use. The remainder is industry and agriculture. Slightly lower but on par with South America (19%) and Europe (15%). Africa and all of Asia are under 9% domestic with more than 80% being used by agriculture.
Only 17% of residential water consumption in the US is for laundry.
This post was edited on 3/14/23 at 5:00 am
Posted on 3/14/23 at 4:42 am to AUstar
quote:
The amount of water on earth hasn't changed in billions of years. The problem is transportation and getting it to drought prone areas. Are you under the impression that when you run the water in your sink that it "vanishes" once it goes down the drain?
Shhh, these morons think it floats out to space or planet earth must have its own drain plug letting water out.
This post was edited on 3/14/23 at 4:43 am
Posted on 3/14/23 at 5:50 am to Byrdybyrd05
Didn’t this already happen years ago? Washing machines don’t fill all the way up with water anymore.
Posted on 3/14/23 at 6:03 am to PrimeTime Money
quote:
Didn’t this already happen years ago? Washing machines don’t fill all the way up with water anymore.
Guess they plan to make them worse.
This post was edited on 3/14/23 at 6:06 am
Posted on 3/14/23 at 6:18 am to Byrdybyrd05
Every member of the Biden admin is some type of freak/tranny/degenerate.
But those types of people don't care if they stink or have nasty clothes.
People like the energy secretary probably already have to wear depends.
But those types of people don't care if they stink or have nasty clothes.
People like the energy secretary probably already have to wear depends.
Posted on 3/14/23 at 7:33 am to SelaTiger
quote:
We are using way too much water, this is a good thing. I’d like for water to still be abundant when my grandkids are growing up.
I agree. It always worries me when people drink water because we can never get that water back
Y’all should be drinking cokes
Posted on 3/14/23 at 7:43 am to Byrdybyrd05
Make them a region/areas requirement
Sure, Arizona or southern Cali. But not in south Louisiana where we have ample water.
I prefer my clothes to be clean. I already had the 2+ hr run time on my “energy saver” dishwasher
My household would cease to function after a week of the washer taking 2-3hrs for a clean cycle…….
Sure, Arizona or southern Cali. But not in south Louisiana where we have ample water.
I prefer my clothes to be clean. I already had the 2+ hr run time on my “energy saver” dishwasher
My household would cease to function after a week of the washer taking 2-3hrs for a clean cycle…….
Posted on 3/14/23 at 7:46 am to tigeraddict
making appliances more “energy friendly” has also led to them being more disposable. is it really better for the “environment” long term replacing washers, dryers, fridges, and dishwashers constantly like we do now?
Posted on 3/14/23 at 7:49 am to Byrdybyrd05
frick all that
Posted on 3/14/23 at 8:16 am to Byrdybyrd05
Don't think it matters what we do. The developing nation of China will offset it in a week. Only a world wide pandemic shut down would make a difference. Oh wait....they did that.
Posted on 3/14/23 at 8:24 am to nugget
quote:
You’ve gotta be at least slightly embarrassed by this, right?
These are the same people that want your small kids dancing provocatively for them while promoting the nonsense that men can have periods and get pregnant. You think you can embarrass people like this?
Posted on 3/14/23 at 8:26 am to Byrdybyrd05
yea well Fukdem! Come and take my washer! 
Posted on 3/14/23 at 8:39 am to Byrdybyrd05
Vote for democrats, get democrat things.
Posted on 3/14/23 at 8:40 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
This is a problem in a limited number of places. If you’re living somewhere that it is, you can get the shitty appliances.
+1 This stupid "one size fits all" thinking has to go. But the Feds think the entire country is the same. And that people are too stupid to make a choice (OK, many are, but let that be their problem).
I'm good with the Feds setting standards for how this information is presented, so that the customer can make an informed choice. But that should include how clean it gets the clothes, how long the wash cycle is, etc.
Posted on 3/14/23 at 8:43 am to Byrdybyrd05
This is what ruined washing machines to begin with.
Posted on 3/14/23 at 8:47 am to sostan
quote:
These politicians and bureaucrats are the dumbest MFers on Earth.
Only 13% of all water consumption in the North America is for domestic use. The remainder is industry and agriculture. ...
Only 17% of residential water consumption in the US is for laundry.
So they want our washers to become more expensive, less reliable (as others have said - more going to the landfill, more pollution created from making the replacement in China with a coal powered plant), but knocking another few % off the water usage of a product that's responsible for about 2% of our water usage?
30% less water use would mean ~ 0.6% overall, once every washer is replaced. It would be less of course, for all the times people would run the machine twice to get the clothes clean, or run a smaller load. We need to run a small load on our new washer for sheets towels, the thing goes out of balance and tries like 4 times to rebalance by dumping the water and refilling. I bet that isn't included in their 'energy guide' procedure.
0.13 × 0.17 = 0.0221
This post was edited on 3/14/23 at 8:48 am
Page 4 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News