- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/24/22 at 10:54 am to Salmon
quote:
every single anti abortion law will or does have an emergency contraceptive exception
all of these scenarios y'all keep coming up with are simply fear mongering
I have no issue with the SC overturning RvW and allowing individual states to make their own decisions. I'm simply stating that there may be some pregnancies that are not avoidable and those cases (while maybe rare) can't be ignored.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 10:55 am to Salmon
If a mother would be willing to abort a baby, but she is unable to due to law, what type of situation is that to be born into? Will this cause more or less societal problems?
Posted on 6/24/22 at 10:57 am to Sl0thstronautEsq
quote:
I'm simply stating that there may be some pregnancies that are not avoidable and those cases (while maybe rare) can't be ignored.
They can be avoided by taking immediate actions after the rape.
In the case that a person delays action due to whatever reason, they can still go to another state.
And if they can't get to another state, there will still be underground clinics.
Acting like people are going to be forced to have babies due to rape is nonsense.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 10:57 am to Alt26
quote:
Accountability. Learn it. Love it. Live it. If you are deeply concerned about not having the ability to get an abortion....then don't fricking get pregnant. There are numerous inexpensive and readily available means of PREVENTATIVE birth control. I'm sure there are many on here (well maybe not on the soccer board) who have been able to engage in sexual intercourse numerous times without such resulting in a pregnancy simply because they took steps to avoid that potential outcome on the FRONT end. Just a modicum of forethought and responsibility could complete eliminate being faced with making a "poor decision" on the back end.
Accountability to support these unwanted people will fall on those with financial means, not just those making the poor decisions.
This post was edited on 6/24/22 at 10:59 am
Posted on 6/24/22 at 10:58 am to WaWaWeeWa
OK. A woman's water breaks early in the pregnancy and she develops an infection inside the uterus.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 10:59 am to sabes que
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/24/22 at 11:53 am
Posted on 6/24/22 at 10:59 am to Salmon
quote:Whats your stance on rape abortion?
the right to life for the unborn child
Posted on 6/24/22 at 10:59 am to lsupride87
All this does is push this issue back to the states, where it belongs.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 10:59 am to Salmon
quote:I believe most jurisdictions offer the victim Plan B immediately after the medical exam and I don't have a problem with that.
They can be avoided by taking immediate actions after the rape.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 10:59 am to Jim Rockford
quote:
OTOH you would be surprised at the number of women who have had abortions, some you would never guess in a million years. Others who would at least like to have the option, just in case.
At the end of the day, this is an issue that affects women, who vote their emotions. It will 100% drive many women to vote for whichever party promises to give them back a "right" which was taken away. Anyone who chooses to think expensive gas or home prices will outweigh that doesn't understand women at all.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 11:00 am to sabes que
quote:
If a mother would be willing to abort a baby, but she is unable to due to law, what type of situation is that to be born into? Will this cause more or less societal problems?
I don't know. Seems very specific to the person and their situation.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 11:00 am to Cregg
quote:
Gonna be one wild weekend
Honestly would have been a lot worse if it hadn’t been leaked. People knew this was for sure coming eventually
Posted on 6/24/22 at 11:01 am to Vamos Brandonos
quote:Jesus Christ. Some classic sexism there.
At the end of the day, this is an issue that affects women, who vote their emotions
Posted on 6/24/22 at 11:02 am to lsupride87
quote:
Whats your stance on rape abortion?
I don't have a problem with abortion due to rape.
Its a terrible circumstance and the woman's right to choice was stripped of her.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 11:02 am to Vamos Brandonos
quote:
Not for November it isn't.
There are three groups.
1. Psychos who think killing unborn babies is a right.
2. People who don't have a strong opinion either way but answer polling questions on the side of it should be legal some of the time.
3. People who know abortion is terrible and should be outlawed in all cases.
Only one of those groups will allow this decision to affect their vote come November.
This post was edited on 6/24/22 at 11:43 am
Posted on 6/24/22 at 11:02 am to kywildcatfanone
quote:
All this does is push this issue back to the states, where it belongs.
This 100%. It really is that simple. Anyone screeching about this decision is a very low-IQ individual.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 11:03 am to stout
quote:
So then you agree with me that killing a baby will do nothing to help some people achieve any form of upward mobility.
There’s a really funny article written by WaPo as a “gotcha” against states enacting abortion laws. What the don’t realize is the dire awful situation they attempt to paint glosses over the fact that this girl’s life is now improved because she didn’t have an abortion.
WaPo: Texas teen wanted abortion, now she has twins
It’s behind a paywall. One i don’t pay for, but the of the gist of the story is this 17 year old high school dropout met a skater boy, fell in love, got pregnant.
The skater boy worked as a dishwasher at a local restaurant and had 0 aspirations before this happened. So, as a decent young man, he married her, joined the Navy, got them insurance, and now has a steady job.
Now, obviously this isn’t going to work out for everyone, but it’s hilarious that WaPo chose this story as a gotcha and attempted to ignore that the outcome was 2 healthy twins and a young family with a shot in life now.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 11:05 am to Grievous Angel
quote:
I'll throw in the "age of viability" argument. That somehow the decision should be based upon "when the fetus could survive outside the womb."
What difference does this make? How many 3 year olds do you know that are "viable" without the care of another human being?
There is confusion because the term 'fetal viability' is different from the vernacular use of 'viability.' Despite the difference, there is some differences in how 'fetal viability' is defined. It's mainly related to fetal lung development, which starts around week 20-22, and that informs the WHO's definition, while other definitions define it as post-26 weeks.
Popular
Back to top


1










