Why not just tackle their receivers for two plays?

well a PI would stop the clock, right? Which would have put them in FG range and given them time to get the FG unit out.

Must be some problem with that

quote:

---

well a PI would stop the clock, right? Which would have put them in FG range and given them time to get the FG unit out.

---

Tackle both of them at the LoS is defensive holding.

Clock would of had not enough time for a FG at that point.

quote:

---

Actually, that makes sense. Holding penalty is only 10 yards. Tackle them at the LoS.

Puts them on the 49 with less than 6 seconds.


This is actually genius.

---

Yeah no shite. And who knows case might of freaked out and just held the ball and not know what to do.

let's be clear though, we were in position to simply end the game exactly how it was played. Williams makes that time 50 times in a row if given the opportunity.

But yea, your scenario makes perfect sense. But hard to think of on the spot, I guess.

Dont tackle but you could hug at the line of scrimiage which would burn probably 5 seconds while the play runs its self out. Especially if QB scrambles and gets sacked.

We had 10 seconds on the goal line earlier this year and someone did this to us, only had time left to kick a field goal.

quote:

---

You can however potentially end the game having every eligible receiver on the ground and Case not knowing what to do until there's like 3 seconds left lol.

---

we'd probably get roasted for dirty play, but who gives a frick.

i still can't believe that play happened. I can't get any work done today.

quote:

---

There is some kind of “egregious foul” rule that negates this

I don’t know the specifics but I remember people talking about this

---

90% sure there is no rule for this.

quote:

---

Someone did this to us going to halftime during a game last season.

---

Chip Kelly in SF.