- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
T/F? No “Approved” Covid Treatments Is/Was Needed for Emergency Approval of Vaccines?
Posted on 6/11/21 at 10:14 am
Posted on 6/11/21 at 10:14 am
This was mentioned to me and I would like to know if it is true. In order for the powers that be to approve a vaccine for emergency use, there need to be no “approved” treatment options. True or False?
Posted on 6/11/21 at 10:16 am to STEVED00
FDA website says this
quote:
Under section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), when the Secretary of HHS declares that an emergency use authorization is appropriate, FDA may authorize unapproved medical products or unapproved uses of approved medical products to be used in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions caused by CBRN threat agents when certain criteria are met, including there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives. The HHS declaration to support such use must be based on one of four types of determinations of threats or potential threats by the Secretary of HHS, Homeland Security, or Defense.
Please note: a determination under section 319 of the Public Health Service Act that a public health emergency exists, such as the one issued on January 31, 2020, does not enable FDA to issue EUAs. On February 4, 2020, the HHS Secretary determined that there is a public health emergency that has a significant potential to affect national security or the health and security of United States citizens living abroad, and that involves the virus that causes COVID-19. Subsequent HHS declarations supporting use of EUAs and based on this determination are described in the blue boxes below.
Information on terminated and revoked EUAs can be found in archived information.
Posted on 6/11/21 at 10:17 am to STEVED00
False.
Treatment is very vague terminology.
Treatment is very vague terminology.
Posted on 6/11/21 at 10:17 am to STEVED00
They shite on Trump for suggesting HCQ cocktail. Turns out he was right on that as well. Big Pharma needed money though, and HCQ pills are dirt cheap.
Posted on 6/11/21 at 10:20 am to TaderSalad
quote:Not really
They shite on Trump for suggesting HCQ cocktail. Turns out he was right on that as well
Bring on the downvotes from hell, I dont give a shite. Im so tired of this HCQ shite
The media was corrupt and evil for touting it as bad, and saying everything they did with HCQ simply because Trump mentioned it. It was horseshite
However, the hospitals and systems Across America used the shite out of HCQ and AZM and it simply didnt really work. It was 100% worth the shot, and Trump said NOTHING wrong at all.
This post was edited on 6/11/21 at 10:21 am
Posted on 6/11/21 at 10:20 am to Displaced
From another post in the thread
Thoughts?
quote:
FDA may authorize unapproved medical products or unapproved uses of approved medical products to be used in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions caused by CBRN threat agents when certain criteria are met, including there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives.
Thoughts?
Posted on 6/11/21 at 10:25 am to lsupride87
quote:
However, the hospitals and systems Across America used the shite out of HCQ and AZM and it simply didnt really work. It was 100% worth the shot, and Trump said NOTHING wrong at all.
I'll need to find it but I saw something 2 days ago that said when using "weight adjusted" HCQ, studies saw a 200% decrease in deaths.
I assume that means they pumped obese people with 5x-10x the normal amount.
I can't find the exact link but this refers to it. Study not yet peer-reviewed...
quote:
“A new, not yet peer-reviewed study of HCQ released this month found it, taken with azithromycin, improved COVID-19 survival by nearly 200% in ventilated patients.”
This post was edited on 6/11/21 at 10:28 am
Posted on 6/11/21 at 10:26 am to bikerack
quote:No
I'll need to find it but I saw something 2 days ago that said when using "weight adjusted" HCQ, studies saw a 200% decrease in deaths
That was a non-controlled study of only 250 people, and they used it during mechanical ventilation.
Already a thread on that if you want to dive in
Posted on 6/11/21 at 10:30 am to lsupride87
Understood.
I just don't see how you can throw around phrases such as "it simply didn't work".
One of my best friends (obese) was in bad shape but luckily got HCQ and AZ early on. His doc said it was a miracle he didn't die based on what he was seeing with other patients.
Whatever...
I just don't see how you can throw around phrases such as "it simply didn't work".
One of my best friends (obese) was in bad shape but luckily got HCQ and AZ early on. His doc said it was a miracle he didn't die based on what he was seeing with other patients.
