Started By
Message

re: Experts finally admitting that Tigerdroppings was right all along

Posted on 4/6/20 at 9:20 am to
Posted by TigerMuskyFanMinneso
Boonies, MN
Member since Sep 2019
759 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 9:20 am to
Thanks for the link -- note they are a bit more realistic re the Gump's in Bama!!

BUT THESE MODELS ARE STILL OVERSTATING!

They use data that rely too heavily on tyhe first cases -- the least healthy 5-10% of thge population

There will be nothing but good news all this week and the media and Task Force will attribute it all to the shutdown when in fact it's because their models way overstated the magnitude and duration!! Not at all clear the shutdown had any real impact.....

Posted by PearlJam
NotBeardEaves
Member since Aug 2014
13908 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 9:20 am to
quote:

There are going to be so many idiots eating their words after this!
No there isn't. Idiots are going to use confirmation bias and act like pompous jackasses to those they disagreed with (regardless of where they fall on the issues).
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
295485 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 9:21 am to
quote:

The decisions were made based on estimates that now appear to be way overblown


Politicians reacted to the worst possible case scenario. That's no way to govern. Prepare for the worst does not mean shutting down society and people's livelihood unless absolutely necessary.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
78022 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 9:21 am to
Aren't the graphs better because of the distancing? Wasn't the purpose of distancing to make those earlier graphs wrong?
Posted by shawnlsu
Member since Nov 2011
23682 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 9:22 am to
quote:

ell_13

Can't see the forest for the trees.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
295485 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 9:22 am to
quote:

Aren't the graphs better because of the distancing?


Most considered various scenarios.
Posted by MusclesofBrussels
Member since Dec 2015
4935 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 9:22 am to
quote:

First, I'm not an expert is statistics. I don't have much of a background in it




That is very clear from your posts
Posted by shawnlsu
Member since Nov 2011
23682 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 9:24 am to
quote:

Aren't the graphs better because of the distancing? Wasn't the purpose of distancing to make those earlier graphs wrong?

Yes, but some will never admit that.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
295485 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 9:25 am to
quote:

Yes, but some will never admit that.


Are you saying these projections excluded dstancing? If so, you're wrong.
This post was edited on 4/6/20 at 9:28 am
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
42429 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 9:25 am to
quote:

That is very clear from your posts


But his first line in every post is, “Thats not the way this works...”

Posted by PearlJam
NotBeardEaves
Member since Aug 2014
13908 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 9:26 am to
quote:

That is very clear from your posts
His posts have been logical and he has clearly laid out his thoughts. If you disagree, why not lose the emoticons and throw away one liners and engage in actual substantive discussion.
This post was edited on 4/6/20 at 9:31 am
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
87180 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 9:29 am to
You didn’t address anything I said.

Answer this one question for me... If it’s “reckless and careless” for my kid to play with a friend on the weekends. Just one kid. Why isn’t it reckless for me to send him to school in August 5 days a week with 500+ other kids? When we know we won’t have a vaccine? What if his grandparents haven’t been exposed yet?

You see what we have done here? With no criteria or actual plan in place, we have now put ourselves in a corner. All our leaders and politicians cared about was looking like they were doing something without true regard for the consequences. And then it was an arms race between mayors and governors to see who could cancel their areas for longer and to a higher extent. We shut things down when just a few people were dying per day. How can they justify to the mass media and a hysterical, irrational public to open things back up when 100 people are still dying per day? I know deaths isn’t the number to use to make this decision. But the public (people like you) is stupid.
Posted by touchdownjeebus
Member since Sep 2010
26033 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 9:30 am to
quote:

However, expect restrictions to continue until a vaccine is administered to everyone.


Just open the fricking gyms.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
295485 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 9:30 am to
quote:

They use data that rely too heavily on tyhe first cases -- the least healthy 5-10% of thge population


I don't blame doctors or statisticians, I blame the policy makers who panicked.
Posted by shawnlsu
Member since Nov 2011
23682 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 9:34 am to
No need, your statement said all I need to know about you.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
51974 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 9:35 am to
quote:

The experts are using data and plugging them into models. They have said all along the models will change as additional data is collected. This isn't surprising to anyone that understands this beyond just a surface level.

Why did I know (and a bunch of others) five days before the experts? I'm talking to NOLA area ICU doctors three days ago, and they are telling me it's already peaked. Meanwhile the experts, and their models, are saying it's six days hence.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
51974 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 9:37 am to
quote:

This is factually incorrect. The range is the range. You keep using the upper limits to judge the entire range.

No, I'm not. I never once used the upper limit. I DID use the mean (or average) which is their "most likely" prediction. I've already explained why the "range" defense is not justified. I'm not going to understand it for you.
Posted by L5UT1ger
Member since Feb 2004
2974 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 9:38 am to
Further, dont we have more information to go by for hurricanes than we did for this?

As for as the analogy seatbelts v. not driving, what seatbelts were available for this? Not being fat and old? pretty hard to go from old to young at all, and fat to healthy as quickly as putting on a seatbelt.

Not driving = restricting exposure to wrecking
the crap we are doing = restricting exposure to sickness.

Posted by IAmNERD
Member since May 2017
23710 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 9:38 am to
quote:

Now she is telling us not to go to a drugstore unless you must.
When will I ever go to a drugstore if I didn’t have to go?

This has been one of my favorite things during all of this. Do people have so much free time on their hands that they are just going to drugstores and Walmart or a grocery store just to hang out? I mean, I don't go anywhere or do anything unless I have to in my everyday life.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112623 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 9:39 am to
quote:

Nearly every single metric has fallen within the range (including projected peaks).
Well the range is between 3 and 3 millions, so let's hold up on giving them a W there.
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram