Started By
Message

re: Snoke to return in Star Wars 9??

Posted on 1/2/18 at 6:48 pm to
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
98715 posts
Posted on 1/2/18 at 6:48 pm to
quote:

Snoke was sliced right through through his digestive organs.


The ability to destroy one’s digestive organs is insignificant next to the power of the Force.
Posted by KingSlayer
Member since May 2015
2854 posts
Posted on 1/2/18 at 7:07 pm to
quote:

Darth Maul reappeared in the Clone Wars series, and the Clone Wars are considered canon in the Star Wars Universe.


Darth Maul also appeared in Star Wars Rebels which is also canon.




This post was edited on 1/2/18 at 7:08 pm
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76169 posts
Posted on 1/2/18 at 9:46 pm to
Maul amd Snoke were both cut right in half. Shouldn’t be able to walk off those wounds.
Posted by TIGERSTORM
parts unknown
Member since Feb 2009
4505 posts
Posted on 1/2/18 at 9:47 pm to
quote:

haven't seen the latest star wars and i'm already tired of it. Episode 7 was the same story line as episode 4. The one about the death star, is such garbage. They created a movie simply to explain away a plot hole from the original 3 movies. And i hear the latest movie isn't some gem


And here's the problem; people bitch about TFA being a retread of ANH but TLJ tells a new story and everyone is like "frick this movie".
Posted by lsufan9193969700
3 miles from B.R.
Member since Sep 2003
55105 posts
Posted on 1/2/18 at 9:51 pm to
quote:


I haven't seen the latest star wars and i'm already tired of it. Episode 7 was the same story line as episode 4. The one about the death star, is such garbage. They created a movie simply to explain away a plot hole from the original 3 movies. And i hear the latest movie isn't some gem. Disney needs to pull the plug on star wars and kill the franchise before they further alienate fans and viewers.




Shut up.
Posted by Tigerstark
Parts unknown
Member since Aug 2011
5973 posts
Posted on 1/3/18 at 8:04 am to
quote:

tells a new story


Does it tell a new story or does it dump a steaming pile of walrus milk/jizz on itself?

Tell a unique story in a good, competent way, and you wouldn't see nearly the problems. The incompetence is the big problem here, not whether the story was new or not.
Posted by monkeybutt
Member since Oct 2015
4583 posts
Posted on 1/3/18 at 8:25 am to
quote:

And here's the problem; people bitch about TFA being a retread of ANH but TLJ tells a new story and everyone is like "frick this movie".




You don't think any of that has to do with this new story sucking? You think people would say "frick this movie" if it told a good new story? Honestly, what kind of arguments are you TLJ defenders stooping to?
Posted by Suntiger
BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
32856 posts
Posted on 1/3/18 at 10:11 am to
New stories should be new movies. Valkyrie was a new movie/story. Star Wars is a sexual and has a history and sets up certain expectations. This story was a light rehash with zero plot or character development. As a matter of fact, it negates any character development from the first movie.
Posted by StrongBackWeakMind
Member since May 2014
22650 posts
Posted on 1/3/18 at 10:14 am to
quote:

TLJ tells a new story and everyone is like "frick this movie"
Because it sucked.
Posted by J Murdah
Member since Jun 2008
39777 posts
Posted on 1/3/18 at 11:11 am to
quote:

But, if you are Maul or Snoke and get cut in half, then dead.
Maul did not die there.
Posted by J Murdah
Member since Jun 2008
39777 posts
Posted on 1/3/18 at 11:13 am to
quote:

Darth Maul coming back to life was lame.
I disagree, his story arc provided some really cool insight into Death Watch and the Mandalorians, gave us the dark sabre and Savage. He also played an important role for the Rebels too.
Posted by monkeybutt
Member since Oct 2015
4583 posts
Posted on 1/3/18 at 11:16 am to
quote:

Star Wars is a sexual


Go on.....

quote:

has a history and sets up certain expectations. This story was a light rehash with zero plot or character development. As a matter of fact, it negates any character development from the first movie.



Posted by Walking the Earth
Member since Feb 2013
17260 posts
Posted on 1/3/18 at 11:18 am to
quote:

but TLJ tells a new story


Did it?
This post was edited on 1/3/18 at 11:22 am
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 1/3/18 at 11:29 am to
quote:

TLJ tells a new story
.
It did?

Exactly what story did it tell?


Can you lay out the plot? Is there a buildup, conflict, climax, and resolution?

Did any characters undergoe significant growth or development based on struggles related to the plot?

Nothing of consequence happened in that movie and the end of the movie every main character is in the exact same state as they were when it started both personality and story wise.

This post was edited on 1/3/18 at 11:31 am
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram