Started By
Message

re: State Police has released a video about the Kyren Lacy incident

Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:18 pm to
Posted by CreoleTigerEsq
Noneya
Member since Nov 2007
861 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

Why? Why did the truck have his brakes on? What caused the truck to put his god damn brakes on? Hmmmmmmmm, I wonder what that could have been.


The driver of the gold truck stated, himself, that he was only traveling at a rate of speed of 28 miles per hour. It's hilarious that there is, somehow, no evidence where he states that he felt any sense of danger from a vehicle that was almost a football field away from him when the accident happened.
Posted by demtigers73
Member since Aug 2014
5954 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:19 pm to
THE DRIVER OF THE GOLD TRUCK SAID, SHE CAUSED THE WRECK, sorry you don't understand that. He was there, you and I weren't!
Posted by CreoleTigerEsq
Noneya
Member since Nov 2007
861 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

prompting the truck IN ONCOMING TRAFFIC to brake.


This is precisely what the gold truck should have done. Now, answer these questions:

How does this absolve the driver of the vehicle behind the gold truck from maintaining a proper distance from him?

How does this absolve the driver of the vehicle behind the gold truck from veering into an opposing lane (oncoming traffic)?

How does this square with the lockbox evidence that shows her braking exactly 0.5 seconds before veering into the opposing lane (with oncoming traffic) in an effort to avoid rear ending the gold truck?
Posted by TigerGman
Center of the Universe
Member since Sep 2006
13394 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

The driver of the gold truck stated, himself, that he was only traveling at a rate of speed of 28 miles per hour. It's hilarious that there is, somehow, no evidence where he states that he felt any sense of danger from a vehicle that was almost a football field away from him when the accident happened.

Yeah, except the really hilarious part is you say nothing about how fast Lacy was going and the closure rate of both cars at less than a football filed in length.
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49047 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

THE DRIVER OF THE GOLD TRUCK SAID, SHE CAUSED THE WRECK, sorry you don't understand that. He was there, you and I weren't!


Since when do parties to an accident determine fault?



Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
88582 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

Since when do parties to an accident determine fault?


So many of these apologists have said how unreliable eyewitnesses are all throughout this thread, but this one is legit
Posted by tankyank13
NOLA
Member since Nov 2012
8176 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

THE DRIVER OF THE GOLD TRUCK SAID, SHE CAUSED THE WRECK


Everyone is entitled to their opinion. What does it have to do with the facts in this case?
Posted by CreoleTigerEsq
Noneya
Member since Nov 2007
861 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

...except the really hilarious part is you say nothing about how fast Lacy was going and the closure rate of both cars


... because this literally has nothing to do, at all, with who caused the accident to the person that died.

Had the driver of the vehicle behind the gold truck maintained a proper distance, she would have had enough time to brake (without having to veer into an opposing lane with oncoming traffic).

Had the driver of the vehicle behind the gold truck stayed in her lane and rear ended the vehicle in front of her, chances are that the person who died would have still been living, with his car in tact.

The gold truck, for some reason, chose not to veer into a lane of oncoming traffic, and was IN FRONT of the vehicle the caused the accident.
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49047 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

So many of these apologists have said how unreliable eyewitnesses are all throughout this thread,


You can scrap every witness statement given; the video evidence alone is more than enough for probable cause for a warrant.
Posted by TigerGman
Center of the Universe
Member since Sep 2006
13394 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

At 11:25 in this video the driver of the gold truck, states the lady in the car caused the wreck.

The Trooper also tells him what to write in his sworn statement.

Driver of the gold truck doesn't even mention Green Charger.


UGh WTF? Ever occur to you that video clip was carefully edited to stop a second before the OLD Man says he was about to Head On me!
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
58277 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

was almost a football field away from him when the accident happened.
almost a football field? 140-150' from wreck to where his car was at the instant of the wreck.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
88582 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

... because this literally has nothing to do, at all, with who caused the accident to the person that died.


Sure hope you aren't actually a lawyer. You absolutely can be found negligent for an accident that your reckless driving caused even if your vehicle isn't involved in the collision.
Posted by civiltiger07
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
15002 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

almost a football field? 140-150' from wreck to where his car was at the instant of the wreck.


A football field is 100yds. That would be 300ft.

And lacy was 92 yards from the accident when he got back in the proper lane of travel.

And 72 yards from the accident at the time of the collusion.
This post was edited on 10/7/25 at 1:37 pm
Posted by dnm3305
Member since Feb 2009
15836 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

THE DRIVER OF THE GOLD TRUCK SAID, SHE CAUSED THE WRECK, sorry you don't understand that. He was there, you and I weren't!


Yea, and 4 other statements, INCLUDING the 18 wheeler driver who had the best vantage point of all, stated the exact opposite.

If the gold truck would have felt no danger then he would have never put the brakes on.

But, in fact, despite him ONLY going 28mph, he still felt enough danger from the moron speeding towards him in a green charger to put his brakes on.

Sorry you can’t handle the truth. I’m sure you’d feel differently if Lacy’s recklessness would have killed your family.
Posted by civiltiger07
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
15002 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

Yea, and 4 other statements, INCLUDING the 18 wheeler driver who had the best vantage point of all, stated the exact opposite.


The 18-wheeler driver also said lacy drove between the two vehicles that collided before the collision.
Posted by The Third Leg
Idiot Out Wandering Around
Member since May 2014
11650 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

almost a football field? 140-150' from wreck to where his car was at the instant of the wreck.


Lawyer says data proves he was 72 yards away at the time of impact. Might want to grab your calculator.

He was nowhere close to them and the rate of speed was low, gold truck was going 28mph 2.9 seconds before the crash. Drivers lacy passed before getting back in her lane were under 40mph. The driver between lacy and the crash didn’t even come close to being involved in the crash, much less lacy. There was plenty of distance to safely stop without slamming on brakes, and that’s what happened.
Posted by tankyank13
NOLA
Member since Nov 2012
8176 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

because this literally has nothing to do, at all, with who caused the accident to the person that died.


You obviously have never done a root cause analysis
Posted by CreoleTigerEsq
Noneya
Member since Nov 2007
861 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

The 18-wheeler driver also said lacy drove between the two vehicles that collided before the collision.


This would make him an unreliable witness. He literally created facts that didn't exist.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
88582 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

The 18-wheeler driver also said lacy drove between the two vehicles that collided before the collision.


Dang, almost like putting much stock into what any of the drivers said is pretty useless, huh?
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49047 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

Lawyer says data proves he was 72 yards away at the time of impact. Might want to grab your calculator.


While you have that calculator out, you may want to figure out how long it takes to travel 72 yards at 80 m.p.h..

It's less than 2 seconds.
Jump to page
Page First 11 12 13 14 15 ... 27
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 13 of 27Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram