- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Derek Chauvin trial - GUILTY ON ALL CHARGES. Update: His sentencing is today
Posted on 3/23/21 at 11:44 am to GEAUXmedic
Posted on 3/23/21 at 11:44 am to GEAUXmedic
LINK
quote:
Juror #2: The first person to be seated for the trial is a white man in his 20s. He works as a chemist and claims he hasn’t seen the viral bystander video of Floyd’s in-custody death. He said he supports Black Lives Matter as a movement and believes that “every life should matter equally.”
Juror #9: The first woman to join the panel is in her 20s and was described as multiracial. She is related to a Minnesota police officer and said she was “super excited” to be called for jury duty. She wrote on her jury questionnaire that she has a “somewhat negative” view of Chauvin but told the court she can put those feelings aside and be impartial.
Juror #19: The third juror is a white man in his 30s who works as a financial auditor. He said he has a “somewhat negative” view of Chauvin but will keep an open mind during trial.
Juror #27: The first Black man to join the panel is an immigrant who’s in his 30s and works in IT management. He told the court last week that Black lives are “marginalized” and that he does not support defunding the police, noting that officers in his community make him feel safe.
Juror #44: The second woman to be seated is white and in her 50s. She works for a nonprofit organization and said she believes systemic racism is a problem in the U.S. criminal justice system and that people are treated differently depending on their race.
quote:
Juror #52: Described by the court as a Black man in his 30s, this juror works in banking and coaches youth sports. He said he has a “neutral” view of Chauvin and supports Black Lives Matter. He also noted that he has personally witnessed Minneapolis police use excessive force and described the trial as the “most important case” in his lifetime.
Juror #55: A white woman in her 50s, she is a single parent, works in health care and rides a motorcycle. She told the court during questioning that she trusts the police and believes “all lives matter.”
Juror #79: The third Black man on the panel is an immigrant who’s in his 40s and works as a manager. He said on his jury questionnaire that he has a neutral opinion of Chauvin and a “somewhat favorable” view of Floyd. He also said he “strongly disagrees” with efforts to defund the police.
Juror #85: A multiracial woman in her 40s, this jury is a wife and a mother who works as a management consultant. She told the court she has a neutral opinion of both Black Lives Matter and Blue Lives Matter and does not know whether Chauvin caused Floyd’s death.
Juror #89: Described as a white woman in her 50s, this juror works as a registered nurse and has treated patients with severe COVID-19 symptoms. She said she believes discrimination against minorities is worse than portrayed by the media and disagrees with defunding the police.
Juror #91: The oldest member of the panel is a retired grandmother who’s Black and in her 60s, according to the court. She said she knows a Minneapolis police officer but believes she can be impartial. She also said she has a favorable opinion of Black Lives Matter and a neutral view of Chauvin.
Juror #92: A white woman in her 40s, this juror works in the insurance industry and has a degree in communications. She has a “very favorable” view of Blue Lives Matter and said calls to defund police departments “terrify” her. She also said she believes minorities face discrimination in the criminal justice system and has friends who have been treated differently because of their race.
Juror #96: The eighth woman added to the jury is white and in her 50s. She said she is a dog lover who hopes to get more involved in issues related to homelessness and affordable housing. She works for a Minneapolis business that was damaged during the clashes with police in the aftermath of Floyd’s death last year but said she could remain impartial.
Juror #118: A social worker in her 20s became the sixth white woman seated on the panel. The newly married juror indicated in her written questionnaire that she strongly disagrees with defunding the police and has neutral views of both Black Lives Matter and Blue Lives Matter.
Juror #131: The backup alternate added to the jury Tuesday is a married man who works as an accountant. He said he strongly disagrees with defunding the police and believes the message from the Black Lives Matter movement “gets lost” when protests turn into riots and looting. His race and approximate age were not immediately known.
Posted on 3/23/21 at 11:45 am to GEAUXmedic
quote:
Juror #44: The second woman to be seated is white and in her 50s. She works for a nonprofit organization and said she believes systemic racism is a problem in the U.S. criminal justice system and that people are treated differently depending on their race
That’s a guilty vote for sure .
