- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/13/23 at 8:52 pm to Pels_Yaz
quote:He asks a question and you claim it is a rumor. That is not the same.
Those are facts lol How the hell am I skewing the narrative???!! Lol those were your own words. I think you need to chill with this. He literally talked about whether Pels would include Zion. I mean its like you want to ignore that was even in the video. Do you secretly work PR for the pelicans or something lol???
Posted on 6/13/23 at 8:52 pm to NOSHAU
Lol oh shite I just found Zions stepdad on tigerdroppings. How you doing Mr. Lee?
Posted on 6/13/23 at 8:53 pm to Pels_Yaz
quote:
If she signed a NDA yes lol. You have no idea what a NDA is if you think she would have talked lol
This dude is fricking clueless lol
Posted on 6/13/23 at 8:54 pm to NOSHAU
The video clip of him was one video where he talked about the pelicans trading up rumor and mentioned Zion. He didn’t cut the video clips in two- it was the same video. You are literally out of control on your takes today lol
Posted on 6/13/23 at 8:55 pm to TackySweater
quote:I work with NDAs. They are difficult to structure to prevent every event and sometimes even harder to enforce, particularly against an individual (instead of a corporation). The information would already be out there and he would be unable to take the words back. That is where the damage is, not the money she makes (which is peanuts to him).
You keep showing yourself to be more and more clueless lol.
She’s talking to get famous and “pub” so she can make money
An NDA can specifically take her money
So no she wouldn’t be doing this if she signs an nda
Posted on 6/13/23 at 8:55 pm to TackySweater
Lol name a woman who spoke out on an athlete after signing a NDA?? Go ahead find just one. I’m clueless. Your just making dumb takes and cant defend them.
Posted on 6/13/23 at 8:58 pm to NOSHAU
quote:
The information would already be out there and he would be unable to take the words back. That is where the damage is, not the money she makes (which is peanuts to him).
So she can make zion look bad but be broke? Sure, I’m sure she would love to do that lol
Posted on 6/13/23 at 8:58 pm to Pels_Yaz
quote:Either your comprehension is not there or you are simply another troll on this board. Given your account date, I am assuming an alter. The "rumor" he reported was that they were aggressively pursuing a trade up to get Scoot. I think we agree on that. Then he asks the question about whether the Pelicans internally would discuss including Zion. That part is a question, not a rumor.
The video clip of him was one video where he talked about the pelicans trading up rumor and mentioned Zion. He didn’t cut the video clips in two- it was the same video. You are literally out of control on your takes today lol
This post was edited on 6/13/23 at 8:59 pm
Posted on 6/13/23 at 8:58 pm to NOSHAU
Lol you suck at your job then. Lot of athletes make women sign NDAs. If they cant be structured for that purpose they’re useless. Im a legal professional, NDAs are no joke. So get out of here with that BS.
Posted on 6/13/23 at 8:58 pm to Pels_Yaz
quote:
Lol name a woman who spoke out on an athlete after signing a NDA?? Go ahead find just one. I’m clueless. Your just making dumb takes and cant defend them.
I mean the guy you were responding to. I agree with you.
Posted on 6/13/23 at 8:59 pm to NOSHAU
Its in the same video. I didn’t skew it. I stated facts. Your Zion kissing arse just cant stand they mentioned him in the video.
Posted on 6/13/23 at 9:00 pm to Dinky Mulberry
quote:
Are you actually talking about BI's contract situation?
I am indeed. You have to at least make an all-NBA team in order to qualify for more than 25% of the league cap. He hasn’t done that, so I don’t see how his future contract is drastically different from his current
Posted on 6/13/23 at 9:04 pm to SCLSUMuddogs
quote:
I am indeed. You have to at least make an all-NBA team in order to qualify for more than 25% of the league cap. He hasn’t done that, so I don’t see how his future contract is drastically different from his current
That’s not how it works. I don’t have time to look up the years played for each level, but basically 2nd contract =25%, 3rd contract =30%, 4th contract =35%, and the different qualifications like Rose Rule let the players skip ahead to the next level.
This post was edited on 6/13/23 at 9:05 pm
Posted on 6/13/23 at 9:05 pm to Pels_Yaz
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/13/23 at 10:35 pm
Posted on 6/13/23 at 9:05 pm to SCLSUMuddogs
quote:It will start as a percentage of a larger cap upon renewal and then increase from there. He will also be eligible for a higher % based on tenure I think.
I am indeed. You have to at least make an all-NBA team in order to qualify for more than 25% of the league cap. He hasn’t done that, so I don’t see how his future contract is drastically different from his current
This post was edited on 6/13/23 at 9:07 pm
Posted on 6/13/23 at 9:05 pm to TigerinATL
I must be thinking of the supermax, either way though, it’s not like the extra 5% constituents waaaaay more
Posted on 6/13/23 at 9:06 pm to SCLSUMuddogs
quote:
am indeed. You have to at least make an all-NBA team in order to qualify for more than 25% of the league cap. He hasn’t done that, so I don’t see how his future contract is drastically different from his current
Ingram is eligible for 30% max on his next deal as he’s been in the league 8 years.
Posted on 6/13/23 at 9:09 pm to Soggymoss
Lol I got it guys, thank you for the rapid responses
Posted on 6/13/23 at 9:11 pm to NOSHAU
Just because you been on this board longer doesn’t mean you have good takes. Im not disagreeing with you. But its also a fact that in the same video he mentioned the trade rumor he answered a question about whether pelicans should include Zion in the trade and then gave his opinion. Again one video it wasn’t two different video clips. It seems its your assumption thats its insignificant and it doesn’t matter (again I could be wrong but just reading between your takes); people can also assume otherwise. Your takes are legally wrong(NDA), sexist(Zion’s ex trash) and extremely biased towards Zion. But i guess its ok because you been making trash takes on here longer than I joined. So go ahead take your seniority tigerdroppings trash takes, you’ve earned it for being a long time message board member.
Popular
Back to top


0




