Started By
Message

I dont understand how anybody can not like Cooks for Butler.

Posted on 3/16/17 at 3:39 pm
Posted by LakeViewLSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2009
17730 posts
Posted on 3/16/17 at 3:39 pm
Unless you think that Butler wont be good here. That is the only reason a person could not like this trade.

1.Cooks had to go. He had already burned his bridge to staying here. He wanted out.

2.We were never getting a mid first round pick for him. He's just not worth it.

3. Butler will be more ready to play than any corner we would have gotten in the late first round and maybe the entire first round.

4. Recievers are less valuable to the Saints than a corner. Brees has proven to be able to succeed with an array of different recievers.

This post was edited on 3/16/17 at 4:09 pm
Posted by TheBeezer
Texas
Member since Apr 2013
1168 posts
Posted on 3/16/17 at 3:43 pm to
I like the Saints trading Cooks for Butler more than them actually using the 32nd pick in the draft. The last time the Saints did that trading Jimmy Graham and getting the Seahawks C Unger and then drafting their 32nd pick for LB Stephone Anthony hasn't paned out very well. For Anthony that is, not Unger. Unger's a beast.
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
30080 posts
Posted on 3/16/17 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

1.Cooks had to go. He had already burned his bridge to staying here. He wanted out.



he could have kept burning bridges, yet he was under contract for 2 more years for cheap and he was going to be productive.

quote:

2.We were never getting a mid first round pick for him. He's just not worth it.



yup

quote:

3. Butler will be more ready to play than any corner we would have gotten in the late first round and maybe the entire first round.



agreed, but people are mad because we could have signed bouye/gilmore who are the same or maybe a step below butler without giving up cooks/1st/whatever
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278156 posts
Posted on 3/16/17 at 3:47 pm to
because people like doing mock drafts and the more picks, the more fun. You take away 32 and people lose a talking point.
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
11850 posts
Posted on 3/16/17 at 3:55 pm to
It is because the team could have pursued a FA CB for probably a similar contract that they will have to pay Butler and STILL gotten value for Cooks if they wanted to trade him.
Posted by Spelt it rong
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2012
10001 posts
Posted on 3/16/17 at 4:16 pm to
quote:

It is because the team could have pursued a FA CB for probably a similar contract that they will have to pay Butler

Same ability to compliment that salary?
quote:

STILL gotten value for Cooks if they wanted to trade him.

Able to (potentially) sign Butler to a long term deal for the cost of a draft pick and a 5'-10" WR that doesn't go over the middle to a team that will probably use him exclusively in the middle? I loved Cooks during his time here, but he was never a Colston, Horn or even MT13 type to me.
Posted by whodatfan
Member since Mar 2008
21324 posts
Posted on 3/16/17 at 4:16 pm to
quote:

because people like doing mock drafts and the more picks, the more fun. You take away 32 and people lose a talking point.



Yeah, this is a reason.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278156 posts
Posted on 3/16/17 at 4:19 pm to
it sounds stupid, but it's a big part. It makes people over value that pick, for sure.
Posted by mitchleger
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2013
55 posts
Posted on 3/16/17 at 4:54 pm to
The answer is right in front of you.
1) The Patriots sign Gilmore for no draft picks. They then trade a player they will lose in a year for a player they will have for 5 years cheap. SMART
2) The Saints trade Cooks and a 4 for a 1 and 3. If we sign Butler for 32nd pick. We in effect traded Cooks in return for moving from the 11th pick in the 4th round to the last pick in the 3rd round. So Cooks went for 12 draft slots. NOT SMART
Butler can be had for no picks next year. Smart teams wait, get him in a year AND have the 32nd pick.
3) This draft is deep in the positions we need. Incompetence in drafting is not a valid excuse for not being smart.
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
59587 posts
Posted on 3/16/17 at 4:56 pm to
i am happy with it

cooks was laniappe
butler is needed
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64081 posts
Posted on 3/16/17 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

Unless you think that Butler wont be good here. That is the only reason a person could not like this trade.


This is my reasoning and it's not that I don't think he'll be good as just not worth a huge contract and worth a first rd pick for. Outside of Talib who is just a great talent in general and a year or so of welker with manning, I can't think of many players who played as well or improved for the team they left the patriots for. There may be others, I just can't think of any. The patriots have a great ability to let a guy go a year or two at most before their play starts to really decline. Now if we get him for a team friendly price I'll feel a lot different but I'm aftraid we're giving up and 1st and 10+ million a year for him.
Posted by t00f
Not where you think I am
Member since Jul 2016
89711 posts
Posted on 3/16/17 at 5:13 pm to
Cooks was drafted with a 1st and a 3rd, Butler was an undrafted free agent.

