Started By
Message

re: Investigators When they KNEW Murdaugh lied (Page 112)

Posted on 1/30/23 at 4:45 pm to
Posted by pjk481
Member since Sep 2011
535 posts
Posted on 1/30/23 at 4:45 pm to
Thought he said "they"; it was not very clear
Posted by rt3
now in the piney woods of Pineville
Member since Apr 2011
140990 posts
Posted on 1/30/23 at 5:29 pm to
quote:

Thought he said "they"; it was not very clear

on Rekieta's stream... someone in the chat said they went back and listened to it again a couple more times and also heard "they"
Posted by CobraCommander83
Member since Feb 2017
11532 posts
Posted on 1/30/23 at 6:36 pm to
I replayed it a couple of times but I swear he said I.

Here is the clip.

Audio Clip
This post was edited on 1/30/23 at 6:41 pm
Posted by pjk481
Member since Sep 2011
535 posts
Posted on 1/30/23 at 6:46 pm to
It’s definitely muffled. Honestly live I didn’t pick up either way. Then thought they. But to me it’s “they did him so bad”

Heard others in comments say they thought his muffled comment was “uhh…did him so bad”
This post was edited on 1/30/23 at 6:49 pm
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
140462 posts
Posted on 1/30/23 at 6:52 pm to
quote:

all cummunications with

quote:

cummunications
wut
Posted by CobraCommander83
Member since Feb 2017
11532 posts
Posted on 1/30/23 at 7:02 pm to
quote:

It’s definitely muffled. Honestly live I didn’t pick up either way. Then thought they. But to me it’s “they did him so bad” Heard others in comments say they thought his muffled comment was “uhh…did him so bad”


I’ll be curious how the defense responds to it tomorrow. That clip went viral really fast. People arguing he said they or I. I thought the prosecution did a good job rebounding from this morning. They are doing a good job laying their foundation but they still have a lot to prove that AM indeed killed Paul and Maggie. Starting to get in the meat and potatoes of the trial.
Posted by real turf fan
East Tennessee
Member since Dec 2016
8591 posts
Posted on 1/30/23 at 7:03 pm to
quote:

Maggie's phone was located away from the crime scene. Croft and other agents found it between a quarter and half mile away from the scene in a grassy area on the side of Moselle Road.


Heck, what happened to the dog with the hurt tail that was the reason for some of the calls?
Posted by real turf fan
East Tennessee
Member since Dec 2016
8591 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 9:09 am to
Posted by CobraCommander83
Member since Feb 2017
11532 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 9:39 am to
I still think there was more than one person involved and helped Alex. I could be wrong but Alex doesn’t seem smart enough to carry out the murders on his own. He is sleezy and has had so much power all of his life. He knows and has people that will help carry out dirty work. Look at Cousin Eddie.
Posted by rt3
now in the piney woods of Pineville
Member since Apr 2011
140990 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 9:44 am to
That's some My Cousin Vinny type shite except this witness does want to admit he needs some thicker glasses... or in this case a better hearing aid
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
28156 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 9:45 am to
quote:

It’s definitely muffled. Honestly live I didn’t pick up either way. Then thought they. But to me it’s “they did him so bad”

Heard others in comments say they thought his muffled comment was “uhh…did him so bad”

First time hearing I heard I. Then they. Then “uhh…did him so bad”. I think it's vague enough to not be dispositive.
Posted by CobraCommander83
Member since Feb 2017
11532 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 9:46 am to
Defense slowed down the clip at 1/3 speed to argue Alex said they and not I. When I listen to it normally, I can see the mixed results. If I listen to it normally with the speaker close to my ear, I hear I.
Posted by rt3
now in the piney woods of Pineville
Member since Apr 2011
140990 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 9:58 am to
As Rekieta so rightfully points out... if the investigator hears "I did him so bad"... that would be followed up on IMMEDIATELY... not a month later

That would be a tacit admission and the investigator would want the suspect to talk on that topic more

The fact thus investigator didn't is either A) bad questioning skills or B) he didn't hear "I did him so bad"
Posted by ILurkThereforeIAm
In the Shadows, Behind Hedges
Member since Aug 2020
480 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 10:05 am to
I was leaning toward "I" but it's definitely not clear.

I think this is the first trial I've watched since OJ, and it's hard to follow what point they're trying to make sometimes with the hours of questioning. I'm working while I listen to it, so I don't know if it's just because I'm not focused on it, but I still need another source to recap it at the end of the day.

The questions about the guns and the casings have me completely lost. What is the prosecuton getting at? The audio clips are pretty informative and I can form an opinion based on what I'm hearing AM say, but listening to hundreds of questions without a summary of the prosecution's point is confusing.
Posted by lachellie
LALA Land
Member since Aug 2012
1012 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 10:09 am to
quote:

That would be a tacit admission
That would be a tack-it admission?
Posted by rt3
now in the piney woods of Pineville
Member since Apr 2011
140990 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 10:13 am to
quote:

That would be a tack-it admission?

Objecshun

GROUNZ
Posted by lachellie
LALA Land
Member since Aug 2012
1012 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 10:13 am to
quote:

As Rekieta so rightfully points out... if the investigator hears "I did him so bad"... that would be followed up on IMMEDIATELY... not a month later


It’s blatantly obvious these people were being handled with kid gloves. The body-cam footage from search of gun room shows them lounging around discussing autopsies and funeral arrangements. Anyone else’s home would have been crime scene taped off that night. And they went to the brother’s hunting lodge to interview AM, Buster and the brothers three days later? Again, anyone else would have been asked to visit the police station for that.
Posted by CobraCommander83
Member since Feb 2017
11532 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 10:21 am to
quote:

The questions about the guns and the casings have me completely lost. What is the prosecuton getting at?


It is confusing but I assume the point they are trying to prove that the guns used in the murders didn’t come from the outside but from AM. I think it brings up some very good points but without the actual guns used, it will be difficult to fully prove. My opinion is that guns used did come from AM/property. The casings found match old casings found around the property and match what was stored in the house. I just don’t see it being a coincidence that a random person would be using the exact type/brand ammo to carry out the murders
Posted by rt3
now in the piney woods of Pineville
Member since Apr 2011
140990 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 10:22 am to
Now they're seizing random shell casings 4 months after the fact?
Posted by CobraCommander83
Member since Feb 2017
11532 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 10:28 am to
quote:

The body-cam footage from search of gun room shows them lounging around discussing autopsies and funeral arrangements.


That puzzled me. It was still part of the crime scene and they were allowed to hang out in the gun room. A lot of tampering could have happened. I know LE was not perfect in searching/handling the scene at the kennels. Things like that will happen but I found it unacceptable that family/friends/personal lawyers was allowed to hang out in the house when it was not fully searched completely. It would take much for there to be a piece of evidence that one of them could have picked up and put in their vehicle.
Jump to page
Page First 11 12 13 14 15 ... 112
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 13 of 112Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram