- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Official AD Trade Thread - 6/4 - Griff is fielding offers
Posted on 6/5/19 at 10:24 am to Epic Cajun
Posted on 6/5/19 at 10:24 am to Epic Cajun
Sign and trades are like unicorns.
Posted on 6/5/19 at 10:25 am to Epic Cajun
show me a scenario in which d'angelo russell can be traded to the pelicans as part of an anthony davis trade.
i suspect we are just splitting hairs here on terminology
i suspect we are just splitting hairs here on terminology
Posted on 6/5/19 at 10:26 am to Solo
quote:
Sign and trades are like unicorns.
I'm not saying it's likely at all. Just that it's possible.
Posted on 6/5/19 at 10:27 am to cgrand
quote:
show me a scenario in which d'angelo russell can be traded to the pelicans as part of an anthony davis trade.
i suspect we are just splitting hairs here on terminology
What rule do you think that trade would violate? I've seen quite a few people mention that it wasn't possible, so I searched all throughout the CBA FAQ and came up empty.
Posted on 6/5/19 at 10:35 am to Epic Cajun
i always remember hearing you can't S&T players with other players involved in the trade, but looking in the CBA i didn't see that mentioned as a restriction either.
I think where the trouble falls is matching salaries, and having both team really needing to have cap space available to make the trade work.
IF DLo gets a $30M salary, we take on the $30M, but are matching only $15M, so we have to have the cap space to sign him, unless the Nets have the cap space to accept more than $15M in return in the trade.
I think where the trouble falls is matching salaries, and having both team really needing to have cap space available to make the trade work.
IF DLo gets a $30M salary, we take on the $30M, but are matching only $15M, so we have to have the cap space to sign him, unless the Nets have the cap space to accept more than $15M in return in the trade.
Posted on 6/5/19 at 10:57 am to TeddyPadillac
quote:
i always remember hearing you can't S&T players with other players involved in the trade, but looking in the CBA i didn't see that mentioned as a restriction either.
Same, which is why I initially looked into it a couple weeks ago.
quote:
I think where the trouble falls is matching salaries, and having both team really needing to have cap space available to make the trade work.
Right, but we will both have cap space, so it wouldn't really matter.
Regardless, I doubt a Nets trade happens. To many hurdles to cross, and too many other deals that are just better.
Posted on 6/5/19 at 11:44 am to Epic Cajun
agreed, lets move on
some news:
danny ainge held a presser today, his first after his medical scare. highlights
* His role with team will not change
* Kyrie Irving has given no indication about his future
* Brad Stevens is least of Danny’s worries
* Ainge reiterates he’s not afraid of risks
* Bullish on 2019-20 Gordon Hayward
i am convinced that hayward will be part of BOS's offer(s) for davis. whether you think thats a good thing or not for the pels may vary
some news:
danny ainge held a presser today, his first after his medical scare. highlights
* His role with team will not change
* Kyrie Irving has given no indication about his future
* Brad Stevens is least of Danny’s worries
* Ainge reiterates he’s not afraid of risks
* Bullish on 2019-20 Gordon Hayward
i am convinced that hayward will be part of BOS's offer(s) for davis. whether you think thats a good thing or not for the pels may vary
Posted on 6/5/19 at 11:49 am to cgrand
quote:
i am convinced that hayward will be part of BOS's offer(s) for davis. whether you think thats a good thing or not for the pels may vary
If they take back Hill, then I think I'd be okay with it (obviously dependent on the rest of the trade).
AD
Hill
Gordon
Tatum
Brown
Posted on 6/5/19 at 11:51 am to SLafourche07
quote:
hayward
isn't he the type of player we think aaron nelson can wave some magic semen on and make him all good under the hood?
Posted on 6/5/19 at 12:15 pm to Chad504boy
you would think.
he's in recovery mode now
he's in recovery mode now
Posted on 6/5/19 at 1:24 pm to SLafourche07
quote:Something like:
If they take back Hill, then I think I'd be okay with it (obviously dependent on the rest of the trade).
AD
Hill
Gordon
Tatum
Brown
AD
Hill
Moore
for
Hayward
Tatum
Brown
Williams
#14, #20 and 2020 Memphis pick
would be fine.
This post was edited on 6/5/19 at 1:25 pm
Posted on 6/5/19 at 2:01 pm to NOSHAU
To go from zero competent 3’s in the past 7-8 years, to two stud 3’s (Hayward & Brown (2/3 plus Tatum (3/4) would be almost more than I could bear.
Insert Doc Holliday gif here.
Insert Doc Holliday gif here.
Posted on 6/5/19 at 2:13 pm to cgrand
quote:
i am convinced that hayward will be part of BOS's offer(s) for davis. whether you think thats a good thing or not for the pels may vary
Would bet anything against that happening.
Posted on 6/5/19 at 2:44 pm to Vegas Buffet
quote:You don't think Boston wants to get out from underneath that contract? Do you think Boston still in the hunt for AD?
Would bet anything against that happening.
Posted on 6/5/19 at 4:20 pm to SLafourche07
quote:
AD
Hill
Gordon
Tatum
Brown
Very nice
Posted on 6/5/19 at 4:25 pm to NOSHAU
If by taking Hayward we get all the picks, and Jaylen Brown, yes i'd be very happy with that.
Would definitely look to move Brown with picks for someone else, even though i like Brown, but we don't need all 3 of them. I know we keep throwing it around, or at least i do, going get Myles Turner, but a lineup of Jrue/Tatum/Hayward/Zion/Turner would be pretty good pretty quickly.
I'm on the side that believes Hayward will return to form.
Would definitely look to move Brown with picks for someone else, even though i like Brown, but we don't need all 3 of them. I know we keep throwing it around, or at least i do, going get Myles Turner, but a lineup of Jrue/Tatum/Hayward/Zion/Turner would be pretty good pretty quickly.
I'm on the side that believes Hayward will return to form.
Posted on 6/5/19 at 4:30 pm to TeddyPadillac
I just made a huge mistake going to the Lakers subreddit.
HOLY. shite.
What a hellhole. These people almost universally agree that they can offer less now, possibly just the #4 and one of either Lonzo or Ingram.
They all think (and this is in multiple threads) that we are desperate now and they all hold all the cards.
It is unreal.
HOLY. shite.
What a hellhole. These people almost universally agree that they can offer less now, possibly just the #4 and one of either Lonzo or Ingram.
They all think (and this is in multiple threads) that we are desperate now and they all hold all the cards.
It is unreal.
Posted on 6/5/19 at 4:35 pm to Fun Bunch
What's their rationale? Why should we be the desperate ones?
Posted on 6/5/19 at 4:37 pm to Puddinhead
There isn't one that I can discern. I guess some Lakers insiders are saying we loved their previous offer and made some terrible mistake, and now that AD still wants out, we have no choice, and no other team will put anything on the table so they are our only option.
Or...something.
Or...something.
Posted on 6/5/19 at 4:39 pm to Fun Bunch
True. We should've made the trade at the deadline. I learned in school that when negotiating, one should always limit the available business partners and ensure that there are as few bidders as possible.
Popular
Back to top


1



