- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
"Experts" give Saints draft poor grade
Posted on 4/29/12 at 9:19 pm
Posted on 4/29/12 at 9:19 pm
LINK
Czarnecki grades it a D.
Kiper gives it a C-.
Prisco gives it an F.
Are these guys experts or a poor judge of talent?
What would Sean P grade it? Anyone interview him yet?
Czarnecki grades it a D.
Kiper gives it a C-.
Prisco gives it an F.
Are these guys experts or a poor judge of talent?
What would Sean P grade it? Anyone interview him yet?
This post was edited on 4/29/12 at 9:36 pm
5
Posted on 4/29/12 at 9:24 pm to djmicrobe
Posted on 4/29/12 at 9:26 pm to Bduhon55
How bout lets grade in a few years when they have played...
Posted on 4/29/12 at 9:29 pm to djmicrobe
There was a grade the draft thread already.
Posted on 4/29/12 at 9:32 pm to Patrick O Rly
Where?
Posted on 4/29/12 at 9:34 pm to Bduhon55
Thanks. I looked, but missed that one.
Posted on 4/29/12 at 9:36 pm to djmicrobe
As much as I was pulling for you, there were also already threads with the "Experts" opinions on the Saints' draft.
This post was edited on 4/29/12 at 9:36 pm
Posted on 4/29/12 at 9:37 pm to Bduhon55
Give me a minute and I'll start two threads. One on grade the draft and the other on what the experts say. Howdoyoulikethemapples?
Posted on 4/29/12 at 9:39 pm to VOR
Minute starting....NOW!
Posted on 4/29/12 at 9:41 pm to djmicrobe
quote:
Are these guys experts or a poor judge of talent?
I can't believe I'm saying this, because I love the shared indignation here as much as the next guy.
But I'm starting to think we're too sensitive around here.
Posted on 4/29/12 at 9:43 pm to Bduhon55
I saw the one about Kiper and Prisco, but not one about multiple experts grading the draft.
I'd like to know what people think about multiple experts giving poor grades for this draft.
I haven't seen one expert give a good grade, like a B.
I'd like to know what people think about multiple experts giving poor grades for this draft.
I haven't seen one expert give a good grade, like a B.
Posted on 4/29/12 at 9:44 pm to djmicrobe
Not sure why people care so much about these grades. Without even knowing who we picked how can you grade it accurately without us even having a first or second round pick?
Posted on 4/29/12 at 9:46 pm to djmicrobe
Thats because they seldomly go handing out B's. Most of them gave the Colts a "C" and they supposedly got the best player in the draft. Most of these guys know football, but grading a draft before seeing how the players actually performing should be left for the regular people like you and I.
Posted on 4/29/12 at 9:47 pm to Hoodoo Man
With these grades it means the "experts" are a poor judge of talent or the Saints FO are a poor judge of talent.
The FO drafted these guys, now "experts" are saying the draft sucked for the Saints.
They can't both be right. Either the FO got it right or wrong.
There is not sensitivity at all. I'd just like to know if this draft sucked like the experts grade suggests, or the Saints FO is way smarter than these "experts".
The FO drafted these guys, now "experts" are saying the draft sucked for the Saints.
They can't both be right. Either the FO got it right or wrong.
There is not sensitivity at all. I'd just like to know if this draft sucked like the experts grade suggests, or the Saints FO is way smarter than these "experts".
Posted on 4/29/12 at 9:49 pm to djmicrobe
Last year the "Experts" said and still say that the Mark Ingram trade was bad...as of right now that trade seems to be working out fine. The Saints got a good RB who with work and playing time can get better. He has shown no signs yet of being a bust or a bad pick. The Saints liked what they saw and wanted him on their roster badly enough to trade away a 1st round pick for him.
Posted on 4/29/12 at 10:02 pm to Bduhon55
quote:
The Saints liked what they saw and wanted him on their roster badly enough to trade away a 1st round pick for him.
Not to mention if we had the pick, Goodell would have taken it.
Posted on 4/29/12 at 10:03 pm to djmicrobe
I'm not calling you sensitive directly.
But this thread WAS meant to incite indignation at these stupid grades.
But this thread WAS meant to incite indignation at these stupid grades.
Posted on 4/29/12 at 10:04 pm to Bduhon55
quote:
Last year the "Experts" said and still say that the Mark Ingram trade was bad...as of right now that trade seems to be working out fine. The Saints got a good RB who with work and playing time can get better. He has shown no signs yet of being a bust or a bad pick. The Saints liked what they saw and wanted him on their roster badly enough to trade away a 1st round pick for him.
If Ingram doesn't stay healthy, he's a bust.
He absolutely HAS to stay healthy for me to consider him a good take.
Posted on 4/29/12 at 10:24 pm to Hoodoo Man
quote:
If Ingram doesn't stay healthy, he's a bust.
I feel the same way about every player ever drafted. So the post draft grades are still invalid.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News