Butler got smoked by numerous number 1 receivers this year.
"Arizona’s Larry Fitzgerald lit up the Pats with eight catches for 81 yards and two touchdowns in Week 1, Miami’s Jarvis Landry hauled in 10 balls for 135 yards in Week 2, Buffalo’s Robert Woods had seven catches for 89 yards in Week 4, Cincy’s A.J. Green had six catches for 88 yards in Week 6, and Antonio Brown had seven grabs for 106 yards in Week 7."

We have had terrible luck trading and signing CB/S free agents in the past.

We drafted Cooks because we had no one that could take the top off and he had proven he can.

That said I am kinda OK with the trade, even at 32.
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
11850 posts
Posted on 3/16/17 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

quote:
quote:

It is because the team could have pursued a FA CB for probably a similar contract that they will have to pay Butler
Same ability to compliment that salary?
quote:

STILL gotten value for Cooks if they wanted to trade him.
Able to (potentially) sign Butler to a long term deal for the cost of a draft pick and a 5'-10" WR that doesn't go over the middle to a team that will probably use him exclusively in the middle? I loved Cooks during his time here, but he was never a Colston, Horn or even MT13 type to me.
Yes. I consider Gilmore and Bouye the same ability and neither would have cost any draft picks or players. Ryan is not too far behind either. So, I would have preferred signing one of them instead of giving up a #1 pick for the right to negotiate with Butler.
This post was edited on 3/16/17 at 5:16 pm
Posted by Brettesaurus Rex
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
38259 posts
Posted on 3/16/17 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

1.Cooks had to go. He had already burned his bridge to staying here. He wanted out.

Still think is overblown. In a vacuum I'd still want him here.

quote:

2.We were never getting a mid first round pick for him. He's just not worth it.

I think if we weren't in an extreme rush to ship him out to avoid the bonus then maybe. But maybe not as well.

quote:

3. Butler will be more ready to play than any corner we would have gotten in the late first round and maybe the entire first round.

Agreed. Considering we all know we need a CB why not just give the 32 back and get one of top currently playing.

quote:

4. Recievers are less valuable to the Saints than a corner. Brees has proven to be able to succeed with an array of different recievers.

Yes...to an extent. Before we rebuilt our WR corp the last year or two it was pretty painful. I mean yeah Brees is gonna throw for his yards, but we weren't having 3 1000 yard receivers like we did last year.
Posted by Brettesaurus Rex
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
38259 posts
Posted on 3/16/17 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

We have had terrible luck trading and signing CB/S free agents in the past.

We haven't had good DB play since 2013. I'll take my chances.
Posted by CocoLoco
Member since Jan 2012
29108 posts
Posted on 3/16/17 at 5:16 pm to
A)There is no guarantee they'd get Butler next year

B)New England could tag him next season

C)Corner is the hardest position to draft. Butler is top 10 at the position

D)Butler fills a position of need

E)They need to win now while Brees is still a high level
Posted by t00f
Not where you think I am
Member since Jul 2016
89711 posts
Posted on 3/16/17 at 5:17 pm to
quote:

We haven't had good DB play since 2013. I'll take my chances.


Lot of injuries, ranked number one this last year with 32 players on the IR alone.
Posted by CocoLoco
Member since Jan 2012
29108 posts
Posted on 3/16/17 at 5:17 pm to
quote:

I'm aftraid we're giving up and 1st


Could be, but I wouldn't be surprised at all if it is for less



quote:

10+ million a year for him



This will definitely happen. Gillmore got 13 per year.
Posted by Brettesaurus Rex
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
38259 posts
Posted on 3/16/17 at 5:21 pm to
Expecting him to get 10-12 pretty easily.

Butler, Breaux, Williams, Vaccaro, Bell could be a very good secondary if they all stay healthy.
Posted by lsusa
Doing Missionary work for LSU
Member since Oct 2005
4494 posts
Posted on 3/16/17 at 5:32 pm to
Hmmmm...

Saints get butler
#33 from Cleveland
#52 from Cleveland



Pats get
#11 from Saints
#12 from Cleveland
2018 1st Round Cleveland

Browns get
Garrapilo
2018 2nd from Pats
2018 2nd from Saints
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram