Started By
Message

re: Talent v Fit

Posted on 6/21/13 at 12:10 pm to
Posted by Fearthehat0307
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2007
65256 posts
Posted on 6/21/13 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

I suppose you're a general manager, right?
nah but I did stay at a holiday inn express last night

quote:

If not, our opinions are just that, opinions
so general managers opinions are facts?

quote:

IMO Len has upside, because of his size but his talent seems to be lacking.

you can't teach size. he got a very high ceiling imo. don't know if he'll reach it but worth the risk imo
This post was edited on 6/21/13 at 12:11 pm
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 6/21/13 at 5:10 pm to
I'd think you'd be better off building a system around the players, not vice versa.
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
63326 posts
Posted on 6/21/13 at 6:08 pm to
If the talent difference is really substantial, my inclination in basketball is to go with BPA (assuming the guy has no issues). I think all star level is tough to pass up. Now it may be different if you're really set at a position. Even then, there are so many possible options for using different lineups in different situations. I'm not as fixated on clearly defined positions as I once was.

Now if there is a glaring need at a "position", maybe you analyze the choice differently.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram