- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: BR Coca Cola Sign Covered
Posted on 5/26/14 at 4:27 pm to TigerBait2008
Posted on 5/26/14 at 4:27 pm to TigerBait2008
quote:
Holy crap, I've read some really dumb stuff on here but you take the idiot cake..
You can have your opinion but you can't have your own facts.
Posted on 5/26/14 at 4:43 pm to The Third Leg
Oh so he owns the sign? Is that what you're saying?
Posted on 5/26/14 at 4:52 pm to The Third Leg
I think the fact of the matter is this, he owns the building the sign is attached to. If I buy a house with a billboard built on the property, I can make them remove it from my property. If someone puts up something on my property and doesn't have my permission (art work, graffiti, an ad) I can cover it up and make the person pay to have it removed. Or I can cover it up and ask the owner to pay me for right to use my property. Doesn't matter if he owns the sign or not, he has the right to tell them that they can't display the sign there without paying him for the use of his property.
Posted on 5/26/14 at 5:34 pm to Dac311
Well you're wrong.
quote:
Let me fill you in. In 2002, the then-storm-damaged sign was donated by Pete and Joy Richoux to the Arts Council of Greater Baton Rouge. The Downtown Development District brokered the deal, which included an agreement with both Coca-Cola and Entergy. The former agreed to handle and pay for all maintenance of the sign, while the latter vowed to provide free power to light it, so long as the sign was donated to the Arts Council.
That’s why Coca-Cola just dropped $20,000 on maintenance, and why they’ve spent in the neighborhood of $150,000 over the past 30 years maintaining a sign they (and you) don’t own.
Yet in a letter from your attorney, you bitched about needing money for maintenance of the sign. Mutherfricker, they just spent $20,000 fixing the goddam thing!
This post was edited on 5/26/14 at 5:38 pm
Posted on 5/26/14 at 5:38 pm to monsterballads
Then he legally can't frick with it. If it weren't his I think we'd have heard about him getting arrested for tampering with others' property or maybe you would provide a link. Something, anything. It sounds like you're just talking out of your arse. Maybe you have reasons for being aloof about your "knowledge" but seriously, what do you expect us to think?
Posted on 5/26/14 at 5:43 pm to junkfunky
They knocked 15k off the building when the owner bought it when they told him the sign belonged to the arts council.
It doesn't belong to him and I expect the arts council to take down the sign and place it elsewhere because this building owner is a dick.
It doesn't belong to him and I expect the arts council to take down the sign and place it elsewhere because this building owner is a dick.
This post was edited on 5/26/14 at 5:45 pm
Posted on 5/26/14 at 5:52 pm to Roscoe
My dad always said, "If you share office space with someone, make sure you own the roof."
Posted on 5/26/14 at 6:09 pm to Geauxtiga
He owns the roof, just not the sign.
Posted on 5/27/14 at 1:42 pm to monsterballads
Posted on 5/27/14 at 1:49 pm to Motorboat
OH THANK GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
also didn't realize Delgado was an owner of Huey's.....frick that place then
also didn't realize Delgado was an owner of Huey's.....frick that place then
Posted on 5/27/14 at 1:52 pm to Motorboat
quote:
The tarp is off. rest easy baws
I walked by it just after noon after eating downtown. It was still covered up then.
Posted on 5/27/14 at 1:54 pm to Festus
quote:
I walked by it just after noon after eating downtown. It was still covered up then.
Published May 27, 2014 at 1:22 pm
Well you can see it tomorrow.
Posted on 5/27/14 at 1:55 pm to BilJ
quote:
also didn't realize Delgado was an owner of Huey's.....frick that place then
I will never go back to that place.
Posted on 5/27/14 at 1:55 pm to BilJ
If the owner's attorney truly didn't know that the tarp was taken off, I doubt the dispute has been resolved.
Posted on 5/27/14 at 1:56 pm to BilJ
is it weird i cant even picture this sign in my head?
Posted on 5/27/14 at 1:56 pm to Motorboat
I'm not eating downtown tomorrow.
That publication printed a got dang lie, though, I'll tell you that much.
That publication printed a got dang lie, though, I'll tell you that much.
Posted on 5/27/14 at 1:56 pm to BilJ
and yeah a lot of people i know wanted hueys to suck. i've only been twice but i had a good time both times.
Popular
Back to top


2




