- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Spiking the ball
Posted on 11/16/17 at 9:25 pm
Posted on 11/16/17 at 9:25 pm
Why is this not intentional grounding? It is not “in the vacinity” of an eligible receiver nor is it past the line of scrimmage. The line of scrimmage is not adjusted to the play.
Are there special surcumstances within 2 minuets?
It seems to me an unfair advantage to the offense.
Are there special surcumstances within 2 minuets?
It seems to me an unfair advantage to the offense.
Posted on 11/16/17 at 9:26 pm to Wedge
It's an exception to the rule.
Posted on 11/16/17 at 9:27 pm to wildtigercat93
Because you are sacrificing a down in-exchange for stopping the clock
Posted on 11/16/17 at 9:29 pm to wildtigercat93
quote:
It's an exception to the rule.
What he said.
ETA -
quote:
Item 3: Stopping Clock A player under center is permitted to stop the game clock legally to save time if, immediately upon receiving the snap, he begins a continuous throwing motion and throws the ball directly into the ground.
If you take a step or two back and then spike it, it's intentional grounding with a 10 second runoff. It's ended games before.
This post was edited on 11/16/17 at 9:31 pm
Posted on 11/16/17 at 9:29 pm to Wedge
I believe it’s an exception to the rule and doesn’t make logical sense based on the established rules.
Posted on 11/16/17 at 9:31 pm to Bamafan24
So because you don’t try you are not penalized the yardage?
How is this different than a QB in the grasp chucking the ball away (and failing to cross the LOS) to avoid a sack?
How is this different than a QB in the grasp chucking the ball away (and failing to cross the LOS) to avoid a sack?
Posted on 11/16/17 at 9:32 pm to Wedge
If it is intentional grounding, what would they lose a yard? Isn’t it spot if the foul?
Posted on 11/16/17 at 9:32 pm to Wedge
YEAH AND HOW COME THE HOLDER ISNT CALLED DOWN ON FIELD GOAL ATTEMPTS?????
Posted on 11/16/17 at 9:32 pm to TheWalrus
It's 10 yards from the spot
Posted on 11/16/17 at 9:33 pm to wildtigercat93
Oh it’s spot foul if it’s more than ten yards
Posted on 11/16/17 at 9:34 pm to PrimeTime Money
I guess I can wrap my head around it not making any logical sense.
It seems counterintuitive to the rules between the 2:00 warnings of each half.
It seems counterintuitive to the rules between the 2:00 warnings of each half.
Posted on 11/16/17 at 9:35 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
YEAH AND HOW COME THE HOLDER ISNT CALLED DOWN ON FIELD GOAL ATTEMPTS?????
Ooooh, that's a good one.
Posted on 11/16/17 at 9:36 pm to Wedge
quote:
Why is this not intentional grounding?
Why is 10 yards a first down?
Posted on 11/16/17 at 9:40 pm to moneyg
quote:
Why is 10 yards a first down?
I think relevance escapes your grasp
Posted on 11/16/17 at 9:43 pm to WG_Dawg
Only relevant in college ball.
Your bridge misses you.
Your bridge misses you.
Posted on 11/16/17 at 9:44 pm to Wedge
Um the difference is that he's not trying to avoid the loss of yardage that comes with an imminent sack. I don't understand what's so confusing about this being allowed.
Posted on 11/16/17 at 9:49 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
YEAH AND HOW COME THE HOLDER ISNT CALLED DOWN ON FIELD GOAL ATTEMPTS?????
Watched an Ohio high school playoff game end on a fake field goal attempt because the holder didn't lift his knee before tossing the ball. They would of scored too
Posted on 11/16/17 at 9:53 pm to Wedge
Same reason why kneeling the ball in the pros lets you forfeit the down without being touched
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News