Started By
Message

Roger Goodell Responds to Louisiana Governor

Posted on 2/11/19 at 3:48 pm
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
51427 posts
Posted on 2/11/19 at 3:48 pm
quote:

In his reply, Goodell reiterated his belief that he cannot invoke Rule 17, Section 2, Article 1 “to overturn the result of a game because of an officiating error.” He added that he believes “it would be wrong for me to do so.”

The commissioner also sounds opposed to making interference calls a part of replay. He does, however, agree the league needs to figure out how to improve its officiating.

“I fully understand your personal disappointment, and the disappointment and frustration of Saints fans throughout the country, over the outcome of the NFC Championship Game,” Goodell wrote in his letter to the Louisiana Governor, via The Advocate. “As you know, immediately following the game, our head of officiating told Coach Payton that a penalty should have been called on the play in question. I have expressed the same view to both Mrs. Benson and Coach Payton, as well as during my press conference on January 30.

“Our rules do not permit the Commissioner to overturn the result of a game because of an officiating error, and I believe that it would be wrong for me to do so. Nor have the clubs supported an expansion of replay to review decisions by game officials to call — or not to call — a penalty on the field. That said, I agree that it is incumbent on us to review this issue closely to determine if there are changes in our rules or procedures that would prevent a similar occurrence in the future. While there will always be mistakes in any game played, coached, and officiated by humans, we do not want officiating to be the topic of discussion after any game.”



LINK
Posted by Hester Carries
Member since Sep 2012
22391 posts
Posted on 2/11/19 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

ur rules do not permit the Commissioner to overturn the result of a game because of an officiating error, and I believe that it would be wrong for me to do so. Nor have the clubs supported an expansion of replay to review decisions by game officials to call — or not to call — a penalty on the field.


Im a Saints fan that wanted to literally kill myself after that game.

But this is fact.
Posted by 225bred
COYS
Member since Jun 2011
20386 posts
Posted on 2/11/19 at 3:53 pm to
Goodell vs JBE

Is this real life?
Posted by rondo
Worst. Poster. Evar.
Member since Jan 2004
77405 posts
Posted on 2/11/19 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

Roger Goodell



frick him...piece of human garbage
Posted by TechDawg2007
Bawville
Member since Nov 2007
32249 posts
Posted on 2/11/19 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

overturn the result of a game because of an officiating error.
This was not an "officiating error". This missed call was blatant.
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
78893 posts
Posted on 2/11/19 at 3:56 pm to
For not intervening sooner and for not making a statement for 10 days or whatever, he should've been let go with his golden parachute.
Posted by StealthCalais11
Lurker since 2007
Member since Aug 2011
12447 posts
Posted on 2/11/19 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

we do not want officiating to be the topic of discussion after any game.”

Then Simple solution - hire competent individuals for year-round employment status & fire them if they frick up.
Posted by ThePTExperience1969
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Apr 2016
13360 posts
Posted on 2/11/19 at 3:59 pm to
The LAST thing the sport of FOOTBALL needs is MORE IMPERFECT HUMAN INVOLVEMENT in an ALREADY IMPERFECT SPORT to the point where it sets transformative precedents that irreparably hurt the unpredictability and excitement of sports in general and exacerbate and compound mistakes made incident to ostensibly impartial 3rd party human oversight
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35437 posts
Posted on 2/11/19 at 4:01 pm to
For frick sake, let this thing die.

Has any Pro game ever been overturned in history over bad officiating?

Are we going to play SB Part II - this time with the Pats and Saints in June?

I don't understand what the Governer was hoping to gain by this stunt?

This is the NCAA...is he trying to vacate wins now?
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171035 posts
Posted on 2/11/19 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

For frick sake, let this thing die.
quote:


I don't understand what the Governer was hoping to gain by this stunt?


The governor did this weeks ago, 2 days after the game. The commissioner is the one who won't "let this die."
This post was edited on 2/11/19 at 4:05 pm
Posted by Eighteen
Member since Dec 2006
33850 posts
Posted on 2/11/19 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

For frick sake, let this thing die.

Has any Pro game ever been overturned in history over bad officiating?

Are we going to play SB Part II - this time with the Pats and Saints in June?

I don't understand what the Governer was hoping to gain by this stunt?

This is the NCAA...is he trying to vacate wins now?


