- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Saints vs. Seahawks
Posted on 1/6/14 at 3:41 pm to CocoLoco
Posted on 1/6/14 at 3:41 pm to CocoLoco
quote:
1) It's incredibly difficult to beat the Saints twice.
Meh
quote:
2) Sean Payton is showing he wants to run the ball, finally. The Saints, with a rushing attack, is damn near impossible to stop. The Seahawks are obviously a much better team than the Eagles, but I think the Saints will move the ball well if they stick to the run.
Meh again, the Hawks have the best secondary in the league. They'll man up NOLA's receivers the same way they did in the first game. They won't have to take desperate tactics like Philly did basically daring NOLA to run:
quote:
Eagles DC Billy Davis confirmed his game plan in Saturday's loss to the Saints centered around stopping the pass.
Even though Drew Brees was struggling to throw the ball effectively in sub-freezing temperatures, the Eagles used five- and six-man boxes for virtually the entire game.
This post was edited on 1/6/14 at 3:42 pm
3
Posted on 1/6/14 at 3:52 pm to TulaneTigerFan
quote:
Meh again, the Hawks have the best secondary in the league. They'll man up NOLA's receivers the same way they did in the first game. They won't have to take desperate tactics like Philly did basically daring NOLA to run:
No daring, we are running regardless.
Posted on 1/6/14 at 3:54 pm to Kcarp
seahawks by 14
Posted on 1/6/14 at 3:58 pm to TulaneTigerFan
TulaneTigerFan you think this game is going to be a rerun? I'm not saying we win, however this game will be closer than you think. Playoffs dog!
Posted on 1/6/14 at 4:20 pm to Kcarp
I don't think there is any way Pete Carroll embarrasses Sean Payton again. I'm not a saints fan, but I just don't see it happening. The game will be close.
Posted on 1/6/14 at 4:23 pm to tigerpimpbot
quote:I'm glad no one is giving the Saints a chance. Just like last week, all the so called experts were all on Philly's nuts!
I don't think there is any way Pete Carroll embarrasses Sean Payton again. I'm not a saints fan, but I just don't see it happening. The game will be close.
Posted on 1/6/14 at 4:26 pm to Kcarp
I think the Hawks start off too slow in the first half and turn the ball over a couple of times. Then by the 4th rolls around they make a come back but it's too late
30-27 Saints
30-27 Saints
Posted on 1/6/14 at 4:27 pm to Kcarp
Nah, I think it'll be closer this time around. I still think the Hawks win though. Just pointing out that expecting to run on Seattle because the Saints were able to run on 5 man boxes against Philly isn't really logical.
eta: Seattle just matches up really well with NOLA IMHO. Might be the worst matchup in the L for the Saints
eta: Seattle just matches up really well with NOLA IMHO. Might be the worst matchup in the L for the Saints
This post was edited on 1/6/14 at 4:28 pm
Posted on 1/6/14 at 4:47 pm to TulaneTigerFan
quote:
eta: Seattle just matches up really well with NOLA IMHO
I agree here.....
Posted on 1/6/14 at 4:50 pm to TulaneTigerFan
quote:
Just pointing out that expecting to run on Seattle because the Saints were able to run on 5 man boxes against Philly isn't really logical.
No one is expecting to run up and down the field on them. But the saints can run on them. It's just a matter of being committed to the run and not asking the oline to run block 1 out of 6 plays.
And it wasn't 5 man boxes against Philly. We got the ball back with almost 5 minutes left in the game and ran it right down their throat against loaded boxes to seal the game.
I think I'd die of a heart attack if you ever gave the saints credit for anything.
This post was edited on 1/6/14 at 4:51 pm
Posted on 1/6/14 at 4:54 pm to motorbreath
The problem is the NO defense. With 4 or 5 injuries in the secondary, I just don't see them slowing down Seattle enough to give Drew and Co. a chance. The last game was over in the first half, and Wilson still threw for over 300 yards with 3 touchdowns and zero interceptions.
Basically, I just can't see the Saint's offense keeping up with Seattle's offense given the two defenses.
Basically, I just can't see the Saint's offense keeping up with Seattle's offense given the two defenses.
Posted on 1/6/14 at 5:00 pm to motorbreath
quote:
I think I'd die of a heart attack if you ever gave the saints credit for anything.
edit: That's why he is not on Saints talk, talking shite!
This post was edited on 1/6/14 at 5:02 pm
Posted on 1/6/14 at 5:02 pm to Kcarp
Saints Thirty-one
Seahawks sixteen
Seahawks sixteen
Posted on 1/6/14 at 5:07 pm to Archie Bengal Bunker
quote:How do you come to this conclusion?
The problem is the NO defense. With 4 or 5 injuries in the secondary, I just don't see them slowing down Seattle enough to give Drew and Co. a chance. The last game was over in the first half, and Wilson still threw for over 300 yards with 3 touchdowns and zero interceptions.
Basically, I just can't see the Saint's offense keeping up with Seattle's offense given the two defenses.
This post was edited on 1/6/14 at 5:09 pm
Posted on 1/6/14 at 5:09 pm to Kcarp
Mental retardation
Posted on 1/6/14 at 5:10 pm to TulaneTigerFan
TulaneTigerFan, Could you break down how the Cardinals beat you guys a few weeks ago at home?
Posted on 1/6/14 at 5:13 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
Saints Thirty-one Seahawks sixteen
I would LOVE THIS.... BUT.......... I would look at more of Seattle 31 and N.O. 16.......
Posted on 1/6/14 at 5:17 pm to JS87
it's so weird seeing all these saints fains talking about how they're going to show up and punch the Hawks in the mouth, and run run run when 3 weeks ago they were saying how shitty Ingram and running game are.
Hawks 28
Saints 17
Hawks 28
Saints 17
Posted on 1/6/14 at 5:19 pm to dukke v
quote:
dukke v
I would LOVE THIS.... BUT.......... I would look at more of Seattle 31 and N.O. 16.......
That's exactly what i wanted to see
Posted on 1/6/14 at 5:28 pm to BenDover
quote:Could you link me to that post?
it's so weird seeing all these saints fains talking about how they're going to show up and punch the Hawks in the mouth, and run run run when 3 weeks ago they were saying how shitty Ingram and running game are.
Page 8 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News