- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Alternative Team Building
Posted on 3/25/13 at 2:04 pm
Posted on 3/25/13 at 2:04 pm
Rob Mahoney at SI with a long look at Denver and their title chances. Particularly relevant as the Hornets try to build around Davis with cap space in a small market and a high draft pick in a shitty lottery.
He goes on to break down the system the Nuggets use and the way they have talent that fits that system. Particularly how great they are in clutch situations.
Also a nice blurb about 2 other teams without traditional superstars.
LINK /
quote:
First and foremost is the lack of a superstar player, much less the two or three stars traditionally considered requisite for contention
quote:
Yet most of what a superstar provides for a contender can be boiled down to an economy of function. It’s convenient to have a vast collection of those necessary skills and attributes distilled into one player, but a superstar is only as necessary as those underlying qualities afforded. Typically, chief among those traits is the capacity to create efficient offense
He goes on to break down the system the Nuggets use and the way they have talent that fits that system. Particularly how great they are in clutch situations.
Also a nice blurb about 2 other teams without traditional superstars.
quote:
Also implicated in the discussion of whether NBA teams need superstars are the Pacers and Grizzlies, two of the best examples of how sound a lineup can be without a single transcendent talent. Both franchises have gone about constructing more balanced lineups as a means of accounting for the lack of a dominant player, but as a result Memphis and Indiana boast the two most effective high-usage lineups this season
LINK /
Posted on 3/25/13 at 2:34 pm to corndeaux
They describe Denver like a soccer team in ways.
Get it close as possible, dribble hand offs,off ball cuts and shots from close. Not to mention a frantic pace.
Oh yeah and half their home games are at altitude.
I'll take their success no question.
Get it close as possible, dribble hand offs,off ball cuts and shots from close. Not to mention a frantic pace.
Oh yeah and half their home games are at altitude.
I'll take their success no question.
Posted on 3/25/13 at 3:10 pm to corndeaux
I love Denver's team...a "big 3" is not necessary.
...hope they make some noise in the playoffs
...hope they make some noise in the playoffs
Posted on 3/25/13 at 3:41 pm to corndeaux
There were a few articles like this back in '04 when the Pistons won their title without a true superstar and whether Joe Dumars formed a new mold for success. No one else really pulled that off, but the Pistons had a nice five year run or so.
Posted on 3/25/13 at 4:34 pm to Bunk Moreland
Chicago started massing talent like that, then they found their "superstar".
The Pacers are kind of like that too. But they have a dominant big man in an NBA that lacks dominant big men.
The Pacers are kind of like that too. But they have a dominant big man in an NBA that lacks dominant big men.
Posted on 3/25/13 at 4:51 pm to corndeaux
The "superstar" label is so dumb. All of those teams have players whose numbers rival the best players at their position. Whether they are considered superstars or not means little when the game is being played.
Either way, the Nuggets have loads of talent. They basically built their team by turning Melo into 5 contributing players.
Posted on 3/25/13 at 5:05 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
They basically built their team by turning Melo into 5 contributing players.
True, but Dolan seems about due to overpay for somebody... get to work, Dell.
Posted on 3/25/13 at 5:25 pm to JohnZeroQ
quote:
Oh yeah and half their home games are at altitude.
Where do they play the other half of their home games?
Posted on 3/25/13 at 5:28 pm to GynoSandberg
The label is dumb, but more because there are only a handful of true franchise players that bring the all around skills Mahoney is talking about and can anchor any team. Everyone else needs help and context.
The thing that worries me is that I'm still not sure, after three years, what Monty/Dell philosophically believe is the best way to build a team.
The thing that worries me is that I'm still not sure, after three years, what Monty/Dell philosophically believe is the best way to build a team.
Posted on 3/25/13 at 5:30 pm to corndeaux
obviously this summer will tell us a great deal about what they believe
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News