- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: State Police has released a video about the Kyren Lacy incident
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:11 pm to dnm3305
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:11 pm to dnm3305
quote:Wait
As she shouldn’t as she was merely reacting to what that a-hole Lacy caused.
So even though the white car driver broke the law and her breaking the law directly caused the death of someone else, she doesn’t have to accept any responsibility because Lacy made the truck brake?
Oh yeh, “those blacks” are the type that don’t accept responsibility huh?
This post was edited on 10/7/25 at 12:12 pm
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:11 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Well it seems like the white car driver doesn’t have to accept any responsibility according to the police
Criminally, no
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:13 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Oh yeh, “those blacks” are the type that don’t accept responsibility huh?
Not all, just the majority of them.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:14 pm to lsupride87
quote:she wouldn’t to have needed to swerve out the way or react if Lacy would’ve been following the law in the first place
So even though the white car driver broke the law and her breaking the law directly caused the death of someone else, she doesn’t have to accept any responsibility because Lacy made the truck brake?
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:15 pm to Ingeniero
I want to be clear: I did not write anything about anyone's race. You block quoting dnm3305's comment in replying to my post makes it appear as if I did. I know that it wasn't intentional, but I'd appreciate it if you could edit your post to fix that.
Probably not because that does not meet the definition of criminal negligence, which again is: such disregard of the interest of others that the offender's conduct amounts to a gross deviation below the standard of care expected to be maintained by a reasonably careful man under like circumstances.
The child you describe is not acting with disregard for the interests of others. A grown man speeding into oncoming traffic probably is.
quote:
if a kid had run out into the street and the truck brakes to avoid him, car crashes behind him, do we charge the kid with negligent homicide?
Probably not because that does not meet the definition of criminal negligence, which again is: such disregard of the interest of others that the offender's conduct amounts to a gross deviation below the standard of care expected to be maintained by a reasonably careful man under like circumstances.
The child you describe is not acting with disregard for the interests of others. A grown man speeding into oncoming traffic probably is.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:15 pm to dnm3305
Also, we are still glossing over the fact the police report is still 100% inaccurate and yall even admit as such
Directly from the report:
That is 100% a bold faced lie. Period. End of story. And it’s written that way purposefully instead of the truth
Ask yourself why the officer lied ?Why would they not say the truth “the kia served to avoid the truck that hit the brakes in front of it?”
Directly from the report:
quote:
2017 Kia Cadenza whose driver swerved left to avoid oncoming dodge charger”
That is 100% a bold faced lie. Period. End of story. And it’s written that way purposefully instead of the truth
Ask yourself why the officer lied ?Why would they not say the truth “the kia served to avoid the truck that hit the brakes in front of it?”
This post was edited on 10/7/25 at 12:19 pm
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:18 pm to lsupride87
quote:
2017 Kia Cadenza whose driver swerved left to avoid oncoming dodge charger” That is 100% a bold faced lie. Period. End of story. And it’s written that way purposefully instead of the truth
Youre correct. It would be more accurate to say…
“white cradenza whose driver swerved to not rear end the gold truck whom was braking to avoid oncoming dodge charger”
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:19 pm to lsupride87
quote:
If the white car was driving legally the man is 100% alive is more of a fact
That law is not very clear about proper distance.
RS 32:81 - The driver of a motor vehicle shall not follow another vehicle more closely than is reasonable and prudent, having due regard for the speed of such vehicle and the traffic upon and the condition of the highway.
Intelligent people can disagree as to whether or not it is reasonable and prudent for every driver to fully understand braking distance of their vehicle if a vehicle in front of them "slams on their brakes"
What the law is VERY clear about is proper lane usage and speeding. Those are clear violations that intelligent people cannot disagree about.
Even Lacy accepted his role in the accident. I have never called an attorney within 10 minutes of an accident as my first call. My first call would be to 911, and it wouldn't be 10 minutes after witnessing a head on collision. It would be instantly.
