View in: Desktop
Copyright @2023 TigerDroppings.com. All rights reserved.
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Posted by
Message
NPR Claims ‘Limited Scientific Evidence’ Men Have ‘Physical Advantage’ over Women in Sport
Posted by hellsu


Link will not paste. You'll have to trust me.
National Public Radio (NPR) claimed that “there is limited scientific research” supporting the idea that biological males have a “physical advantage” over biological females in competitive sports.
The media organization made the claim after the World Athletics Council, the governing sports body regulating international competitions such as cross county as well as track field, ruled that transgender athletes would be barred from competing against biological women.
The publicly-funded media company cited a 2020 report by Human Rights Watch claiming that transgender women have no competitive edge over biological women when it comes to physical performance and insisted that the World Athletic Council’s ruling relied on flawed evidence.
“Even without strong evidence of an advantage,” NPR noted, “the council has scrutinized the performance of athletes such as South African runner Caster Semenya, the world’s fastest woman in the 800 meters.”
Semenya, a female athlete, was described by NPR as “raised female and . . . legally female, [who] was born with XY chromosomes and has a naturally high testosterone level.”
NPR pointed to the World Athletics Council’s decision as part of a growing trend of “moving away from trans inclusion” in sports citing the governing bodies for international swimming and rugby announcing similar moves in recent years.
On Thursday, World Athletics Council president Sebastian Coe announced the body’s decision to bar transgender women from female competition.
“The Council has agreed to exclude male-to-female transgender athletes, who have been through male puberty, from female world-ranking competitions from March the 31st of this year,” Coe said during a press conference in Monaco.
“We cannot, in all conscience, leave our transgender regulations as they were at five nanomoles per liter for at least one year when we were unsure about the impact of doing so across all our disciplines.”
The news was welcomed by Karen Long, an Australian runner that competes in 100, 200, and 400-meter races.
“It was a relief to hear that transgender athletes will be banned from competing in the women’s category in athletics. I believe the governing bodies received lots of pressure in the form of complaints from female and male athletes on this issue and it forced them to reconsider,” Long to National Review.
Cynthia Monteleone, a fellow runner who is competing in a World Masters Athletics competition in Poland this weekend, recounted an earlier experience when she realized that at a 2018 track meet one of the contestants was born male.
“Nobody would answer my questions. The officials were very concerned about it, the European officials, but when I brought it up to Team USA management, they just swept it under the rug and later down the line even went as far as to say that for my own safety, I should keep my mouth shut, which I didn’t,” the reigning 400-meter race champion said.
Prior to Thursday’s ban, World Athletics required transgender women to reduce the amount of testosterone in their blood below a certain threshold, which they needed to maintain continuously for a year before competing against biological women. These rules will now be paused as a working group is appointed to further investigate the matter, the BBC reported.
“The science is clear that trans women retain a significant advantage over women and to maintain the integrity of women’s sports, it’s common sense that they should not be racing against women,” added Long. “Having their own category OR run with the men in an open category would be a fairer way to include them in the competition.”
NPR is our friend.
Left is right and up is down and the world goes round and round.
National Public Radio (NPR) claimed that “there is limited scientific research” supporting the idea that biological males have a “physical advantage” over biological females in competitive sports.
The media organization made the claim after the World Athletics Council, the governing sports body regulating international competitions such as cross county as well as track field, ruled that transgender athletes would be barred from competing against biological women.
The publicly-funded media company cited a 2020 report by Human Rights Watch claiming that transgender women have no competitive edge over biological women when it comes to physical performance and insisted that the World Athletic Council’s ruling relied on flawed evidence.
“Even without strong evidence of an advantage,” NPR noted, “the council has scrutinized the performance of athletes such as South African runner Caster Semenya, the world’s fastest woman in the 800 meters.”
Semenya, a female athlete, was described by NPR as “raised female and . . . legally female, [who] was born with XY chromosomes and has a naturally high testosterone level.”
NPR pointed to the World Athletics Council’s decision as part of a growing trend of “moving away from trans inclusion” in sports citing the governing bodies for international swimming and rugby announcing similar moves in recent years.
On Thursday, World Athletics Council president Sebastian Coe announced the body’s decision to bar transgender women from female competition.
“The Council has agreed to exclude male-to-female transgender athletes, who have been through male puberty, from female world-ranking competitions from March the 31st of this year,” Coe said during a press conference in Monaco.
“We cannot, in all conscience, leave our transgender regulations as they were at five nanomoles per liter for at least one year when we were unsure about the impact of doing so across all our disciplines.”
The news was welcomed by Karen Long, an Australian runner that competes in 100, 200, and 400-meter races.
“It was a relief to hear that transgender athletes will be banned from competing in the women’s category in athletics. I believe the governing bodies received lots of pressure in the form of complaints from female and male athletes on this issue and it forced them to reconsider,” Long to National Review.
Cynthia Monteleone, a fellow runner who is competing in a World Masters Athletics competition in Poland this weekend, recounted an earlier experience when she realized that at a 2018 track meet one of the contestants was born male.
“Nobody would answer my questions. The officials were very concerned about it, the European officials, but when I brought it up to Team USA management, they just swept it under the rug and later down the line even went as far as to say that for my own safety, I should keep my mouth shut, which I didn’t,” the reigning 400-meter race champion said.
Prior to Thursday’s ban, World Athletics required transgender women to reduce the amount of testosterone in their blood below a certain threshold, which they needed to maintain continuously for a year before competing against biological women. These rules will now be paused as a working group is appointed to further investigate the matter, the BBC reported.
“The science is clear that trans women retain a significant advantage over women and to maintain the integrity of women’s sports, it’s common sense that they should not be racing against women,” added Long. “Having their own category OR run with the men in an open category would be a fairer way to include them in the competition.”