Whatever...
This post was edited on 6/11/21 at 10:36 am
Posted on 6/11/21 at 10:32 am to lsupride87
Thanks for the feedback. Just seems like there could be motivation to down play other treatment options in order not to derail the vaccine getting “emergency use” approval.
Posted on 6/11/21 at 10:32 am to bikerack
Wasn't the biggest issue with the HCQ results was it was found to be effective when used early in the COVID diagnosis; but once patients reached a certain point they didn't have enough time for the HCQ to aide them.
Then the natural argument will be, how do we know that those that recovered from the HCQ treatment would not have recovered naturally anyway since COVID affected everyone differently
Then the natural argument will be, how do we know that those that recovered from the HCQ treatment would not have recovered naturally anyway since COVID affected everyone differently
Posted on 6/11/21 at 10:33 am to lsupride87
quote:I could be wrong but wasn't he touting it as a preventative medication but this new study mentions its usefulness as a treatment?
and Trump said NOTHING wrong at all.
Posted on 6/11/21 at 10:34 am to STEVED00
quote:
Just seems like there could be motivation to down play other treatment options in order not to derail the vaccine getting “emergency use” approval.
Kind of like how certain people of influence will shite on and shutdown the J&J vaccine at the first sign of potential issues; yet remain silent when there are any issues/problems with the vaccine that they are directly tied to?
Posted on 6/11/21 at 10:35 am to bikerack
quote:
I just don't see how you can throw around phrases suck as "it simply didn't work".
It may work for certain people for a reason that hasn't been discovered yet, but over the large clinical trials they were not able to find a statistical difference between those treated wit hcq and other treatment options. You can get weird results with small sample sizes an non-randomized studies
Posted on 6/11/21 at 10:35 am to Weekend Warrior79
quote:
since COVID affected everyone differently
Like if you were elderly and/or had a couple co-morbidities it was very dangerous (percentage wise) but if you didn’t have the things mentioned above then it wasn’t that severe (percentage wise)?
Posted on 6/11/21 at 10:35 am to bikerack
quote:Because for the majority of people, even obese people, you could give them poptarts and sprite as the treatment and they will live. Thats why it was difficult to actually tell if anything was working. Covid is such an overall benign virus its tough to tell
One of my best friends (obese) was in bad shape but luckily got HCQ and AZ early on.
This post was edited on 6/11/21 at 10:36 am
Posted on 6/11/21 at 10:38 am to shel311
quote:He simply said they are seeing some good results and there is some promise when used early. And at the time, we did think that in the hospital. But after time we saw it wasnt really effective. No harm in his comments, and no harm in trying
I could be wrong but wasn't he touting it as a preventative medication but this new study mentions its usefulness as a treatment?
However, once Trump mentioned it at all the fricking media went on a war against HCQ
But yes, this study, which isnt really that great anyway, is about giving it to ventilated patients and not early on
This post was edited on 6/11/21 at 10:40 am
Posted on 6/11/21 at 10:43 am to lsupride87
quote:Right, while I certainly agree Trump was needlessly shite on a great deal of the time, I don't think the recent study is the big vindication that this board thinks it is. Like you said, it's a study on ventilated patients, and Trump's talking points on HCQ were more preventative so I fail to see the link there.
But yes, this study, which isnt really that great anyway, is about giving it to ventilated patients and not early on
Or basically, everyone on both sides overreacting unnecessarily.
This post was edited on 6/11/21 at 10:44 am
Posted on 6/11/21 at 10:43 am to lsupride87
Banning HCQ shouldve resulted in some form of punishments. At the time when we had so much uncertainty a doctor shouldve been allowed to prescribe it and people shouldve been allowed to get it. That was all political bs. SAD!
Posted on 6/11/21 at 10:49 am to lsupride87
quote:
lsupride87
Are there other treatments that are effective? It seemed like things were very quickly dismissed or downplayed that seemed promising and very low risk. Just seemed odd why. I know OMB but it seemed like more to it than that.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News