I Lacy actually believed your POV, he would have no need to contact an attorney. Not a single person who witnessed the accident moments before an investigator arrived (fresh memories) believed fault in the accident was anything other than the driver of the Challenger. Even Lacy didn't believe your account.
Your Matlock impression just doesn't negate the overwhelming facts to the contrary.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:19 pm to demtigers73
quote:
At 11:25 in this video the driver of the gold truck, states the lady in the car caused the wreck. The Trooper also tells him what to write in his sworn statement. Driver of the gold truck doesn't even mention Green Charger.
That state dick—wiggity whack.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:20 pm to dnm3305
quote:Its not “more accurate”. It’s simply the truth. The actual statement in the report is a clear lie and an absolute major factor in the homicide charge
Youre correct. It would be more accurate to say… “white cradenza whose driver swerved to not rear end the gold truck whom was braking to avoid oncoming dodge charger”
It’s not on accident the officer didn’t include the white vehicles lack of ability to simply brake and instead tried to make the chargers actions the direct reason it swerved into oncoming traffic
This post was edited on 10/7/25 at 12:21 pm
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:22 pm to civiltiger07
quote:
green charger obviously caused the lady to veer into the other lane.
really explain how?
Some a-hole was driving straight at her, speeding and passing cars in a no passing zone. So she was getting the hell out of his way. Hope that clears it up buddy.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:24 pm to WhodatTigerPel
Was just asking. So much going back and forth.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:26 pm to CrappyPants
fricking Lacy passed an 18 wheeler too. I hadn’t realized that before.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:26 pm to Dixie2023
I’d like to see a video simulation of this.
I think there is some blame on Lacy, but what about the lady that was tailgating I thought you always had to be in control when following someone and if they stop you better be prepared to stop too.
I think there is some blame on Lacy, but what about the lady that was tailgating I thought you always had to be in control when following someone and if they stop you better be prepared to stop too.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:26 pm to Hangover Haven
That idiot has no clue what he’s talking about
The truck driver who was giving his statement about what happened, rambled on for so long trying to make sense of what he himself just witnessed (totally normal reaction by the way, I get it), that the cop was trying to help him put what he saw into words
Only a moron or someone with an agenda would interpret that any other way
The truck driver who was giving his statement about what happened, rambled on for so long trying to make sense of what he himself just witnessed (totally normal reaction by the way, I get it), that the cop was trying to help him put what he saw into words
Only a moron or someone with an agenda would interpret that any other way
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:26 pm to crimsonsaint
quote:That isn’t accurate at all
Some a-hole was driving straight at her, speeding and passing cars in a no passing zone. So she was getting the hell out of his way. Hope that clears it up buddy.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:27 pm to Dixie2023
quote:
Was just asking. So much going back and forth.
typically, when a thread goes deeper than 3-4 pages on here it has devolved into a dick measuring contest between a couple of posters sniping at each other(usually political or racial,) and there is no longer discussion
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:28 pm to civiltiger07
quote:
wow that video is pretty embarrassing for the state police.
How so?
This post was edited on 10/7/25 at 12:29 pm
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:29 pm to crimsonsaint
quote:
Some a-hole was driving straight at her, speeding and passing cars in a no passing zone. So she was getting the hell out of his way. Hope that clears it up buddy.
She swerved to avoid rear ending a truck in front of her because she was driving like a moron too, following closely or closing in on his self proclaimed low rate of speed, and the truck braked.
Looking at the time stamps and time of impact, she never even saw the charger in her lane—driving that economy car riding a trucks arse prevented that, and in the truck diver’s words, she was swerving to avoid rear ending him when he braked and would never have seen the Charger because Lacy was back in his lane well ahead of her swerving—in his lane 92 yards from impact and 72 yards behind them in his designated late at time of impact
This post was edited on 10/7/25 at 1:00 pm
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:31 pm to The Third Leg
How fast was Lacy driving. Has that been determined?
Popular
Back to top



2