I agree. Why the frick didnt Goodell or the league release this statement the day after the game?

Two days after?
Three days after?
Four days after?
Five days after?
Six?
A week?
Two weeks?
Three weeks?

Nope, let's release it 22 days after the game.

Way to go, Rodger. Really owning up to it
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64468 posts
Posted on 2/11/19 at 4:28 pm to
While I do agree that the rule likely wasn't intended to change the result of a game due to an officiating error, I do wish he had addressed in his letter, or anywhere for that matter, what situation would actually fall under those powers vested to the commissioner. I think that would at least give some people closure on that issue rather than continuously see that rule cited.
Posted by RedPop4
Santiago de Compostela
Member since Jan 2005
14394 posts
Posted on 2/11/19 at 4:31 pm to
Well, the Super Bowl, the last event of the season, was a full 8 days ago, now. See? Roger Goodell is keeping the NFL Brand out there even after the season is over, getting more clicks and views with this one press release/press conference, whatever, on a Monday after a new football league had its opening weekend.

He saved this up for this date intentionally, in my meager opinion. Keeps the NFL buzz going for the entire off-season, even if it looks and comes across as incompetent.
Posted by LSUTIGER in TEXAS
Member since Jan 2008
13604 posts
Posted on 2/11/19 at 6:58 pm to
BUT WHERE IS HARRY CONNICK’S RESPONSE!!!!!!!,!!!
Posted by diat150
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2005
43462 posts
Posted on 2/11/19 at 7:03 pm to
All that needs to happen is that any penalty or non-penalty is challengable and coaches get 3 challenges per half instead of 2.
Posted by MikeD
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
7208 posts
Posted on 2/11/19 at 7:13 pm to
How about his last sentence typo...

quote:

Thank you for sharing your thoughts with me. I hope you will free to call if you would like to discuss this further.
Posted by bulldog95
North Louisiana
Member since Jan 2011
20698 posts
Posted on 2/11/19 at 8:10 pm to
I want to see the person in the replay booth talking to whoever and actually hear their reasoning behind an upheld or over turned call (AAF does this )

I do believe that in the last 5 minutes of a game a coach should be able to challenge a PI or helmet to helmet hit if the coach thinks the officials missed it. Once again the AAF has replay the last 5 minutes of a game for this.....
Posted by beatbammer
Member since Sep 2010
38002 posts
Posted on 2/11/19 at 8:27 pm to
Saints fans are the bleedingest vaginas in the fricking universe.
Posted by sparkinator
Lake Claiborne
Member since Dec 2007
4458 posts
Posted on 2/11/19 at 9:09 pm to
quote:


Has any Pro game ever been overturned in history over bad officiating?


Yes it has. And it was ‘fairly’ recent.

The pine tar game.

LINK

Let me clarify. It wasn’t overturned. It was replayed from the point of the officiating error and as a result, the outcome of the game changed.

Exactly what should have happened in the Saints/Rams game.

This post was edited on 2/11/19 at 9:23 pm
Posted by RiseUpATL
Member since Sep 2018
2214 posts
Posted on 2/11/19 at 9:45 pm to
Many reasons games are lost. Games never come down to one call. I think everyone agrees the call was blown.

However, Payton got cocky and rather than run the ball and usevthe clock he chose to pass three straight times (did Shanahan get in his ear?).

Then, another stroke of luck New Orleans won the coin toss in OT. The NFL is famous for the awful OT rules whereby the team that wins the coin toss generally wins the game. But what does NO do? Throw an INT. Game over.

NO still had chances to salt the game. It’s football. shite happens. Move on to the next play. Instead of acting like a head football coach Sean Payton melted down like kid who didn’t get the cereal he wanted in the cereal aisle at the local five and dime when he didn’t the call he planned on. His team never recovered. I believe it’s because that broke them and they allowed it.

Had they kept their focus, I believe that INT never gets thrown and they likely win. They allowed the refs to beat them on the no call and every play after that. Mentally soft. Matter of fact, part of me actually thinks the reason Payton threw it there rather than run the ball and kick the FG and burn precious time off the clock is because he thought he called a play where a PI would likely get called. Cocky as hell and he got burned. You live by the sword and you die by sword. Never put the game in the refs hands and I believe he did just that.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram