Started By
Message

re: Australia plans to ban children from using social media, possibly a 16 yr/old minimum age

Posted on 9/9/24 at 9:59 pm to
Posted by RGeeDub
Member since Jul 2023
18 posts
Posted on 9/9/24 at 9:59 pm to
I would be thrilled with that. Any extra time we can buy for brain development before exposing them to social medias pretentious poison would be a win.
Posted by TROLA
BATON ROUGE
Member since Apr 2004
13032 posts
Posted on 9/9/24 at 10:08 pm to
quote:

You do know they are talking about some sort of age verification in order to create an account right?


You think you’re going to keep kids who’ve grown up with the tech to not bypass security measures and when they do….. what’s the punishment because no punishment equals nullification from the start.. how much is this going to cost them? Who sets the regulations? Can they be changed? By whom and what mechanism?

Posted by Gee Grenouille
Bogalusa
Member since Jul 2018
5698 posts
Posted on 9/9/24 at 11:07 pm to
quote:

How are they going to enforce it?


In Australia? Probably just put people in the old Covid camps.
Posted by LemmyLives
Texas
Member since Mar 2019
7348 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 12:28 am to
You are way too sheltered. My sixth grade kid was trying to download vpns to get around school WiFi restrictions at 11.

Age verification lol. Do most 13 year olds have state IDs or passports? You want to send that info to Facebook or Snapchat?

It’s not just poor kids that have this problem, like you seem to think. You want to cleanse the unwashed masses from their vice, but you aren’t getting that this is any strata of society, and again, enabled by parents.
Posted by mudshuvl05
Member since Nov 2023
1176 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 1:02 am to
Now's when all the, "small government conservatives" of the board get to show they're just as hypocritical as a prog when it comes to rules for thee, not for me.

Muh, "There should be a law!"

Imagine, after seeing the dystopian hellscape they put their citizens through during covid, and saying, "yep, checks out."

People are so gullible and stupid, and that comes from someone who thinks social media is brain rot for humanity, yet a driving force for change and breaking down the propaganda machine. If you agree with this and call yourself anything except a staunch progressive, you're a walking around jackass and I hope you catch a felony so you can't vote. Holy shite this place is full of retards.
Posted by LsuNav
Sacramento
Member since Mar 2008
1460 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 1:52 am to
Don’t all the video game consoles have some kind of social media attached the them? They may have to keep kids from using an Xbox. That is also a good thing. Those little people have better reflexes than I do.
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
123097 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 4:58 am to
Good
Posted by Easye921
Mobile
Member since Jan 2013
2434 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 5:17 am to
quote:

Now's when all the, "small government conservatives" of the board get to show they're just as hypocritical as a prog when it comes to rules for thee, not for me.

Muh, "There should be a law!"

Imagine, after seeing the dystopian hellscape they put their citizens through during covid, and saying, "yep, checks out."

People are so gullible and stupid, and that comes from someone who thinks social media is brain rot for humanity, yet a driving force for change and breaking down the propaganda machine. If you agree with this and call yourself anything except a staunch progressive, you're a walking around jackass and I hope you catch a felony so you can't vote. Holy shite this place is full of retards.


You frickin nailed it on the head. Reading the comments and it's fricking baffling how many are in favor of this.
Posted by Twenty 49
Shreveport
Member since Jun 2014
19198 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 5:23 am to
quote:

Plus you are not subject to the First and Second Amendment until you’re 18.


Not correct.

Children have First Amendment rights to access information. The issue comes up often in school library book challenges and cases where kids are punished by public school officials for social media posts.

The Supreme Court held in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969) that students do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.” “In our system, students may not be regarded as closed-circuit recipients of only that which the State chooses to communicate.”

There are limits, but chilluns under 18 have First Amendment rights.
Posted by ole man
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2007
12715 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 5:30 am to
They haven't figured that out yet, That's who the left is, just pass shite and figure it out later
Posted by Fat and Happy
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2013
17550 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 5:33 am to
There will be no way to actually stop this. There is always a way around internet blockages.

Jumping a firewall is pretty easy by itself much less that ID check stuff that’s simple to get around too
Posted by Psych23
Member since Aug 2024
416 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 5:36 am to
quote:

Agree, but it shouldn't be on the government to enforce it. Parents should enforce it.


Why not? Government enforces the smoking and drinking age. Should they not enforce those age restrictions as well?
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
73258 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 5:36 am to
quote:

Agree, but it shouldn't be on the government to enforce it. Parents should enforce it.
So, should the other things only be parental enforcement?

Cigarettes? Alcohol? Drugs? Gambling?

What makes social media special?
Posted by Psych23
Member since Aug 2024
416 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 5:38 am to
quote:

There will be no way to actually stop this. There is always a way around internet blockages


Just outlaw the entire internet for everyone as far as I'm concerned.
Posted by olddawg26
Member since Jan 2013
24873 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 6:13 am to
Completely agree, and the rest of the modern world should follow suit. Social media, as a whole for anyone under 18 has been a net negative. Not one good thing comes from children using it, and anything you can actually come up with can be done online without social media. It’s a poisonous cancerous and dangerous tool that’s being used to take advantage of kids.
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
26177 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 6:24 am to
Remember, you're on social medis right now.
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
83100 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 6:29 am to
quote:

I'm conflicted on this one.
don't be. Nothing Australia does right now is good
Posted by GeauxTigers0107
South Louisiana
Member since Oct 2009
9998 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 6:36 am to
quote:

I'm conflicted on this one. On one hand, social media is a problem, particularly for young people. On the other, frick more government regulations, this should be a parenting issue.


I think you nailed it on the head with this one. I the exact same way. There's got to be an answer somewhere in between the two extremes.
Posted by Vidic
Member since Jan 2010
9214 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 6:37 am to
quote:

We ban cigarettes and alcohol from kids, why not the most destructive addiction of them all?


While we’re at it, let’s ban sugar till you’re 18. Would help solve a lot of problems
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
29918 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 6:42 am to
quote:

Children have First Amendment rights to access information.



Were you able to walk up to a store and buy a dirty magazine as a kid? Maybe it was just me that couldn't
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram