- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rumors online is Dearron Fox will like to be traded to NOLA
Posted on 1/20/22 at 8:28 am to NOSHAU
Posted on 1/20/22 at 8:28 am to NOSHAU
quote:
we could send 3 1sts (maybe a LAL and 2 Bucks picks) to Pacers along with bench players like Hayes, Sato, Temple, Kira,
So you want to send out half the picks we got in the AD and Jrue trades and likely the best three out of both of the trades along with two lottery pick players we drafted? So a total of 5 frp or players just for Fox??? That’s a hella of alot more than what we got for Jrue.
3
Posted on 1/20/22 at 8:59 am to Townedrunkard
quote:
along with two lottery pick players we drafted
rate hayes for us.
can he start for a playin level team?
after all you can start anyone but is that guy a net plus?
rate kiras defense.
rate kiras 3 pt shooting.
rate kira going hard to the hole.
Posted on 1/20/22 at 10:22 am to Townedrunkard
I agree 3 1sts would be much. Temple, Kira, and Sato are a meaningless 18 mil right now so idk what you are talking about. Hayes could be worth it to develop but you shouldn’t let him stop you from getting a star or great player. It’s not hella a lot more than the Jrue trade and Fox is a 24 y/o who has been on the edge of all star appearances.
You could argue Adams/ Bledsoe are about the same return as Hayes, Sato, Temple, Kira. We got 2 1sts and a future swap. That’s way different than 3 1st for someone who is 6 years younger at the time of the trade?
You could argue Adams/ Bledsoe are about the same return as Hayes, Sato, Temple, Kira. We got 2 1sts and a future swap. That’s way different than 3 1st for someone who is 6 years younger at the time of the trade?
Posted on 1/20/22 at 10:37 am to Dantheman504
This could be somewhat of a realistic offer as well. They could want 2 1sts, Sato, and Hart for Fox. Or 3 1sts Sato, Kira, Hayes, Temple. The 5 frp thing only works if they are worth a shite. You’d rather us add Herb in there instead of Hayes and Kira because he was picked in the 2nd round?
This post was edited on 1/20/22 at 10:38 am
Posted on 1/20/22 at 10:38 am to Dantheman504
Fox seems like a poor man's Westbrook. No thanks.
Posted on 1/20/22 at 12:12 pm to ghost2most
quote:
Fox seems like a poor man's Westbrook. No thanks.
I completely understand your point especially with his contract, but a poor man's Westbrook would be a huge improvement for us. Right now we have a poor man's Lonzo Ball
Posted on 1/20/22 at 1:39 pm to saintslsupels
I don't think there is anything poorer then Westbrook now. He has got to be the worst player in the NBA
Posted on 1/20/22 at 2:50 pm to Townedrunkard
quote:Hayes and Kira have very little value. Neither have shown to be anything more than fringe NBA players thus far. The 3 FRP are not overly desirable given they are Laker/Bucks picks. What have we gotten for the Lakers assets thus far? This is a far better return and still allows us to keep our picks.
So you want to send out half the picks we got in the AD and Jrue trades and likely the best three out of both of the trades along with two lottery pick players we drafted? So a total of 5 frp or players just for Fox??? That’s a hella of alot more than what we got for Jrue.
Posted on 1/20/22 at 6:09 pm to NOSHAU
quote:
The 3 FRP are not overly desirable given they are Laker/Bucks picks. What have we gotten for the Lakers assets thus far? This is a far better return and still allows us to keep our picks.
What? The bucks picks are 3 and 5 years out. You honestly think that team will look the same a half decade from now? And look at the lakers, already trending down. And we can get their pick another two years from now. It just might be valuable.
Some of you are so shortsighted. No way I’m giving up that last lakers pick or that last bucks pick. They are untouchable.
Hell the one this year looks like it might be right outside the lottery which is still a pretty good pick. Players like Herro and Halliburton have went in that range recently. Just have to know how to draft….
We could have had Garland with one of the lakers picks if Griff wasn’t an idiot…
This post was edited on 1/20/22 at 6:11 pm
Posted on 1/20/22 at 6:32 pm to Townedrunkard
Herro and Haliburton were both inside the lottery
Posted on 1/21/22 at 12:03 am to Townedrunkard
quote:Reread. I did not say leave them unprotected. I said we would have to decide the protections to add.
What? The bucks picks are 3 and 5 years out. You honestly think that team will look the same a half decade from now? And look at the lakers, already trending down. And we can get their pick another two years from now. It just might be valuable.
Some of you are so shortsighted. No way I’m giving up that last lakers pick or that last bucks pick. They are untouchable.
Hell the one this year looks like it might be right outside the lottery which is still a pretty good pick. Players like Herro and Halliburton have went in that range recently. Just have to know how to draft….
We could have had Garland with one of the lakers picks if Griff wasn’t an idiot…
Posted on 1/21/22 at 8:06 am to Townedrunkard
quote:
No way I’m giving up that last lakers pick or that last bucks pick. They are untouchable.
I also agree.
Unprotected they are pretty much untouchable, unless it gets us a star, and i wouldn't deem Fox that star i'd give up those picks for.
I would be willing to trade them if they are lottery protected.
The Lakers pick in 2025 could be a top 5 pick.
The Bucks 25 pick is going to be late lottery unless Giannis is out for the year. The 27 pick is too far out there to have any indication of what it might be. At this point, you have to assume Giannis isn't going anywhere anytime soon, and even if they start slipping and he asks to be traded, they are going to get a kings ransom for him so they probably still won't be a bad team unless they go full rebuild, but again, it's way too early to see that.
Page 10 of 10
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News