Started By
Message

re: Hollywood Is ‘Hot, Horny and White’ Again

Posted on 8/12/25 at 12:24 am to
Posted by Lou Loomis
A pond. Ponds good for you.
Member since Mar 2025
1978 posts
Posted on 8/12/25 at 12:24 am to
[quote]I have a feeling in a few years there will be a documentary on how much shite was funded[/

All that crazy far left lunatic garbage will drop off in a big way. Everything was state sponsored propaganda. Soviet style propaganda. All the crazy lefty loon shite that was shoved down your throat but you thought it was insane. You were right.

The trans crap, the George Floyd riots, the Covid insanity was all bs. Hardly anybody cares about that shite. Hell, the Democrat party would have 30% support if it wasn’t propped up by USAID.
Posted by Sunnyvale
Little ST. James
Member since Feb 2024
3340 posts
Posted on 8/12/25 at 12:32 am to
I wish I was 45 and built like Tom Brady
Posted by sqerty
AP
Member since May 2022
8480 posts
Posted on 8/12/25 at 12:53 am to
With inflation I would've thought he would get more. Those are his 90s spec script prices. Probably because of relevancy.
Posted by Lacreus
30A
Member since Aug 2025
680 posts
Posted on 8/12/25 at 1:43 am to
Political ideologies come and go in Hollywood but that doesn’t mean whether or not a film is actually going to be “good”.

The movie industry has changed so much with the advent of streaming services that production companies have become less inclined to make original stories that people will want to watch over and over again. It’s why so many films now all look and sound same. Matt Damon has talked about this numerous times.
This post was edited on 8/12/25 at 1:50 am
Posted by Tarps99
Lafourche Parish
Member since Apr 2017
12752 posts
Posted on 8/12/25 at 2:28 am to
quote:

Have they officially run out of new ideas?


Sadly this is true. Even back in the 1970’s, they were dusting off old scripts or buying the rights to old movies from the previous movie generation. Heck the movie Airplane was a reboot or remake of the movie Zero Hour. They just adopted a new script to make the jokes fit more for the time.


The big thing about remakes or continuing a movie franchise is that it can be guaranteed money. You have a built in audience that is expected to go watch it at its most profitable release at the movie theater.

Of course now with the wide array of entertainment options from TV and streaming services and fewer movie theaters, it is hard for a new movie to have a breakout success.


Take for instance Smokey and the Bandit, it was the 2nd highest grossing film of 1977 behind Star Wars. Northern audiences hated it at first, but it had a decent showing in the south and got a wider release later in the summer across the entire US.

Antecedently, people say this movie only made money because most cinemas had just a few screens back then, so if Star Wars was sold out, and you were going to the movies, you were going to watch something regardless of the title. Now there are cinema multiplexes with 10-20 or more screens so they can accommodate more viewings of Star Wars at different times since movie theaters now have digital projectors now instead of a film projectors.
Posted by SouthEndzoneTiger
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2008
11621 posts
Posted on 8/12/25 at 7:26 am to
quote:

While I’m glad to hear that the trend of movies being little more than thinly veiled leftist propaganda pieces, I will say I’m getting tired of Hollywood jsit rebooting old movies. Have they officially run out of new ideas?


I understand your sentiment. And yes, maybe they are "running out of ideas". But I kind of find the re-boots interesting. Especially the remakes of very old stuff, like from my childhood. Where the technology is better (as far as sci-fi type stuff) or just the fact that times have changed. So you get an 80s movie concept that takes place in current times. I find it interesting. Even if it is just a sequel, like Top Gun or Gladiator.
Posted by TigerHornII
Member since Feb 2021
1161 posts
Posted on 8/12/25 at 7:46 am to
quote:

The argument is that no one is watching movies.


The definition of "no one" is purely financial. Head count is irrelevant, unless it's a government-funded welfare program for Hollywood.

It's a business. It has to make a profit, or it will die, even with Hollywood Accounting. If "no one" is a sizable group that still isn't enough to make a profit, then it's an L for Hollywood, sort of like losing 35-40. 'necks had plenty of TDs (people in seats), but it cost them more than what they gained. It was an L.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
60953 posts
Posted on 8/12/25 at 7:56 am to
quote:

1. A Minecraft Movie Warner Bros. $423,949,195

2. Lilo & Stitch Disney $421,614,672

3. Superman Warner Bros. $331,394,652

4. Jurassic World Rebirth Universal $326,944,830

5. Sinners Warner Bros. $278,578,513

6. How to Train Your Dragon Universal $261,598,255

7. The Fantastic Four: First Steps Disney $230,697,476

8. Captain America: Brave New World $200,500,001

9. Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning Paramount $197,355,354

10. Thunderbolts* Disney $190,267,874


I don’t really have a bone in this fight. However, given the inflated price of tickets, these numbers really suck relative to past movie successes.
Posted by This GUN for HIRE
Member since May 2022
6091 posts
Posted on 8/12/25 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

Head count is irrelevant


first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram