- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
We need SF to beat GB this week. The farther GB slides the better
Posted on 11/18/19 at 9:37 am
Posted on 11/18/19 at 9:37 am
We will take care of SF. SF will likely lose to Seattle again. I want NO part of GB on the road in the playoffs
6
Posted on 11/18/19 at 9:39 am to TechDawg2007
I agree
Posted on 11/18/19 at 9:43 am to TechDawg2007
I am calling it now SF will not win their own division. They will end up being a wild card team and Seattle will win that Division.
Posted on 11/18/19 at 9:44 am to TechDawg2007
Hot take, but we're better suited to play in snow than GB is. Better run-blocking O-line. Better RB's who can also catch. More experienced possession receivers and TE's.
Kam would be deadly on a slick field and Taysom Hill would be an awesome weapon as well - Packers have nobody like them on their side.
Kam would be deadly on a slick field and Taysom Hill would be an awesome weapon as well - Packers have nobody like them on their side.
This post was edited on 11/18/19 at 9:54 am
Posted on 11/18/19 at 9:49 am to TechDawg2007
I agree with OP.
I disagree with Alejandro.
I disagree with Alejandro.
Posted on 11/18/19 at 9:50 am to Suntiger
What specifically do you disagree with?
Posted on 11/18/19 at 9:51 am to TechDawg2007
quote:
We will take care of SF. SF will likely lose to Seattle again. I want NO part of GB on the road in the playoffs
been saying this for 3 weeks now, with much push back, because people are stupid...
add the fact that we play SF, so we can help ourselves out there, whereas we don't play GB, and need help from other teams with them, it makes all the sense in the world to pull for SF this week...
Posted on 11/18/19 at 9:51 am to chRxis
We match up tremendously well with GB. We match up with GB much better than we match up with SF.
I think we're better than both, but SF's backs and TE's and WR's would give us a lot more trouble than GB's offense would.
I think we're better than both, but SF's backs and TE's and WR's would give us a lot more trouble than GB's offense would.
This post was edited on 11/18/19 at 9:52 am
Posted on 11/18/19 at 9:52 am to stelly1025
quote:
I am calling it now SF will not win their own division. They will end up being a wild card team and Seattle will win that Division.
I agree with this. Either way, if we can beat SF then we control the tiebreaker on that division for seeding. I don’t see LA overtaking either of these two teams
Posted on 11/18/19 at 9:53 am to SirWinston
quote:
Better RB's who can also catch. Better and more experienced possession receivers and TE's.
you haven't watched much of the Packers this year, i can tell...
Aaron Jones is a very good RB, they have a deeper receiving corps than we do, and 10 degrees outside is 10 degrees... we've NEVER done well in severe cold weather...
Posted on 11/18/19 at 9:55 am to chRxis
I have watched every Packers game. Their WR's are young and talented but they aren't possession WR's that you'd want in the snow.
Kam and Murray would be better suited in the snow than Jones. Our TE's would also be superior. Taysom would be an amazing X factor.
It's all moot bc we're going to get home field anyhow.
Kam and Murray would be better suited in the snow than Jones. Our TE's would also be superior. Taysom would be an amazing X factor.
It's all moot bc we're going to get home field anyhow.
This post was edited on 11/18/19 at 9:58 am
Posted on 11/18/19 at 10:04 am to SirWinston
Here's SF's 9 wins on the season and their current record
Buccaneers 3-7
Bengals 0-10 (already mathematically eliminated from playoffs)
Steelers 5-5
Browns 4-6
Rams 6-4
Redskins 1-9
Panthers 5-5
Cardinals (2x) 3-7-1
Their 1 loss was to the 8-2 Seahawks (at home)
so of SF's 9 wins...
1 vs. teams > .500 (6-4 Rams)
2 vs. teams = .500 (5-5 Panthers, 5-5 Steelers)
6 vs. teams < .500
ETA: I failed to make the point of my post
each of SF's next 3 opponents all have an 8-2 record currently (vs. GB, @ BAL, @ NO)
Buccaneers 3-7
Bengals 0-10 (already mathematically eliminated from playoffs)
Steelers 5-5
Browns 4-6
Rams 6-4
Redskins 1-9
Panthers 5-5
Cardinals (2x) 3-7-1
Their 1 loss was to the 8-2 Seahawks (at home)
so of SF's 9 wins...
1 vs. teams > .500 (6-4 Rams)
2 vs. teams = .500 (5-5 Panthers, 5-5 Steelers)
6 vs. teams < .500
ETA: I failed to make the point of my post
each of SF's next 3 opponents all have an 8-2 record currently (vs. GB, @ BAL, @ NO)
This post was edited on 11/18/19 at 10:05 am
Posted on 11/18/19 at 10:05 am to SirWinston
I am not afraid of the Packers team in the playoffs. I am afraid of the NFL propping up a historic franchise and a golden boy QB in the playoffs.
Posted on 11/18/19 at 10:07 am to rt3
quote:Could easily lose the next 3. However, we NEED SF to beat GB
s. GB, @ BAL, @ NO
Posted on 11/18/19 at 10:12 am to TechDawg2007
quote:
Could easily lose the next 3. However, we NEED SF to beat GB
the thing I think all Saints fans have to like is that the Saints will be coming off the "mini-bye" that is a week following a Thursday night game while SF is going to be in a tough Sunday noon game
Posted on 11/18/19 at 10:16 am to rt3
Not to mention they play GB sunday night before the Ravens
Posted on 11/18/19 at 10:24 am to SirWinston
quote:
Hot take, but we're better suited to play in snow than GB is. Better run-blocking O-line. Better RB's who can also catch. More experienced possession receivers and TE's.
It’s not even a hot take it’s the truth. We’re definitely the more physical team. Still don’t want to go to their house in the playoffs though.
Posted on 11/18/19 at 10:26 am to TechDawg2007
quote:quote:
GB, @ BAL, @ NO
Could easily lose the next 3. However, we NEED SF to beat GB
I think SF loses to Balt & NOLA; therefore, it would make sense that we should want them to beat GB. That would give both of them 3 loses, which makes HFA a little easier to obtain.
Posted on 11/18/19 at 10:30 am to Weekend Warrior79
It also should be noted that GB would have the tie breaker on us because 1 of their loses was to the Chargers, so they will have the better NFC record.
Posted on 11/18/19 at 10:40 am to Weekend Warrior79
quote:
It also should be noted that GB would have the tie breaker on us because 1 of their loses was to the Chargers, so they will have the better NFC record.
lets look at GB's remaining schedule... shall we
@ SF 9-1
@ NYG 2-8
vs. WASH 1-9
vs. CHI 4-6
@ MIN 8-3
@ DET 3-6-1
2 opps currently > .500
0 opps currently = .500
4 opps currently < .500
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News