Started By
Message

re: GIFs of Final play: Pats/Panthers

Posted on 11/20/13 at 3:43 pm to
Posted by s_i5
Earth
Member since Jul 2004
2020 posts
Posted on 11/20/13 at 3:43 pm to
Gif the Pats final play against the Saints too.

The same experts who are crying for a penalty to give Brady another shot are the same people who said no penalty should have been called when it resulted in a Patriots TD that won the game.

Why is that?
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59689 posts
Posted on 11/20/13 at 3:47 pm to
Saints fans are still complaining about this??!?! If Carolina were 3-7 people would be happy that the call went the way it did. But since Carolina is on the Saints heels it's all of a sudden a conspiracy against the Saints?
Posted by s_i5
Earth
Member since Jul 2004
2020 posts
Posted on 11/20/13 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

Why am I not surprised that the first a-hole in this thread that clearly doesn't understand pass interference is a fricking Auburn fan?


He was just humping his leg and sniffing his arse.
Posted by s_i5
Earth
Member since Jul 2004
2020 posts
Posted on 11/20/13 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

Saints fans are still complaining about this??!?! If Carolina were 3-7 people would be happy that the call went the way it did. But since Carolina is on the Saints heels it's all of a sudden a conspiracy against the Saints?


We bring it back up because it was the Patriots. The one not called against the Patriots was very obvious. I'm still on the fence about the no call against Carolina.

I just can't figure out why the national sports media said no holding call because game shouldn't be decided by a penalty, and Galette might not have gotten to Brady anyway.

Yet, this time, the penalty should have been called to give Brady another shot, and it doesn't matter if he might not have been able to catch the ball.

No conspiracy, just facts.
Posted by beaver
The 755 Club
Member since Sep 2009
46861 posts
Posted on 11/20/13 at 3:59 pm to
Weren't saints fans claiming just weeks ago that the Pats get all the calls?
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59689 posts
Posted on 11/20/13 at 4:06 pm to
quote:


I just can't figure out why the national sports media said no holding call because game shouldn't be decided by a penalty, and Galette might not have gotten to Brady anyway.

Yet, this time, the penalty should have been called to give Brady another shot, and it doesn't matter if he might not have been able to catch the ball.


There is consistency in that the game shouldn't be decided by a penalty in either instance.
Posted by s_i5
Earth
Member since Jul 2004
2020 posts
Posted on 11/20/13 at 5:33 pm to


quote:

Weren't saints fans claiming just weeks ago that the Pats get all the calls?


Some were and Karma's a bitch to the Patriots now. My comments weren't about the NFL or refs siding with the Patriots, but the media's reaction, where many contradict themselves 100% in two very similar situations.

quote:

There is consistency in that the game shouldn't be decided by a penalty in either instance.


See above.

Generally I agree with your comments except when the foul is blatantly obvious and had a good chance of affecting the outcome of the play. Otherwise players would commit some serious fouls in those situations if they are never called.



Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112204 posts
Posted on 11/20/13 at 6:01 pm to
quote:

Some were and Karma's a bitch to the Patriots now


I thought karma was a bitch to the pats because of the jets game?


Jeez some of you are retarded
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 7Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram