- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Would the Hornets have beaten the Lakers and then the Celtics in 08?
Posted on 4/23/14 at 2:53 pm to Boomshockalocka
Posted on 4/23/14 at 2:53 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:
Portland has one the best starting 5s this year, nobody considers them contenders.
Portland does not have a top 5, top 3 caliber player on their roster. Chris Paul was in that category in 2008. You don't compete for titles without that unless your mid 2000s Detroit.
2
Posted on 4/23/14 at 2:54 pm to htran90
quote:
not getting more into it, the statlines across the board is roughly the same
please don't, you couldn't post stats more useless if you tried
comparing the pfs and C#s points and rebounds like it is any type of valid comparison
Posted on 4/23/14 at 2:54 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:
No and they proved it by losing in the conference semis to a team who got smoked 4-1 in the next series.
yeah because matchups don't matter at all.
stop being a trolling dumbass
Posted on 4/23/14 at 2:55 pm to NIH
quote:
Portland does not have a top 5, top 3 caliber player on their roster. Chris Paul was in that category in 2008. You don't compete for titles without that unless your mid 2000s Detroit.
Aldridge is playing like the best big in the league right now. If Portland was to win the championship on Aldridges back no would not have him in their top 5.
Posted on 4/23/14 at 2:56 pm to quail man
quote:
yeah because matchups don't matter at all.
stop being a trolling dumbass
the trolls are the ones saying that team was a contender. And good job picking out one sentence and ignoring the rest, bitch.
Posted on 4/23/14 at 2:57 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:
Aldridge is playing like the best big in the league right now
He's playing against a center who is soft as cotton, of course he's dominating right now.
Posted on 4/23/14 at 2:59 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
He's playing against a center who is soft as cotton, of course he's dominating right now.
someone wasn't watching game 1
Posted on 4/23/14 at 3:00 pm to Boomshockalocka
watched every minute
Dwight gets his stats, but he's a mental midget.
Dwight gets his stats, but he's a mental midget.
Posted on 4/23/14 at 3:01 pm to Boomshockalocka
kinda like you just did to a previous poster.
Posted on 4/23/14 at 3:01 pm to NIH
quote:
Portland does not have a top 5, top 3 caliber player on their roster
what about the spurs last year?
or indy last year?
You are silly.
Posted on 4/23/14 at 3:02 pm to NawlinsTiger9
How about the fact that dwight doesnt guard Aldridge? Yea i think you might've missed that homie.
Posted on 4/23/14 at 3:12 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:
The Clippers have been top 5 on offense and defense all year, they are no slouch
1st in off and 14th in def.
quote:
They upgraded their coaching. Jordan and Griffin are much improved.
Outside of jordan's minutes and PER36 rebounds and slight up in bpg, he didn't improve much.
Griffin's ppg went up but so did his fga per game.
So not really that much improved. Coaching is 100% guarantee.
quote:
the trolls are the ones saying that team was a contender. And good job picking out one sentence and ignoring the rest, bitch.
you're complaining that people do that? you're a little bitch to even come back with that LOL
quote:
How old are you? This is clearly not the case. There were 6 teams within 3 games of the top seed in the West.
Outside of SA, 2->5 ranked teams, only 5 games separate them
In '07-08 from 1->8 is 7 wins.
They would have had to go through:
51-31 dallas
56-26 san antonio
57-25 los angeles
or
potentially:
51-31 GS
59-23 OKC
62-20 SA
just to get to the finals, that path is already harder compared to '07-'08
quote:
Every playoff team had 50 wins.
yeah, okay. Every playoff team has 49 wins this year.
Cumulatively, 07-08's playoff teams were
434-222
This year's playoff teams are:
436-220
So yeah, this year's is better, even slightly since you always want to nitpick.
quote:
The Lakers that season were better than any team they have to face in the West this year.
If they were so great how come they were ranked 4th offensively and 19th defensively? Since you always want cold hard facts.
quote:quote:
How about the fact that dwight doesnt guard Aldridge? Yea i think you might've missed that homie.
Because terrance Jones is even close to a top 5 PF to defend aldridge.
This post was edited on 4/23/14 at 3:15 pm
Posted on 4/23/14 at 3:13 pm to Boomshockalocka
so your defensive anchor of a center did nothing to prevent a PF from hanging half a hundred and 18 boards on your team at home in the playoffs?
And you're defending his mental toughness?
And you're defending his mental toughness?
Posted on 4/23/14 at 3:14 pm to NawlinsTiger9
Posted on 4/23/14 at 3:18 pm to htran90
quote:
1st in off and 14th in def.
they finished the season 1st and 7th defensively. They were top 5 most of the year. IDK where you get 14 from
LINK
quote:
Outside of SA, 2->5 ranked teams, only 5 games separate them
No not outside of SA. They WERE 6 teams within 3 games of the top seed. That's less than 5 games and we aren't excluding any teams. What part of 1 game out of the 6 seed do you not understand?
quote:
If they were so great how come they were ranked 4th offensively and 19th defensively? Since you always want cold hard facts.
They coasted the whole season, they were clearly the team to beat entering the playoffs. And no telling what #s you are going with since you didnt use the efficiency #s for the clippers this year.
quote:
Outside of SA, 2->5 ranked teams, only 5 games separate them
In '07-08 from 1->8 is 7 wins.
They would have had to go through:
51-31 dallas
56-26 san antonio
57-25 los angeles
or
potentially:
51-31 GS
59-23 OKC
62-20 SA
just to get to the finals, that path is already harder compared to '07-'08
Dude this is all nonsense. not even worth responding to. this is almost as bad as you comparing the 2 teams by posting the starting front courts ppg and rebound per game #s.
This post was edited on 4/23/14 at 3:21 pm
Posted on 4/23/14 at 3:19 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
so your defensive anchor of a center did nothing to prevent a PF from hanging half a hundred and 18 boards on your team at home in the playoffs?
And you're defending his mental toughness
IF dwight covers him the whole game of course he doesn't sniff those #s.
Posted on 4/23/14 at 3:19 pm to Boomshockalocka
Just because I think you're a fricking retard that needs #s
SA: 6th offense, 6th defense; 105.4ppg - 97.6ppg (+7.8)
OKC: 5th offense, 12th defense; 106.2ppg - 99.8ppg (+6.4)
GSW: 10th offense, 10th defense; 104.3ppg - 99.5ppg (+4.8)
compared to:
DAL: 12th offense, 6th defense; 100.4ppg - 95.9ppg (+4.5)
SAS: 28th offense, 3rd defense; 95.4ppg - 90.6ppg (+4.8)
LAL: 4th offense, 19th defense; 108.6ppg - 101.3ppg (+7.3)
SA: 6th offense, 6th defense; 105.4ppg - 97.6ppg (+7.8)
OKC: 5th offense, 12th defense; 106.2ppg - 99.8ppg (+6.4)
GSW: 10th offense, 10th defense; 104.3ppg - 99.5ppg (+4.8)
compared to:
DAL: 12th offense, 6th defense; 100.4ppg - 95.9ppg (+4.5)
SAS: 28th offense, 3rd defense; 95.4ppg - 90.6ppg (+4.8)
LAL: 4th offense, 19th defense; 108.6ppg - 101.3ppg (+7.3)
Posted on 4/23/14 at 3:24 pm to htran90
who knows what #s you are using dud? You def aren't using the offensive and defensive efficiency #s.
You def aren't using the offensive and defensive efficiency #s. Posted on 4/23/14 at 3:25 pm to Boomshockalocka
yeah because hard numbers are too hard for you to understand right?
Okay lets eyeball test it.
Running through durant + co this year and the same old spurs is easier than a worse spurs team and a lakers team that 'coasted'
Okay lets eyeball test it.
Running through durant + co this year and the same old spurs is easier than a worse spurs team and a lakers team that 'coasted'
Posted on 4/23/14 at 3:26 pm to htran90
quote:
LAL: 4th offense, 19th defense; 108.6ppg - 101.3ppg (+7.3)
Just looked up the Lakers only/// they were 9th defensively. Honestly bro, save yourself the time and don't look up anymore #s bc they ain't worth the time it takes for you to type them out. You are looking at the wrong numbers.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News