- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: BR Coca Cola Sign Covered
Posted on 5/26/14 at 2:14 pm to Sprocket46
Posted on 5/26/14 at 2:14 pm to Sprocket46
Obvious is obvious.
Gordon Gecko? Lol.
Gordon Gecko? Lol.
1
Posted on 5/26/14 at 2:16 pm to The Third Leg
Some people on this site make me scared for my children lol
Posted on 5/26/14 at 2:18 pm to Sprocket46
I think many of them are probably amateur satirists too.
Posted on 5/26/14 at 2:19 pm to Sprocket46
Lol
Question: What kind of fricktard bitches about needing money to maintain property he neither owns nor maintains, and at the same time, bitches that someone else is maintaining that property without first getting his permission to do so?
Answer: Look in the fricking mirror.
Question: What kind of fricktard bitches about needing money to maintain property he neither owns nor maintains, and at the same time, bitches that someone else is maintaining that property without first getting his permission to do so?
Answer: Look in the fricking mirror.
Posted on 5/26/14 at 2:32 pm to The Third Leg
From reading this thread, it kinda reminds of these landmarks in NOLA that were turned into apartments
Posted on 5/26/14 at 2:32 pm to Signal Soldier
What's the history on the Mike Crouch guy anyway?
Someone on the OT has to know
Someone on the OT has to know
Posted on 5/26/14 at 2:34 pm to Sprocket46
quote:
No, its not serious. Use your heads people.
How is the article not serious? There's no satire to it. They absolutely despise the building owner for what he's doing.
Posted on 5/26/14 at 2:36 pm to monsterballads
Perhaps people who are upset should buy the building and sign themselves then?
Posted on 5/26/14 at 2:37 pm to wizziko
It happens. I'm not saying they can't desire the coke sign, I'm saying the sign's cultural significance has been wildly exaggerated. Maintaining architectural standards is one thing, treasuring a sign is another.
Posted on 5/26/14 at 2:39 pm to monsterballads
They forgot to break character then.
Posted on 5/26/14 at 2:42 pm to The Third Leg
I think that I heard that elsewhere in downtown some people bought a building a wanted to paint it.
Because it had some sort of historical significance they had to go through some hoops. Bottom line, they couldn't paint their own building because it had this huge "Antiques" painted across the front, which was 'historical.'
They had to put up some metal contraption to try to hide it. Might not be the story but that's what I heard.
People gonna regulate other people stuff if they can.
Because it had some sort of historical significance they had to go through some hoops. Bottom line, they couldn't paint their own building because it had this huge "Antiques" painted across the front, which was 'historical.'
They had to put up some metal contraption to try to hide it. Might not be the story but that's what I heard.
People gonna regulate other people stuff if they can.
This post was edited on 5/26/14 at 2:45 pm
Posted on 5/26/14 at 2:45 pm to Traffic Circle
quote:
Perhaps people who are upset should buy the building and sign themselves then?
The arts council owns it. They already have plans of taking the sign down and putting it somewhere else.
This post was edited on 5/26/14 at 2:51 pm
Posted on 5/26/14 at 2:46 pm to The Third Leg
quote:
They forgot to break character then.
You realize that RS doesn't always post satire right?
Sometimes they just post stuff like this condemning shite in BR
Posted on 5/26/14 at 2:47 pm to monsterballads
quote:
The city council owns it. They already have plans of taking the sign down and putting it somewhere else.
The story I read said that the "Arts Council" claims ownership but the Act of Donation was in dispute.
Maybe I read the wrong article?
Posted on 5/26/14 at 2:48 pm to Traffic Circle
Again, architectural and period mandates for historical preservation are common. They usually trace to the formation of the town at its epicenter.
I'm guessing that few cities have branded 50 year old corporate signs as Cultural landmarks. For Christ sake, lost in all of this is that it's sitting stop a fricking dumpy arse building leased to a fast food place.
I'm guessing that few cities have branded 50 year old corporate signs as Cultural landmarks. For Christ sake, lost in all of this is that it's sitting stop a fricking dumpy arse building leased to a fast food place.
Posted on 5/26/14 at 2:50 pm to Traffic Circle
Arts council. Not the city council. You are correct.
Bottom line is it's not owned by the building owner.
Bottom line is it's not owned by the building owner.
Posted on 5/26/14 at 2:50 pm to Roscoe
One love
Posted on 5/26/14 at 2:51 pm to monsterballads
Dude, it is satirically written. It might not be satire in his mind, but it is most certainly, definitely, satirically written.
And if it is true, he's lost what a landmark is. Or he's 20.
And if it is true, he's lost what a landmark is. Or he's 20.
Posted on 5/26/14 at 2:52 pm to Roscoe
What is Cane's?
Posted on 5/26/14 at 2:58 pm to CaptainBrannigan
Fast food chicken
Page 7 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News