- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 5/18/14 at 4:57 pm to ctiger69
Haha, body fat is bound to bring up some awesome OT replies. Half the board is going to be below the median body fat of NBA rookies who were tested last week.
Posted on 5/18/14 at 5:12 pm to Keys Open Doors
True. After thinking about it I would say a combination of: body fat, ht/wt, and physical endurance is a better measurement of total fitness.
The body fat measurement alone would eliminate most people from good total fitness.
The body fat measurement alone would eliminate most people from good total fitness.
This post was edited on 5/18/14 at 5:13 pm
Posted on 5/18/14 at 5:18 pm to ctiger69
I think if you went with under 15 percent body fat (or maybe even 18), you would still keep most people qualified.
I was just saying that you would have a bunch of people claiming to be 7-8 percent in a thread here
I was just saying that you would have a bunch of people claiming to be 7-8 percent in a thread here
Posted on 5/18/14 at 5:28 pm to weagle99
Holy frick americans are fat
Eta: so are a bunch of you
Eta: so are a bunch of you
This post was edited on 5/18/14 at 5:30 pm
Posted on 5/18/14 at 5:29 pm to Keys Open Doors
7 months ago, my answer would have been very different. My waist was almost 37 inches. 
Posted on 5/18/14 at 5:32 pm to glassman
I'm the same as Glassman.
Posted on 5/18/14 at 5:41 pm to weagle99
quote:
Height (inches): 69.3
Weight (pounds): 195.5
Waist circumference (inches): 39.7
I'm above height, above weight, below waist. How does that even work?
Posted on 5/18/14 at 6:52 pm to weagle99
Damn it I'm average
But we're not talking pecker size
But we're not talking pecker size
Posted on 5/18/14 at 6:55 pm to lsufan9193969700
5-2
363 lbs
58 inch waist
363 lbs
58 inch waist
Posted on 5/18/14 at 6:57 pm to The Calvin
72, 220. 38 checking in.
Posted on 5/18/14 at 7:18 pm to southernelite
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/21/21 at 8:36 am
Posted on 5/18/14 at 7:22 pm to Bestbank Tiger
5'6
150
29
150
29
Posted on 5/18/14 at 7:29 pm to weagle99
Wife is 5'10 and 120.
Posted on 5/18/14 at 7:30 pm to weagle99
Probably posted but...
and
does not compute.
quote:
Weight (pounds): 195.5
and
quote:
Waist circumference (inches): 39.7
does not compute.
Posted on 5/18/14 at 7:31 pm to weagle99
ME
6'0
185
34
Wife
5'4
105
4, whatever that means
6'0
185
34
Wife
5'4
105
4, whatever that means
Posted on 5/18/14 at 7:33 pm to RogerTheShrubber
5'5" 298.
Ha! in your face!
Ha! in your face!
Posted on 5/18/14 at 7:36 pm to LSU alum wannabe
People are still substituting pant size for waist size. 39.7 inch waist probably equals 36/37 pant size.
My waist is 37/38 but my pants are 34/35 depending on brand.
75
203
38
My waist is 37/38 but my pants are 34/35 depending on brand.
75
203
38
Posted on 5/18/14 at 7:38 pm to TheIndulger
72.5" (yes that .5" counts )
177#
33/34 pants but my waste is slightly smaller than my hips
) 177#
33/34 pants but my waste is slightly smaller than my hips
Posted on 5/18/14 at 7:39 pm to GRTiger
quote:
People are still substituting pant size for waist size. 39.7 inch waist probably equals 36/37 pant size.
Or that we workout and have wider hips than our waist?
Page 6 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News