Started By
Message

Mary Poppins Returns Official Trailer

Posted on 9/17/18 at 9:15 am
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
84943 posts
Posted on 9/17/18 at 9:15 am
Posted by emanresu
Member since Dec 2009
9355 posts
Posted on 9/17/18 at 9:26 am to
Would totally go see that alone and not be embarrassed.
Posted by Erin Go Bragh
Beyond the Pale
Member since Dec 2007
14916 posts
Posted on 9/17/18 at 9:33 am to
Would be worth it just to see 93-year-old Dick Van Dyke hoofing it.
Posted by Dawgirl
Member since Oct 2015
6132 posts
Posted on 9/17/18 at 9:35 am to
Why do these people continue to remake movies that do not need to be remade? The original was perfect in every way and no one, NO ONE, will ever out perform Julie Andrews in this part. I have no desire to see the remake/reboot but if the theaters decide to show the original again, even in my 40s, I would not hesitate to go see it with no shame!!!
This post was edited on 9/17/18 at 9:37 am
Posted by TigerCub
Team Boxtard
Member since May 2006
20173 posts
Posted on 9/17/18 at 9:38 am to
This looks great. I can't wait to go see it.
Posted by TigerCub
Team Boxtard
Member since May 2006
20173 posts
Posted on 9/17/18 at 9:39 am to
quote:

Why do these people continue to remake movies that do not need to be remade? The original was perfect in every way and no one, NO ONE, will ever out perform Julie Andrews in this part. I have no desire to see the remake/reboot but if the theaters decide to show the original again, even in my 40s, I would not hesitate to go see it with no shame!!!


It's a sequel, not a remake.
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
36008 posts
Posted on 9/17/18 at 9:39 am to
quote:

Would be worth it just to see 93-year-old Dick Van Dyke hoofing it.


This.

Standing O for DVD.
Posted by Lugnut
Wesson
Member since Nov 2016
1441 posts
Posted on 9/17/18 at 9:43 am to
I’m in!
Posted by hsfolk
Member since Sep 2009
18537 posts
Posted on 9/17/18 at 9:45 am to
surprisingly that actually looks pretty good
Posted by TheTideMustRoll
Birmingham, AL
Member since Dec 2009
8906 posts
Posted on 9/17/18 at 9:47 am to
I don't want to be excited for this, because Disney these days is the devil and it just speaks to the lack of any new ideas coming out of the entertainment industry.





...but goddamn it, I'm excited. Mary Poppins is one of my favorite kids' movies. I'm sure this new one will be the usual Disney communist propaganda piece and I'll hate it when its over, but I'll definitely be seeing it. Damn you, Mouse! Daaaaaamn yooooooooouuuuuuuuuu!!!
Posted by VinegarStrokes
Georgia
Member since Oct 2015
13285 posts
Posted on 9/17/18 at 9:48 am to
quote:

Why do these people continue to remake movies that do not need to be remade? The original was perfect in every way and no one, NO ONE, will ever out perform Julie Andrews in this part. I have no desire to see the remake/reboot but if the theaters decide to show the original again, even in my 40s, I would not hesitate to go see it with no shame!!!


lol...idiot.

it's a sequel. you do realize that there were several books written in the series...don't you?
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51235 posts
Posted on 9/17/18 at 10:08 am to
Trailer looks good.

I liked how they CGI'd Dick Van Dyke's head onto the dancing body.
Posted by hsfolk
Member since Sep 2009
18537 posts
Posted on 9/17/18 at 10:10 am to
I can't believe Angela Lansbury is still alive
Posted by Bham4Tide
In a Van down by the River
Member since Feb 2011
22083 posts
Posted on 9/17/18 at 10:14 am to
That . . . Looks great
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
36008 posts
Posted on 9/17/18 at 10:19 am to
quote:

I liked how they CGI'd Dick Van Dyke's head onto the dancing body.


Not sure that's CGI. The guy is in his 90's and still dancing some.
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35437 posts
Posted on 9/17/18 at 10:58 am to
quote:

Why do these people continue to remake movies that do not need to be remade? The original was perfect in every way and no one, NO ONE, will ever out perform Julie Andrews in this part


Sing it brother!



No sequels, no remakes - leave certain movies alone - by themselves...bad sequels, bad remakes sully the stand alone - and it should be stand alone - that's it - leave it alone.
This post was edited on 9/17/18 at 11:01 am
Posted by Emteein
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2011
3886 posts
Posted on 9/17/18 at 11:02 am to
This needs to stop, I'm not for sequels to movies that don't require a continuation of the story. Especially if the main character is as iconic as Mary Poppins, and further more Julie Andrews is the only Mary Poppins. Her voice is synonymous with the character. If Disney were to do a follow up it should have been done when Andrews could do it.
Posted by hsfolk
Member since Sep 2009
18537 posts
Posted on 9/17/18 at 11:02 am to
Mary Poppins was a horrible nanny. If that was real life they'd call child services on her
Posted by meeple
Carcassonne
Member since May 2011
9337 posts
Posted on 9/17/18 at 11:07 am to
They’re releasing the title of SW Episode IX early.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51235 posts
Posted on 9/17/18 at 11:10 am to
quote:

If Disney were to do a follow up it should have been done when Andrews could do it.


Julie Andrews is old af and has only done a few live-action films this century.

I think Disney went the right route with re-casting the role.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram