- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jarvis Landry To The Saints?
Posted on 2/18/18 at 1:38 pm to Chalkywhite84
Posted on 2/18/18 at 1:38 pm to Chalkywhite84
except Wilson isn’t exclusively running 3 yard routes. Now you tell me what pass is hard to complete. A 3 yard pass or one that travels further in ththe air
1
Posted on 2/18/18 at 1:40 pm to Magazine St
How can u say landry and snead are carbon copies of each other when jarvis has done it in college and since his rookie year.
Not saying i would pay him 14 mil or anything close but its obvious he is better than willie snead.
And the reason he caught most of his passes by the line is because they have a deep threat that was bill lazor s offense those years ans he is a slot receiver. He runs after the catch way better than snead and he hasnt ever disappeared not for one single game
Guys a baller and gives it his all every game.
But give me paul richardson and ill be happy
Not saying i would pay him 14 mil or anything close but its obvious he is better than willie snead.
And the reason he caught most of his passes by the line is because they have a deep threat that was bill lazor s offense those years ans he is a slot receiver. He runs after the catch way better than snead and he hasnt ever disappeared not for one single game
Guys a baller and gives it his all every game.
But give me paul richardson and ill be happy
Posted on 2/18/18 at 1:43 pm to Lester Earl
Fleener and coleman are in an offense where they are running seams and are catching the ball 20 yards down the field.
Its a different offense man u dont see fleener and coleman running the same routes as jarvis
They are stretching the field where jarvis runs underneath crossing routes you even said it yourself he doesnt have the speed
Its a different offense man u dont see fleener and coleman running the same routes as jarvis
They are stretching the field where jarvis runs underneath crossing routes you even said it yourself he doesnt have the speed
Posted on 2/19/18 at 8:27 am to Chalkywhite84
quote:
How can u say landry and snead are carbon copies of each other when jarvis has done it in college and since his rookie year.
who had the better rookie year?
Player A:
69 Rec
102 tar
984 yards
14.3 ypc
3 TD
Player B:
84 rec
111 tar
758 yards
9.0 ypc
5 TD
Posted on 2/19/18 at 8:52 am to SlowFlowPro
Yall are so fricking disingenuous with this whole Snead > Landry bullshite 
Posted on 2/19/18 at 9:24 am to 50_Tiger
quote:If you add cost for each, I would take Snead.
Yall are so fricking disingenuous with this whole Snead > Landry bullshitee
Posted on 2/19/18 at 9:27 am to NOSHAU
quote:
If you add cost for each, I would take Snead.
One might not even get a tender, the other might fetch over 10 million a year.
I guess the rest of the league and just on pins and needles waiting for good ole Snead to be released!!!
Posted on 2/19/18 at 9:27 am to 50_Tiger
Snead might not be > Landry
But you guys are nuts to think a 14 million dollar slot receiver is a good idea.
Lets just look at the top 6 receiving options last year:
Brees 536 passes
Thomas: 149 targets
Kamara: 100 targets
Ginn: 70 targets
Ingram: 71 targets
Coleman: 38 targets
Fleener: 30 targets
Total: 457 passes (I'll leave the other 80 out of it, its bound to happen)
Assuming that Landry comes in, how does this go?
Thomas: 130 targets
Landry: 100 targets
Kamara: 80 targets
Ginn: 60 targets
Ingram: 40 targets
Coleman: 20 targets
Fleener: 20 targets
Total: 450 targets
Is a player who accumulates 70 receptions, 100 targets worth 14mil? Nope.
But you guys are nuts to think a 14 million dollar slot receiver is a good idea.
Lets just look at the top 6 receiving options last year:
Brees 536 passes
Thomas: 149 targets
Kamara: 100 targets
Ginn: 70 targets
Ingram: 71 targets
Coleman: 38 targets
Fleener: 30 targets
Total: 457 passes (I'll leave the other 80 out of it, its bound to happen)
Assuming that Landry comes in, how does this go?
Thomas: 130 targets
Landry: 100 targets
Kamara: 80 targets
Ginn: 60 targets
Ingram: 40 targets
Coleman: 20 targets
Fleener: 20 targets
Total: 450 targets
Is a player who accumulates 70 receptions, 100 targets worth 14mil? Nope.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 9:28 am to htran90
Not advocating spending 14 million on him.
10 million im down for though
10 million im down for though
Posted on 2/19/18 at 9:29 am to 50_Tiger
quote:
Yall are so fricking disingenuous with this whole Snead > Landry bullshite
it's a cost/benefit analysis
i'll put it another way. we can only afford to pay 1 WR #1 money. do you want that to be Jarvis Landry or Mike Thomas?
Posted on 2/19/18 at 9:30 am to 50_Tiger
quote:
10 million im down for though
way too much given our roster and cap space
Posted on 2/19/18 at 9:30 am to htran90
I really like Landry as a player, but he's definitely not the style of WR this team would really need.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 9:31 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
it's a cost/benefit analysis
i'll put it another way. we can only afford to pay 1 WR #1 money. do you want that to be Jarvis Landry or Mike Thomas?
I'm signing everyone to three-year contracts or however long Brees impending guaranteed money will be for. As soon as he leaves we won't need their services anymore
Posted on 2/19/18 at 9:35 am to 50_Tiger
quote:
I'm signing everyone to three-year contracts or however long Brees impending guaranteed money will be for. As soon as he leaves we won't need their services anymore
there's no reason one of the top WR in free agency needs to just sign a 3 year deal though...
Posted on 2/19/18 at 9:50 am to Fun Bunch
Snead caught like 5 passes last year. How can anyone say Snead is better than Landry... I get Snead is way cheaper but he was very unproductive last season as well. Landry is a sure thing and would compliment well with Thomas
Posted on 2/19/18 at 9:52 am to htran90
quote:
there's no reason one of the top WR in free agency needs to just sign a 3 year deal though...
Plenty of top free agents take more guaranteed money in shorter year contracts.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 10:02 am to htran90
quote:
there's no reason one of the top WR in free agency needs to just sign a 3 year deal though...
Hit UFA again at 28 and cash in at the new market high.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 10:04 am to Macintosh
quote:
Snead caught like 5 passes last year. How can anyone say Snead is better than Landry... I get Snead is way cheaper but he was very unproductive last season as well. Landry is a sure thing and would compliment well with Thomas
I don't want to pay Landry but the people acting like we can count on Snead going forward are ridiculous.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 10:31 am to Lester Earl
9 TDs seems like eating to me
Posted on 2/19/18 at 10:38 am to Lester Earl
I want to reiterate though, I think signing Jarvis would be unwise. I would much rather us shore up the defense with that money and either pick a tight end in the draft or sign one. Mike Gesicki from Penn St is my dude. Don't know when he's supposed to go but he's gonna be a good on.
Page 7 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News