Started By
Message
locked post

Worst ESPN.com article ever

Posted on 6/10/13 at 7:35 pm
Posted by boXerrumble
Member since Sep 2011
54364 posts
Posted on 6/10/13 at 7:35 pm
quote:

The New England Patriots are set to take a step back offensively in 2013. They lost both starting receivers – Wes Welker and Brandon Lloyd -- from last year’s group that led the NFL in scoring and replaced them with mostly unproven players and rookies.

New England also has huge question marks at tight end. Rob Gronkowski has had five surgeries on his arm and back since last November and may not be fully recovered for Week 1, and fellow tight end Aaron Hernandez also had major shoulder surgery and missed six games last season.

The Patriots signing quarterback Tim Tebow off the scrap heap isn't the answer to New England’s offensive woes. If anything, it shows an unexpected sign of desperation for a New England offense searching for answers.

This is yet another sign that New England’s run of Super Bowl appearances and NFL dominance is coming to an end. Future Hall of Fame quarterback Tom Brady and Belichick have made it to five Super Bowls -- winning three. But it looks more and more like last year may have been the Belichick/Brady era Patriots’ final shot to win a fourth championship when they lost at home to the Baltimore Ravens in the AFC title game.

To put it bluntly, New England simply is not good enough to win a Super Bowl this year. Last year’s team was better, especially on offense. Brady, who will be 36 in August, is a year older and has less firepower. Adding Tebow to the mix doesn’t fix anything. It simply brings more media and a huge distraction, which is something Belichick usually tries to avoid.

And what exactly is Tebow’s role in New England?

Tebow is certainly not playing quarterback. Brady is clearly the franchise starter in New England, and I would take my chances with the strong arm of Ryan Mallett over the inaccurate and poor mechanics of Tebow any day. Tebow is the No. 3 quarterback at best.

Would the Patriots really take Brady off the field to insert Tebow in a Wildcat package? Taking an elite quarterback like Brady off the field for any amount of plays is a huge mistake. Opposing defenses would love to see less Brady and more Tebow on a weekly basis. Would the Patriots be silly enough to oblige?

Maybe Tebow can play H-back or on special teams in New England. But that is nothing more than what he did with the New York Jets last year when things went awry. Is all of that worth the extra attention that Tebow brings? The Jets got their answer last year. Now, it's New England's turn to make the same mistake.

I do not see how adding Tebow makes the Patriots a better team. This is a franchise which prides itself on competing for championships. But New England took yet another step backward on Monday.


LINK

I the entire time while reading.
This post was edited on 6/10/13 at 7:35 pm
Posted by Fearthehat0307
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2007
65256 posts
Posted on 6/10/13 at 7:35 pm to
didn't read but i'm guessing it says tebow staaaaaaaaaaaacked league fuuuuuuuuuuuuuucked
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
87635 posts
Posted on 6/10/13 at 7:38 pm to
Hodge?
Posted by 1ranter1
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2008
10906 posts
Posted on 6/10/13 at 7:51 pm to
quote:

Worst ESPN.com article ever


They lost Welker, Lloyd and Gronk is a huge question mark as of now. Tebow will likely do nothing to help them win games.

What exactly about the article is wrong?
Posted by Fearthehat0307
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2007
65256 posts
Posted on 6/10/13 at 7:52 pm to
quote:

Tebow will likely do nothing to help them win games.
bookmarked
Posted by Moneyball
Member since May 2013
804 posts
Posted on 6/10/13 at 7:52 pm to
Terrible thread title
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
69111 posts
Posted on 6/10/13 at 7:55 pm to
Thanks for cutting and pasting the entire article so we don't have to click the link to not read it.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
116206 posts
Posted on 6/10/13 at 7:57 pm to
quote:

They lost Welker, Lloyd and Gronk is a huge question mark as of now. Tebow will likely do nothing to help them win games.


Well the connection between Tebow and trying to help the offense is wrong.

And the insinuation that the Pats will struggle to score points this season.

And that the Tebow move is out of desperation.

quote:

To put it bluntly, New England simply is not good enough to win a Super Bowl this year.


And this
This post was edited on 6/10/13 at 7:59 pm
Posted by Moneyball
Member since May 2013
804 posts
Posted on 6/10/13 at 7:58 pm to
It should be edited. More than 3-4 paragraphs is frowned upon.

Expect a fine from Chicken...
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
116206 posts
Posted on 6/10/13 at 7:59 pm to
quote:

fellow tight end Aaron Hernandez also had major shoulder surgery and missed six games last season.


OMG THIS HAS TO BE AN ONION ARTICLE
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
37575 posts
Posted on 6/10/13 at 8:00 pm to
quote:

Tebow will likely do nothing to help them win games.



another person who doubts the power of prayer
Posted by Sanchito
Member since Apr 2012
995 posts
Posted on 6/10/13 at 8:01 pm to
quote:

They lost Welker, Lloyd and Gronk is a huge question mark as of now.
So the offseason additions, the fact that they have now established a good running game, and arguably the best offensive line in the league will not allow the Patriots to put up offensive number similar to last year?
Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
43843 posts
Posted on 6/10/13 at 8:02 pm to
quote:

Worst ESPN.com article ever?
Anything by that bitch Jemelle.
Posted by Moneyball
Member since May 2013
804 posts
Posted on 6/10/13 at 8:03 pm to
I like James Walker...
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
116206 posts
Posted on 6/10/13 at 8:04 pm to
James Walker is a joke from what little ive seen.

Any time the Pats lose a divional game OMG THE PATS ARE BEING UNSEATED!!!
This post was edited on 6/10/13 at 8:04 pm
Posted by T1gerWonder
Member since May 2011
4463 posts
Posted on 6/10/13 at 8:05 pm to
quote:

Worst ESPN.com article ever


When some guy try to convince the hornets that they should choose MKG over Davis. He wrote it right after the hornets won the lottery. I still laugh while thinking about it
Posted by Fearthehat0307
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2007
65256 posts
Posted on 6/10/13 at 8:06 pm to
quote:

Anything by that bitch Jemelle.
that's racist
Posted by Fearthehat0307
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2007
65256 posts
Posted on 6/10/13 at 8:06 pm to
quote:

When some guy try to convince the hornets that they should choose MKG over Davis. He wrote it right after the hornets won the lottery. I still laugh while thinking about it
had to be a troll
Posted by BarbeTiger
Mr. White's Lab Yo
Member since Jan 2012
6180 posts
Posted on 6/10/13 at 8:06 pm to
I was reading the article and thinking "this all sounds right to me". Then I realized the OP was a Florida fan then it all made sense
Posted by 1ranter1
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2008
10906 posts
Posted on 6/10/13 at 8:07 pm to
quote:

To put it bluntly, New England simply is not good enough to win a Super Bowl this year.


Missed this part.

But still the article is basically saying the Pats don't have the weapons they had last season (at least on paper) and Tebow won't be giving them another weapon.

The desperation part and the quote above are pretty bad, but worst article ever? Far from it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram