- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 5/27/14 at 2:00 pm to Motorboat
If I worked downtown I would. Maybe Nokamoto will do something on it this afternoon.
Posted on 5/27/14 at 2:02 pm to Roscoe
Who gives a frick about the Coca Cola sign?
Posted on 5/27/14 at 2:02 pm to bbap
I know Delgado certainly doesn't have controlling share. Of the three owners, 1 has 51% and I believe the other two share the rest evenly.
I've had a good time the few times I've made it to Hueys though I don't go very often.
I've had a good time the few times I've made it to Hueys though I don't go very often.
Posted on 5/27/14 at 2:02 pm to yellowfin
quote:This.
It's a shame coke thinks they should get free advertising
Posted on 5/27/14 at 2:04 pm to Scruffy
quote:I'm sure it's been addressed in the 10 pages, but I'll ask the question anyway. If he doesn't own it, then why does he have to pay for its upkeep?
Also, if this individual acknowledged that he wouldn't own the sign when he purchased the property and even used that to get the building for $15k less, would that be sufficient in court to affect the ownership of the sign?
Posted on 5/27/14 at 2:05 pm to boom roasted
I agree that free advertising isn't something one should expect, but if they really dropped the price of the building 15,000 because they made an agreement that the sign was not part of the sale, the building owner has no right to cover it IMO.
From what I understand, he doesn't. I mean Coke came in and did 20k in reno's a few months ago so they are obviously doing upkeep and I think in the article it said something about someone else paying for electrical.
quote:
If he doesn't own it, then why does he have to pay for its upkeep?
From what I understand, he doesn't. I mean Coke came in and did 20k in reno's a few months ago so they are obviously doing upkeep and I think in the article it said something about someone else paying for electrical.
This post was edited on 5/27/14 at 2:06 pm
Posted on 5/27/14 at 2:06 pm to SouthOfSouth
Posted on 5/27/14 at 2:08 pm to SouthOfSouth
I am absolutely anti-lawsuit but there are certain things, property disputes for example, that are tailor made to be argued and decided in a court of law. This seems to fit the bill.
What I truly don't understand is why a certain councilman, of whom we have spoken often in this thread (who himself happens to be an officer of the court), thought it wise to jump in and declare that he was going to take statutory action to resolve this dispute. That ticked me off.
As far as the sign and who owns what, they can either reach a mutually acceptable business arrangement or go to court and let a Judge decide.
What I truly don't understand is why a certain councilman, of whom we have spoken often in this thread (who himself happens to be an officer of the court), thought it wise to jump in and declare that he was going to take statutory action to resolve this dispute. That ticked me off.
As far as the sign and who owns what, they can either reach a mutually acceptable business arrangement or go to court and let a Judge decide.
Posted on 5/27/14 at 2:09 pm to bbap
I like it fine too, I just thought the owner was a former GM for the walk ons/happys guys
Posted on 5/27/14 at 2:10 pm to BilJ
quote:
I just thought the owner was a former GM for the walk ons/happys guys
That is one of the three.
Also at Uncle Earls for a while.
This post was edited on 5/27/14 at 2:11 pm
Posted on 5/27/14 at 2:13 pm to SouthOfSouth
The article says something about the building owner being responsible for property and liability insurance.
Posted on 5/27/14 at 2:25 pm to jbgleason
quote:
What I truly don't understand is why a certain councilman, of whom we have spoken often in this thread (who himself happens to be an officer of the court), thought it wise to jump in and declare that he was going to take statutory action to resolve this dispute. That ticked me off.
That's because the gentlemen you're referring to, John Delgado is the biggest attention whore in the world. And he works tirelessly to make sure that everyone who hears his name know damn well he's a shithead.
Posted on 5/27/14 at 2:29 pm to nc14
quote:
American, southern and the most recognized trademark in the world. BR is home to one of the largest CC manufacturing facilities in the US (highlighted in an epdisode of "How It's Made". Coca-Cola has been in business for over 100 years and continues to employee hundreds of thousands of people thus supporting local, state and national economy while offering "one of life's simple pleasures" - affordably. Enjoy
We(Baton Rougeons) also have helped preserve Esso Signs and Keans signs in the Downtown / Mid City area.
People getting crazy with legality and ownership are tossing common sense and got damned common courtesy out the the window. That sign is important to the 3rd Street area as it was one of few reminders of 3rds glory days, and it's recent refurbishing is a testament to our rebirth since the oil crash.
We are BR. And that sign needs to shine. frick that dude.
Posted on 5/27/14 at 2:32 pm to boom roasted
quote:
Who gives a frick about the Coca Cola sign?
The guy who wrote the Red Shtick piece gave lots of fricks (and quite a few other choice words) with all the drama and butthurt angst of a jilted 14yr old.
This post was edited on 5/27/14 at 2:33 pm
Posted on 5/27/14 at 2:35 pm to Bard
quote:
The guy who wrote the Red Shtick piece gave lots of fricks (and quite a few other choice words) with all the drama and butthurt angst of a jilted 14yr old
I couldn't stop laughing reading that. He said frick more than me.
Posted on 5/27/14 at 2:39 pm to Bard
boy that dude was super upset. didnt read the whole thing but i certainly felt the dudes anger coming through the screen.
Posted on 5/27/14 at 2:46 pm to boom roasted
quote:
then why does he have to pay for its upkeep?
he doesn't
Posted on 5/27/14 at 2:50 pm to bbap
quote:
boy that dude was super upset. didnt read the whole thing but i certainly felt the dudes anger coming through the screen.
he's the editor of RS too.
honestly, the whole thing is ridiculous. he waited to cover the sign up the day before the grand opening of raising canes because he felt like since the sign has been on his roof all these years, he owns it. what a delusional a-hole
Posted on 5/27/14 at 3:02 pm to monsterballads
Then what was the atty talking about re property and liability insurance?
Page 10 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News