- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What if Joe Montana had gone against the Cowboys instead of Steve Young during the rivalry
Posted on 3/4/21 at 6:07 pm
Posted on 3/4/21 at 6:07 pm
92
93
94
Would the results have been the same or not?
93
94
Would the results have been the same or not?
Posted on 3/4/21 at 6:14 pm to Tarik One
The 49ers gave up 30 points and over 400 yards to the Cowboys in the '92 NFC Championship Game and allowed 38 points in the '93 NFC Championship Game. I don't see how a change in QB would have altered the results of those games.
Posted on 3/4/21 at 6:15 pm to Tarik One
Prime Montana or KC Montana?
Posted on 3/4/21 at 6:18 pm to Tarik One
Nobody was coming close to beating America’s team
Posted on 3/4/21 at 6:22 pm to Tarik One
This is a dumb question. Steve young was the mvp in 1992.
In 94, he won the mvp again and they won the super bowl. His 94 season is arguably the gold standard for a qb, outside the last 15 years or so when the entire league went insane with the passing stats.
Swapping in Montana would do nothing. You could argue peak young is better than peak Montana.
In 94, he won the mvp again and they won the super bowl. His 94 season is arguably the gold standard for a qb, outside the last 15 years or so when the entire league went insane with the passing stats.
Swapping in Montana would do nothing. You could argue peak young is better than peak Montana.
Posted on 3/4/21 at 6:27 pm to 632627
quote:
You could argue peak young is better than peak Montana
Lol no
Posted on 3/4/21 at 6:28 pm to Bench McElroy
quote:
The 49ers gave up 30 points and over 400 yards to the Cowboys in the '92 NFC Championship Game
The Cowboys had 1 yard more than the 49ers, both had 24 first downs. It was a 4 point game heading into the 4th quarter.
The difference was the 49ers had 4 turnovers, Young was responsible for a few of them.
Posted on 3/4/21 at 7:11 pm to NorthshoreTiger76
quote:
You could argue peak young is better than peak Montana
Lol no
The stats on paper are better for Young, but the game is played on the field
Posted on 3/4/21 at 11:17 pm to Tarik One
quote:
What if Joe Montana had gone against the Cowboys instead of Steve Young during the rivalry
Depends on Joe's health and level of play at the time, he enters those games playing at an elite level and continues that, they win (see 88 and 89 playoffs), he enters those games at a weak level (see 85 and 86 playoffs) they lose and probably get embarrassed then there's the aberration of the 87 divisional game against the Vikings where he stunk up the joint, 87 49ers one of the all-time great teams not to win the Super Bowl
Posted on 3/4/21 at 11:40 pm to 632627
quote:
You could argue peak young is better than peak Montana.
Thennnnn why only one Super Bowl win as starter?? Not like Young played with bums when he peaked
Posted on 3/5/21 at 12:13 am to ThePTExperience1969
92 is one of best teams of all time.
No. If Walsh was there maybe
No. If Walsh was there maybe
Posted on 3/5/21 at 12:49 am to Statsattack
Nobody is beating the '92 Cowboys.
Plus, if you watch the America's Game doc on the 1988 Niners, Walsh had worn out his welcome in the locker room and the 1989 season was to show they could win it without him per the player's words.
And they went gangbusters.
The real debate is whether Young did less with more or Montana did more with less.
Young had some loaded teams but standing in his way was one of the best dynasties of all-time.
Plus, if you watch the America's Game doc on the 1988 Niners, Walsh had worn out his welcome in the locker room and the 1989 season was to show they could win it without him per the player's words.
And they went gangbusters.
The real debate is whether Young did less with more or Montana did more with less.
Young had some loaded teams but standing in his way was one of the best dynasties of all-time.
This post was edited on 3/5/21 at 12:50 am
Posted on 3/5/21 at 2:19 am to Tarik One
Results would have been the same. They were both system QBs.
Posted on 3/5/21 at 4:30 am to Dawgwithnoname
Well we should all aspire to be a system qb. Dumb name anyway
Posted on 3/5/21 at 5:22 am to Tarik One
Are you putting Montana on the Cowboys D? Because that's the only way you make a difference in this game.
Posted on 3/5/21 at 6:54 am to Tarik One
Niners would have went 0-3. Montana was at the very end of his career. And he didn't have Brady's "nutritionist".
Posted on 3/5/21 at 7:02 am to Cannon
quote:are Brady haters now gonna start saying Brady’s on the juice?
Brady's "nutritionist".
Posted on 3/5/21 at 7:30 am to TigerintheNO
quote:
The difference was the 49ers had 4 turnovers, Young was responsible for a few of them.
The Cowboys scored zero points off those two Young turnovers, one of which came at the end of the game when the 49ers were down by 10 points and in desperation mode. If Young didn’t commit any turnovers, it still wouldn’t have changed the result of the game. Let me give you a stat about Montana and Young that might open your eyes. Young started 13 postseason games for the 49ers. The 49ers allowed more than 24 points in six of those games. Montana started in 23 career postseason games. His defenses allowed more than 24 points in only five of those 23 games.
Posted on 3/5/21 at 8:49 am to 632627
quote:
You could argue peak young is better than peak Montana
What idiot would argue that?
Posted on 3/5/21 at 11:43 am to Bench McElroy
quote:
Young started 13 postseason games for the 49ers. The 49ers allowed more than 24 points in six of those games. Montana started in 23 career postseason games. His defenses allowed more than 24 points in only five of those 23 games.
Stats lie as usual.
Giving up 24 points between 1980-1988 is way worse than giving up 24 points between 1990-1994.
That stat doesn't remotely prove that Montana had better defenses in the playoffs than Young. You basically stunk in the 90's if you didn't score 24 points...not so for the early to mid-80's.
This post was edited on 3/5/21 at 11:46 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News