Posted on 3/23/21 at 11:51 am to Lawyered
Too bad 131 is an alternate that will be excused Monday
Posted on 3/23/21 at 11:53 am to GEAUXmedic
quote:
@OmarJimenez
The jurors who will decide the fate of Derek Chauvin have now officially been picked, here's how the final jury breaks down:
-6 white women, 20's/40's/50's
-3 black men, 30's/40's
-2 white men, 20's/30's
-2 mixed raced women, 20's/40's
-1 black woman, 60's
Posted on 3/23/21 at 11:55 am to GEAUXmedic
seems about as close to a "good" jury for Chauvin as he can get in Minny
at least 2 jurors with relatives/acquaintances in MPD and one person whose workplace took damage during the riots
ETA: I assume the woman whose workplace took damage is an alternate
still though... lots of anti-defund the police views in there
at least 2 jurors with relatives/acquaintances in MPD and one person whose workplace took damage during the riots
ETA: I assume the woman whose workplace took damage is an alternate
still though... lots of anti-defund the police views in there
This post was edited on 3/23/21 at 11:58 am
Posted on 3/23/21 at 12:08 pm to GEAUXmedic
I don’t know how the defense team didn’t strike half of those jurors. I guess that’s why I’m not an attorney. 
Posted on 3/23/21 at 12:10 pm to TigersSEC2010
quote:
I don’t know how the defense team didn’t strike half of those jurors. I guess that’s why I’m not an attorney.
I guess the appropriate response question is 'how many strikes did the defense have left when the final juror was seated?'
Posted on 3/23/21 at 12:12 pm to rt3
They were pushing pretty hard for the Defense to waste strikes.
Posted on 3/23/21 at 12:45 pm to rt3
quote:
I guess the appropriate response question is 'how many strikes did the defense have left when the final juror was seated?'
The defense used 14 or their 18 and the prosecution used 8 of their 10
Posted on 3/23/21 at 1:54 pm to IT_Dawg
that's crazy, i definitely would've used more.
Posted on 3/23/21 at 1:57 pm to GEAUXmedic
Age breakdown:
#2 white M; 20s
#9 multi-race W; 20s
#19 white M; 30s
#27 Black M; 30s
#44 white W; 50s
#52 Black M; 30s
#55 white W; 50s
#79 Black M; 40s
#85 multi-race W; 40s
#89 white W; 50s
#91 Black W; 60s
#92 white W; 40s
#96 white W; 50s
#118: white W; 20s
#131: white M; 20s
#2 white M; 20s
#9 multi-race W; 20s
#19 white M; 30s
#27 Black M; 30s
#44 white W; 50s
#52 Black M; 30s
#55 white W; 50s
#79 Black M; 40s
#85 multi-race W; 40s
#89 white W; 50s
#91 Black W; 60s
#92 white W; 40s
#96 white W; 50s
#118: white W; 20s
#131: white M; 20s
Posted on 3/23/21 at 1:57 pm to IT_Dawg
quote:
The defense used 14 or their 18 and the prosecution used 8 of their 10
well that's just like taking timeouts into the postgame locker room following a close game
Posted on 3/23/21 at 2:18 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
or a terrible tragedy.
Posted on 3/23/21 at 2:25 pm to rt3
quote:
well that's just like taking timeouts into the postgame locker room following a close game
Not if you don't need the time outs or taking the extra time outs would have worked as a disadvantage in a close game. They just needed 12 (15) impartial people. They don't know whos coming in next that might be better or worse
Posted on 3/23/21 at 2:25 pm to TigersSEC2010
quote:
don’t know how the defense team didn’t strike half of those jurors. I guess that’s why I’m not an attorney.
I watched all of them and they didn’t seem as biased as portrayed in that article. I think it highlights too few of what they actually portrayed to the attorneys. I thought everyone that got picked seemed like they could be fair.
Posted on 3/23/21 at 2:27 pm to carguymatt
quote:
They don't know whos coming in next that might be better or worse
Actually they do. They have info packets on everyone so they can see preliminarily who may be a strike or pass ahead of time.
Popular
Back to top



6