NPR is our friend.
Left is right and up is down and the world goes round and round.
This post was edited on 3/25 at 4:00 pm
re: NPR Claims ‘Limited Scientific Evidence’ Men Have ‘Physical Advantage’ over Women in SportPosted by LegendInMyMind on 3/25/23 at 3:54 pm to hellsu

re: NPR Claims ‘Limited Scientific Evidence’ Men Have ‘Physical Advantage’ over Women in SportPosted by Darth_Vader
on 3/25/23 at 4:05 pm to hellsu

Let’s put it to the test.
1. Let’s put a football team together of the apex female athletes from around the world.
2. Give them a full year to practice and gel as a team
3. Hold a regulation game between this all-girl football team and Thompson High School from Alabama.
Let the chips fall where they may.
1. Let’s put a football team together of the apex female athletes from around the world.
2. Give them a full year to practice and gel as a team
3. Hold a regulation game between this all-girl football team and Thompson High School from Alabama.
Let the chips fall where they may.
re: NPR Claims ‘Limited Scientific Evidence’ Men Have ‘Physical Advantage’ over Women in SportPosted by OWLFAN86
on 3/25/23 at 4:06 pm to Darth_Vader

OR
we can refuse to entertain such lunacy
we can refuse to entertain such lunacy
re: NPR Claims ‘Limited Scientific Evidence’ Men Have ‘Physical Advantage’ over Women in SportPosted by LSU Grad Alabama Fan
on 3/25/23 at 4:09 pm to hellsu

Who had Lia Thomas ranked as the #1 swimmer? Just curious.
TD Sponsor
TD Fan
USA
Member since 2001

USA
Member since 2001
Thank you for supporting our sponsors Posted by Site Sponsor
to Everyone


Advertisement
re: NPR Claims ‘Limited Scientific Evidence’ Men Have ‘Physical Advantage’ over Women in SportPosted by SoFla Tideroller
on 3/25/23 at 4:11 pm to hellsu


Why the hell are our tax dollars funding NPR?
re: NPR Claims ‘Limited Scientific Evidence’ Men Have ‘Physical Advantage’ over Women in SportPosted by BestBanker
on 3/25/23 at 4:12 pm to hellsu

quote:
NPR Claims
Stopped reading there.
quote:
Do we really need randomized controlled trials to believe our own eyes?
You'd think historical data would be enough.
Comparisons of:
Max weight lifted
Quickest time for a run/swim/cycle
Furthest distance a shotput was thrown
Etc.
quote:
National Public Radio (NPR) claimed that “there is limited scientific research” supporting the idea that biological males have a “physical advantage” over biological females in competitive sports.
Guess physical advantage doesn't include lifting heavy objects or even opening jars.
re: NPR Claims ‘Limited Scientific Evidence’ Men Have ‘Physical Advantage’ over Women in SportPosted by theGarnetWay
on 3/25/23 at 4:19 pm to hellsu

Didn't the 203rd ranked male tennis player beat the Williams sisters in back to back? And I think Serena has been on the record as saying that she would be crushed in the men's game because of their speed and how hard they hit.
re: NPR Claims ‘Limited Scientific Evidence’ Men Have ‘Physical Advantage’ over Women in SportPosted by Klark Kent
on 3/25/23 at 4:19 pm to hellsu



didn’t we just have a OT poster try to convince me that NPR wasn’t left leaning at all?
re: NPR Claims ‘Limited Scientific Evidence’ Men Have ‘Physical Advantage’ over Women in SportPosted by East Coast Band
on 3/25/23 at 4:21 pm to hellsu

Well, then allow me to provide my own personal "limited scientific evidence".
I was a decent high school sprinter. Made it to the state finals. Pretty good for high school. But that's all. No more.
Comparatively, my times in the sprint races were at, or better, than the world record, for women.
So, essentially an average state level sprinter would be winning Olympic gold medals running in a women's race.
I was a decent high school sprinter. Made it to the state finals. Pretty good for high school. But that's all. No more.
Comparatively, my times in the sprint races were at, or better, than the world record, for women.
So, essentially an average state level sprinter would be winning Olympic gold medals running in a women's race.
re: NPR Claims ‘Limited Scientific Evidence’ Men Have ‘Physical Advantage’ over Women in SportPosted by DavidTheGnome on 3/25/23 at 4:22 pm to bad93ex
quote:
Defund NPR
Not that simple. NPR doesn't actually receive direct federal funding but instead gets grants and such. But even then that just amounts to 2% of their budget. Honestly I'm not sure why they keep that still since it's so contentious and such a small amount of their budget overall.
Popular
Back to top
