Started By
Message

Exxon and Chevron shareholders cut support for climate resolutions

Posted on 5/31/23 at 8:17 pm
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
21150 posts
Posted on 5/31/23 at 8:17 pm
quote:

ExxonMobil and Chevron shareholders solidly rejected climate change proposals at the US oil majors’ annual meetings on Wednesday, scaling back support from last year and splitting with results at peers in Europe where resolutions related to global warming have won stronger support.

Only 11 percent of Exxon shareholders supported a petition calling for the company to set emissions reduction targets that would be consistent with the goals of the 2015 Paris climate agreement. A similar proposal at Chevron received less than 10 percent support.

The vote tallies highlight differences between shareholder support for climate change action at US and European oil companies. Last week, 20 per cent of Shell’s shareholders voted against the company’s energy transition plan, arguing that it was not enough to reduce emissions. At BP in April, 17 per cent of shareholders backed a resolution to force the company to reduce its oil and gas output faster.

Unlike BP and Shell, the US oil majors have resisted setting targets for emissions from consumer use of their products because they would in effect force the companies to start reducing oil and natural gas production. Both of the companies plan to increase output, and last week Chevron spent $6.3bn to acquire US shale producer PDC Energy, adding new oil and gas reserves.


quote:

In the US, where Republicans have attacked asset managers’ voting behaviours, investor support for climate action has lost momentum. Last year, the Paris alignment shareholder proposals received 28 per cent and 33 per cent support at Exxon and Chevron, respectively, according to Dutch shareholder activist Follow This, which filed these petitions again this year.


quote:

The votes came after a change in public perceptions over the past year, as Russia’s war in Ukraine drove up fuel prices and gave renewed emphasis to energy security alongside protecting the climate.


quote:

On Wednesday, Exxon and Chevron faced 13 shareholder proposals related to carbon emissions or climate change. Only one petition received more than 20 per cent support, a threshold regarded as a strong sign of investor dissent. About 36 per cent of shareholders supported a proposal asking Exxon to report more about its methane emissions.


quote:

Exxon fired back at van Baal, arguing he has said publicly that his shareholder proposal is meant to be a “Trojan horse” to force companies to eliminate oil and natural gas investments. 


LINK
Posted by Water
Louisiana
Member since Jan 2020
729 posts
Posted on 5/31/23 at 8:19 pm to
Drill, baby, drill!
Posted by back9Tiger
Mandeville, LA.
Member since Nov 2005
14130 posts
Posted on 5/31/23 at 8:20 pm to
So investors want their money, not chase rainbows and unicorns.
Posted by SteelerBravesDawg
Member since Sep 2020
34326 posts
Posted on 5/31/23 at 8:20 pm to
Good.
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69895 posts
Posted on 5/31/23 at 8:31 pm to
As a shareholder in both companies, I am pleased to have voted with the majority.

Fossil fuels and Nuclear are the fricking best, and it's not even close.


Posted by WylieTiger
Member since Nov 2006
12933 posts
Posted on 5/31/23 at 8:35 pm to
The rest of it is a grift.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
37423 posts
Posted on 5/31/23 at 8:35 pm to
quote:

Fossil fuels and Nuclear are the fricking best, and it's not even close.


Have done more for the betterment of our society than damn near anything.
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
120165 posts
Posted on 5/31/23 at 8:35 pm to
quote:

As a shareholder in both companies, I am pleased to have voted with the majority.


Same

Proud owner of 300 shares CVX and 500 shares XOM
Posted by Gifman
by the mountains
Member since Jan 2021
9220 posts
Posted on 5/31/23 at 8:36 pm to
We need to increase emissions
Posted by killedbyindians
Earth
Member since Jun 2022
1160 posts
Posted on 5/31/23 at 9:36 pm to
Scientists have said there are no fossils below 16000 ft. And wells today are much deeper than that so why the hell do we call it “fossil” fuels other than to give people the impression that it’s gonna run out.
Posted by GREENHEAD22
Member since Nov 2009
19582 posts
Posted on 5/31/23 at 10:20 pm to
Wish they would have made the vote a little more public, I would have liked to have voted.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118636 posts
Posted on 5/31/23 at 10:36 pm to
A little sanity in a sea of derangement. It’s tough out there folks. Stay strong corporate leaders.
Posted by LSUDad
Still on the move
Member since May 2004
58660 posts
Posted on 6/1/23 at 1:35 am to
A little help here!

LINK
Posted by GeauxWrek
Somewhere b/w Houston and BR
Member since Sep 2010
4293 posts
Posted on 6/1/23 at 5:20 am to
quote:

Scientists have said there are no fossils below 16000 ft. And wells today are much deeper than that so why the hell do we call it “fossil” fuels other than to give people the impression that it’s gonna run out.
The same reason it went from global warming to climate change. The same reason you say some one passed instead of died. They are controlling you sheep via language they are choosing.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98453 posts
Posted on 6/1/23 at 5:27 am to


Now...we just need some shareholders to initiate lawsuits against them for their ESG bullshite for breach of fiduciary duties, since it is clearly contrary to the will of the OWNERS of the company
Posted by Potchafa
Avoyelles
Member since Jul 2016
3172 posts
Posted on 6/1/23 at 7:40 am to
Just came in from a 21 day hitch with more money in bank! Deepwater drilling is wide open.! Bb
Posted by Joe D Grinder
Member since Jun 2014
832 posts
Posted on 6/1/23 at 7:44 am to
quote:

As a shareholder in both companies, I am pleased to have voted with the majority

Same
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
10342 posts
Posted on 6/1/23 at 7:52 am to
This is all some sort of global high jacked energy policy.

Ask these climatistas about the mining of the metals needed for these batteries… and they don’t have a clue .

They don’t know if the dangers to human life nor the impact on the earth that they’re mined from.

This post was edited on 6/1/23 at 7:54 am
Posted by Hetfield
Dallas
Member since Jun 2013
6977 posts
Posted on 6/1/23 at 8:19 am to
This is what I tell my liberal friends…..”Until China, India, & Russia start abiding by the same rules as the USA then no deal.”
Posted by HeadSlash
TEAM LIVE BADASS - St. GEORGE
Member since Aug 2006
49504 posts
Posted on 6/1/23 at 8:49 am to
quote:

So investors want their money, not chase rainbows and unicorns.


first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram