- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Blazers reject trade offer of Lamarcus Aldridge for pick 1 and 19
Posted on 6/25/13 at 3:50 pm to papz
Posted on 6/25/13 at 3:50 pm to papz
quote:
and his numbers have trended downwards for the past handful of years
No they haven't. He was averaging 15 and 15 last season. His numbers have increased every year.
1
Posted on 6/25/13 at 4:41 pm to volfan30
Give me 1, 19, and next years 1st unprotected along with 2nd pick and we could possibly have a deal for Aldridge
Posted on 6/25/13 at 5:46 pm to TreyAnastasio
I thought it was obvious I was describing Danny Granger.
While that may be the case, as of right now, he's unsigned. And as it was mentioned before, a Granger/Varejo, the extra money freed up will help the cause. Addition by subtraction... the Pacers do not need Granger.
Seems to me you are vastly overrating Danny Granger if you think it's a "terrible" deal.
quote:
they'll re-sign west, so no
While that may be the case, as of right now, he's unsigned. And as it was mentioned before, a Granger/Varejo, the extra money freed up will help the cause. Addition by subtraction... the Pacers do not need Granger.
Seems to me you are vastly overrating Danny Granger if you think it's a "terrible" deal.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News