- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Disney pushes critical race theory on staff, teaches them to reject equality
Posted on 5/9/21 at 9:54 am to Saint Alfonzo
Posted on 5/9/21 at 9:54 am to Saint Alfonzo
quote:
Do you think race relations in the US are not complicated?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No, they're not.
Democrats complicate race relations because it provides them a huge benefit.
Dems don't want to help black folks become independent, they need them poor and outraged.
Posted on 5/9/21 at 9:55 am to HempHead
quote:Except not
Hence, tokenism or networking.
Posted on 5/9/21 at 9:57 am to Gravitiger
quote:
Except not
Please, tell me about the extraordinary labor market for people with advanced degrees in the social sciences.
Posted on 5/9/21 at 10:00 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Democrats complicate race relations because it provides them a huge benefit. Dems don't want to help black folks become independent, they need them poor and outraged.
That's why they spin shite like CRT. Obfuscate their own racism, blame everyone else.
Posted on 5/9/21 at 10:02 am to Gravitiger
quote:No one has claimed all race relations are simple. Just CRT.
Race relations in the US are complicated. CRT is just one perspective on that.
But maybe I’ve been presumptive. Perhaps you have a difficult time understanding CRT. But that says more about your capacity than it says about CRT.
This post was edited on 5/9/21 at 10:03 am
Posted on 5/9/21 at 10:04 am to HempHead
quote:First, please, tell me why you expect me to support an argument I never made.
Please, tell me about the extraordinary labor market for people with advanced degrees in the social science
Posted on 5/9/21 at 10:05 am to Gravitiger
quote:
First, please, tell me why you expect me to support an argument I never made.
I said that either tokenism or networking was the mostly only way to gain employment in an academic field that does not add productive value, and you disagreed. Maybe there was something lost in translation.
This post was edited on 5/9/21 at 10:08 am
Posted on 5/9/21 at 10:06 am to Taxing Authority
quote:Several people in this very thread have claimed that (or at least challenged that they are complicated). Not CRT people, either.
No one has claimed all race relations are simple. Just CRT.
Posted on 5/9/21 at 10:06 am to Gravitiger
quote:
Classic Roger, with yet another logical emoji gotcha.
says the guy throwing a hissy fit like a schoolgirl refusing to even enter the debate by explaining his definition of CRT. Face it Gravi, you’re not only wrong, you’re a pussy at the same time
Posted on 5/9/21 at 10:07 am to Klark Kent
How am I throwing a hissy fit? By responding with logical questions and without name calling?
Posted on 5/9/21 at 10:09 am to Gravitiger
“NEOCON!!!”
“I am logical and above name calling”
-you
“I am logical and above name calling”
-you
Posted on 5/9/21 at 10:09 am to Gravitiger
Because you won’t expand on your original point and out some context behind your statement. Stop being a bitch, explain CRT to us.
Posted on 5/9/21 at 10:10 am to Gravitiger
I'm not sure anyone has asked - are you a CRT advocate, or just being pedantic about aspects of it in response to another poster? If you are an advocate, what parts of CRT do you believe have a salient perspective on American race relations?
Posted on 5/9/21 at 10:10 am to HempHead
quote:No, you suggested I said there is an "extraordinary market for people with advanced social science degrees." Again, something I never said.
I said that either tokenism or networking was the mostly only way to gain employment in an academic field that does not add productive value, and you disagreed. Maybe there was something lost in translation.
This post was edited on 5/9/21 at 10:11 am
Posted on 5/9/21 at 10:10 am to Gravitiger
quote:
No, you said there is an "extraordinary market for people with social science degrees." Again, something I never said.
Baw, I made that statement and then you said "except not".
Posted on 5/9/21 at 10:12 am to HempHead
Then you kept up about token bullshite.
Posted on 5/9/21 at 10:13 am to Gravitiger
That's because I tend to think that most people who have a decent job in social sciences have their gig because they are well connected or are used as a token. It's difficult to find employment otherwise. Not entirely sure what the rub is here.
Posted on 5/9/21 at 10:15 am to HempHead
quote:This. It mostly just pisses me off that it's being used by right wing dorks who have never actually read any CRT book or article. Including Centinel.
just being pedantic about aspects of it in response to another poster?
That was literally my original point. It's become a goofy buzzword by people who have never tried understand it. But if you make that point, you're immediately labeled a libtard.
This post was edited on 5/9/21 at 10:18 am
Posted on 5/9/21 at 10:15 am to HempHead
quote:
If you are an advocate, what parts of CRT do you believe have a salient perspective on American race relations?
I feel like that’s the wrong question to ask. It should be how social structures and hierarchies through the prism of race were defined in the first place and how that specifically impacted how people of different races viewed one another.
Posted on 5/9/21 at 10:16 am to c on z
That is literally the question. 
Popular
Back to top


1







