Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Springer vs Cam Thomas

Posted on 7/15/21 at 8:43 pm
Posted by Pelicans4Real
Member since Jun 2019
168 posts
Posted on 7/15/21 at 8:43 pm
Any preference of the two and could either go at 10?
Posted by CP3forMVP
Member since Nov 2010
14859 posts
Posted on 7/15/21 at 8:57 pm to
I don’t think either go around 10 but Springer seems to be killing draft workouts so that could change in a week.

As for preference I’m not completely sure, but I think I would go Springer. More upside as a complete player.
Posted by Macintosh504
Leveraging Salaries University
Member since Sep 2011
52528 posts
Posted on 7/15/21 at 9:01 pm to
Springer 100%
Posted by Chalkywhite84
New orleans
Member since Dec 2016
27025 posts
Posted on 7/15/21 at 9:08 pm to
I think cam thomas has more upside.

Springer has a higher floor to me.


Jaden springer has that old school guard kinda feel to me.
Posted by LilWezyAna
BR
Member since Feb 2016
3138 posts
Posted on 7/15/21 at 9:14 pm to
Jaden Springer seems like he can be similar to Brogdon or Derrick White. Cam could either be better than CJ Mccollum or he could be worse than Collin Sexton
Posted by CP3forMVP
Member since Nov 2010
14859 posts
Posted on 7/15/21 at 9:26 pm to
quote:

I think cam thomas has more upside.


Cam is such a one dimensional player that I think that really limits his effectiveness. I don’t see him with much upside defensively, as a playmaker, etc.

Springer has upside in all those areas.
Posted by polarbear6
Member since Mar 2011
549 posts
Posted on 7/15/21 at 10:08 pm to
Springer going away . Cam is an elite scorer , but I’ve followed LSU bball my whole life and I’ve never seen someone that bad defensively . If cam goes to the right team he can have a really good career , I just don’t think that team currently would be the Pelicans
Posted by 3PieceSpicy
Metairie
Member since Jan 2021
6223 posts
Posted on 7/15/21 at 10:09 pm to
quote:

Could be better than CJ or he could be worse than Sexton


What does this even mean?

Sexton as a 22 year old is arguably better than CJ is now. If you look at CJ’s stats the last 5 years, he’s basically what Sexton did this year. Sexton could end up being far better than CJ or he could level off and simply have a CJ like career which is very respectable.

I think a less confusing and more accurate statement would be. Cam’s ceiling is above CJ Mc and his floor is below Marcus Thorton’s. There is enough difference in those 2 players careers to say something like that lol.

Seeing a bunch if downvotes which I don’t care about, but it shows me people still have a stick up their arse about Sexton and/or don’t know anything about him. CJ’s best season is only a tiny bit better than what Sexton did at age 22 and CJ’s age 22 season wasn’t even close to Sexton’s.

That’s not even the point though. Your ceiling can’t be better than CJ McCollum and your floor can’t be worse than Colin Sexton. The players and the career outcomes are too similar. Wasn’t trying to hate, but the analogy or whatever it was wasn’t that clear based on the 2 players that were used.

If Cam Thomas’s worst is slightly lower than Collin Sexton at age 22, you sprint to the motherfrickin podium and take him. I don’t think that’s an accurate assessment though.

Also, he was elite at getting to the FT line in college, but I doubt he earns that kind of respect from NBA refs early on. He didn’t even get respect from the refs in LSU’s tourney game against Michigan.
This post was edited on 7/16/21 at 2:34 am
Posted by kadillak
Member since Nov 2007
7641 posts
Posted on 7/15/21 at 10:12 pm to
I think Springer has the higher upside and I could see him being a top 10 pick. I'm not sure there's a huge weakness to point at in his game. He really picked up his assertiveness in the second half of the season which was a concern early in the year. I think athleticism in some ways was a concern too but from the sounds of it, he looks more explosive in workouts being more fully recovered from injury. Also helps that he's one of the youngest in his class. I like that he shot it well from deep with good volume and can impact the game in a lot of different ways without the ball in his hands. After Moody and Giddey, I think Springer would be my next choice if we are picking a guard.

It's hard for me to buy Cam getting picked at 10, but it just takes one team to fall in love with him like Phoenix and Cam Johnson. His foul drawing is an elite coveted skill and appears to have strong work ethic. Shot selection, point of attack defense, and just overall lack of focus on defense are huge concerns though.
This post was edited on 7/15/21 at 10:18 pm
Posted by SouthMSReb
Member since Dec 2013
4411 posts
Posted on 7/15/21 at 10:22 pm to
Cam = Swaggy P

And that’s a naw for me dawg
Posted by CP3forMVP
Member since Nov 2010
14859 posts
Posted on 7/16/21 at 7:36 am to
quote:

Cam is an elite scorer


It's honestly hard for me to even call him an elite scorer. He can get hot, no doubt, but he also had stretches of the season when he was incredibly inefficient. The first 10 games of SEC play he shot 36.5% from the field. Shot 36.2% in SEC and NCAA Tourney play, actually 32.2% from 2 and his 3pt shooting (which was also bad in SEC play, 28.9%) boosted his shooting percentages to 36%.

The guy can score no doubt, but it's hard for me to see him scoring at such a level that it offsets his lack of ability in other areas.
Posted by YungFO
Dallas
Member since Mar 2018
1046 posts
Posted on 7/16/21 at 8:42 am to
I agree with everything you said, but let me let you in on a secret. Don't come to this board for rational basketball talk. Most people on here have homer glasses on or are just total morons.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115441 posts
Posted on 7/16/21 at 8:44 am to
Springer is getting a lot of buzz right now. Seems he's going to go higher than the mockers predicted.
Posted by NOFOX
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2014
9932 posts
Posted on 7/16/21 at 12:04 pm to
Springer if we are picking at 10, though if we end up trading back, then I would not mind Cam as a microwave scorer off the bench in a LouWill, Clarkson, Crawford type of role.
Posted by DallasTiger45
Member since May 2012
8419 posts
Posted on 7/16/21 at 12:12 pm to
I don't think Cam Thomas is worthy of the 10th overall pick, but I'll never understand why people think some skills can be developed (shooting, ball handling, etc.) and others can't (defense, in this case).

Does Cam Thomas lack the tools to be an average defensive player? I don't think so. He's solid athletically, and very strong for his age. Good frame to add good weight. Some guys just can't be decent defensively due to foot speed or size. I don't see that with Cam.

Was he lazy defensively at LSU? Yes, absolutely. Will he be lazy defensively in the NBA? I have no idea. That's on the scouts and coaching staff to decipher during interviews, just like they do when projecting guys will improve their other skills.
Posted by NOFOX
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2014
9932 posts
Posted on 7/16/21 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

hink Cam Thomas is worthy of the 10th overall pick, but I'll never understand why people think some skills can be developed (shooting, ball handling, etc.) and others can't (defense, in this case).


Historically it's easier to develop certain skills than others, but in general if Cam's defense improves, it likely won't be on his first contract.
Posted by bugafor6
Member since Feb 2016
4200 posts
Posted on 7/17/21 at 8:48 am to
quote:

It's honestly hard for me to even call him an elite scorer. He can get hot, no doubt, but he also had stretches of the season when he was incredibly inefficient. The first 10 games of SEC play he shot 36.5% from the field. Shot 36.2% in SEC and NCAA Tourney play, actually 32.2% from 2 and his 3pt shooting (which was also bad in SEC play, 28.9%) boosted his shooting percentages to 36%.

The guy can score no doubt, but it's hard for me to see him scoring at such a level that it offsets his lack of ability in other areas.


I’m not sure if he had a complete efficient game all year. He jacked up so many shots that there was just no possible way he could end up hitting most of them in a single game. It seemed like his typical stat line was 5-16 FG with 9-11 FT. Even in his last game, I think he started off 7-7 then ended 10-23. Even when he couldn’t buy a basket the dude would just shoot. It was maddening.

The lack of defense and playmaking is just from a refusal to do anything but score. His absolute ceiling is a microwave 6th man. Im not sure how he even gets first round hype.
Posted by 3PieceSpicy
Metairie
Member since Jan 2021
6223 posts
Posted on 7/17/21 at 10:24 am to
To be fair, the last game he finished 10-23, he got fouled a million times in. Refs swallowed their whistles. He might have missed 4 legitimate shots that game.

But in general, you are right, he is extremely inefficient if he’s not getting enough free throws to offset his high volume of low quality shots that he takes.

The thing that makes him especially difficult to project is that he was the clear number 1 option in college. He is going to be the 4th or 5th offensive option when he steps on the floor in the nba, so maybe he will be more efficient when the defense doesn’t really center their defensive gameplan around stopping him and he’s only allowed to take wide open shots or he’s shipped off to the g league.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram