- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Breaston, Crayton, Chase Thomas and Others Cut
Posted on 8/19/13 at 4:46 pm to Chad504boy
Posted on 8/19/13 at 4:46 pm to Chad504boy
Playing out like I thought. I just said the final spot or 2 for WR would come down to Roby, Parker, and Tanner and that Thomas was nothing more than a camp body now.
Not that it was hard to see. Nothing else is even worth mentioning.
Not that it was hard to see. Nothing else is even worth mentioning.
1
Posted on 8/19/13 at 4:46 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
Chase Thomas
goodnight sweet prince
Posted on 8/19/13 at 4:47 pm to St Augustine
How much playing time has he gotten in preseason? I haven't been able to watch a lot.
Posted on 8/19/13 at 4:50 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
Cut Breaston, Crayton.
clearing the way for Devery's return, right?
Posted on 8/19/13 at 4:51 pm to wildtigercat93
You need to RIP Saints Talk, k guy?
Posted on 8/19/13 at 4:52 pm to sicboy
Not much at all. Only 5 special team snaps in the Raiders game. He hasn't shown anything in camp or in the first game.
Posted on 8/19/13 at 5:09 pm to wildtigercat93
Posted on 8/19/13 at 5:11 pm to bonethug0108
The WR group should be:
Colston
Moore
Stills
Toon
Tanner
Parker
Parker can play special teams, and do what Roby did. He is also a better receiver. This would be a nice, versatile group.
Colston
Moore
Stills
Toon
Tanner
Parker
Parker can play special teams, and do what Roby did. He is also a better receiver. This would be a nice, versatile group.
This post was edited on 8/19/13 at 5:12 pm
Posted on 8/19/13 at 5:17 pm to CocoLoco
quote:
The WR group should be:
Colston
Moore
Stills
Toon
Tanner
Parker
Parker can play special teams, and do what Roby did. He is also a better receiver. This would be a nice, versatile group.
I like this group, but are we keeping 6?
And I'd have Parker over Tanner at this point with the edge definitely coming on kick returns.
Posted on 8/19/13 at 5:20 pm to CocoLoco
I think Roby gets cut as well. Watch out for Hakim, his ST play in college was very impressive. I like his potential as a deep threat and his ability as a gunner.
With that said, I still think he gets cut. Maybe PS for him.
With that said, I still think he gets cut. Maybe PS for him.
Posted on 8/19/13 at 5:28 pm to Lsuismyfav
Colston
Moore
Toon
Stills
Parker
Roby
Moore
Toon
Stills
Parker
Roby
Posted on 8/19/13 at 5:29 pm to Lsuismyfav
quote:
Watch out for Hakim, his ST play in college was very impressive. I like his potential as a deep threat and his ability as a gunner.
Besides getting where's he's going really fast, I haven't seen him do much. Parker on the other hand has done nothing but produce so I don't see room for Hakim. I agree he won't make it; I think he's in the next round of cuts.
Posted on 8/19/13 at 5:30 pm to kclsufan
quote:
Besides getting where's he's going really fast, I haven't seen him do much.
Hakim seems to have stone hands.
Posted on 8/19/13 at 5:39 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
Colston
Moore
Toon
Stills
Parker
Roby
Yes.
Posted on 8/19/13 at 5:52 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
Colston
Moore
Toon
Stills
Parker
Roby
Roby vs. Tanner is an interesting matchup. I think Tanner is a better pure receiver and Parker basically nixes Roby's advantage as a KR. I haven't seen Parker as a gunner though. However Roby is a very solid gunner.
Posted on 8/19/13 at 5:58 pm to kclsufan
How many times can a player be on the practice squad because Tanner is a prime candidate for PS.
Posted on 8/19/13 at 5:59 pm to kclsufan
Roby hasn't even been the primary returner the last couple of seasons. He's been making it on his gunner/kickoff coverage skills alone.
That could still get him a spot over Tanner as they have what seems to be 5 legit receivers in the other guys.
That's why in my 53 projection I have Roby just beating out Tanner, but if Tanner does really well the next 2 games it will be hard to ignore him. He really needs to contribute on special teams in some way.
As for the do we keep 6 question, we have I think every year since Payton has been here and the only way that changes is if one of the young LBs stands out enough (Johnson, Martin, or Reddick).
Edit:
I'm not sure if he's eligible but if so he's definitely going.
That could still get him a spot over Tanner as they have what seems to be 5 legit receivers in the other guys.
That's why in my 53 projection I have Roby just beating out Tanner, but if Tanner does really well the next 2 games it will be hard to ignore him. He really needs to contribute on special teams in some way.
As for the do we keep 6 question, we have I think every year since Payton has been here and the only way that changes is if one of the young LBs stands out enough (Johnson, Martin, or Reddick).
Edit:
I'm not sure if he's eligible but if so he's definitely going.
This post was edited on 8/19/13 at 6:01 pm
Posted on 8/19/13 at 6:01 pm to kclsufan
quote:
Roby vs. Tanner is an interesting matchup.
Not really, tanner is a non needed slot guy with Moore and stills
Posted on 8/19/13 at 6:06 pm to bonethug0108
quote:
That's why in my 53 projection I have Roby just beating out Tanner, but if Tanner does really well the next 2 games it will be hard to ignore him
I see him as easier to replace than Parker and Roby so I think he's odd man out.
This post was edited on 8/19/13 at 6:09 pm
Posted on 8/19/13 at 6:06 pm to Chad504boy
Is Chase Thomas the cat from Stanford?
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News