Started By
Message

Why did pensions go away?

Posted on 12/15/21 at 3:58 pm
Posted by bdavids09
Member since Jun 2017
624 posts
Posted on 12/15/21 at 3:58 pm
Was it just too expensive for companies or something else?
Posted by RTN
Member since Oct 2016
769 posts
Posted on 12/15/21 at 4:01 pm to
Pretty sure it was becoming really hard for most companies to fund their pension obligation. Lots of accounting/statistics behind all of that.
Posted by Huey Lewis
BR
Member since Oct 2013
4641 posts
Posted on 12/15/21 at 4:07 pm to
People don't stay at jobs for 30 years any more too so it's a noncompetitive benefit to offer compared to higher pay with no pension.
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
118778 posts
Posted on 12/15/21 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

Why did pensions go away?




Govt workers still get pensions. Why I have no idea, but they do. Also other retirement investment vehicles. Thank a taxpayer.
Posted by LSUcam7
FL
Member since Sep 2016
7895 posts
Posted on 12/15/21 at 4:15 pm to
When bond yields went to the floor, actuaries were caught with their pants around their ankles.

Rate of return expectations were too high and the promised cash flows were drowning pension heavy businesses.
This post was edited on 12/15/21 at 5:05 pm
Posted by RTN
Member since Oct 2016
769 posts
Posted on 12/15/21 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

Govt workers still get pensions


Just reminded me of how big of a ponzi scheme social security is. If they had to keep their obligation funded like the private sector there is no way it would survive.
Posted by AUHighPlainsDrifter
South Carolina
Member since Sep 2017
3072 posts
Posted on 12/15/21 at 4:16 pm to
yes
Posted by notbilly
alter
Member since Sep 2015
4324 posts
Posted on 12/15/21 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

Govt workers still get pensions.


Not nearly what it used to be. It was basically sliced in half in the 80's. Pre-Reagan, you could retire after 20 years and keep your benefits and about 40% of your income. Workers could max out their pension at 80% if they worked something like 42 years. Federal workers hired after that changes in the mid 80's have to be 57-ish to retire and have a certain amount of years under their belt. So the days of some 20 year old being hired and retiring at 40 are long gone. I'm certainly not arguing that it should be that way anymore. I'm pointing out that the retirement plan and benefits aren't as good as they were a few decades ago.
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
58069 posts
Posted on 12/15/21 at 4:50 pm to
I am getting a small modified pension when I retire.
As others have said it got to be too expensive for companies to fund them properly. My grandpa retired at 65 and they paid him his a monthly pension until he died at 92 years old
Posted by nuwaydawg
Member since Nov 2007
1916 posts
Posted on 12/15/21 at 4:53 pm to
Pensions/Healthcare were initially a way to ensure a stable and loyal workforce. Work hard and be rewarded when you are unable to work.

Enter advisors that are paid to advise corporate executives that there is way to increase earnings easily.

Pensions became IRA's and the Wall Street expansion began.

It's crazy out there. Hedges, puts, calls, insider information, speculation, government intervention (i.e. taxation) banker manipulation...

and the regular joe is prey. He doesn't stand a chance.

Why did pensions go away? Because there was money to be made.

Posted by go ta hell ole miss
Member since Jan 2007
13604 posts
Posted on 12/15/21 at 5:04 pm to
Retirees outgrowing the replacement work force. Increased life expectancy and retirement age that has stayed the same instead of increasing as well.
Posted by BestBanker
Member since Nov 2011
17473 posts
Posted on 12/15/21 at 5:08 pm to
Business and federal government created tax deferred plan in the 70s. Began the shift of the cost and risk of retirement to the employee. Also income tax rates were very high in that decade, so deferred income to higher earnings really meant something. As usual, expectation of the pols thinking wages would rise for the middle class to offset inflationary costs too. Who was in charge in the 70s? BTW, some smaller companies are using pensions again to attract and hold employees.

Eta: research the stock market values of the 70s for a correlating growth. Capitalism begins bigly.
This post was edited on 12/15/21 at 5:16 pm
Posted by CE Tiger
Metairie
Member since Jan 2008
41583 posts
Posted on 12/15/21 at 5:15 pm to
I’ll be getting a pension when it’s all said and done but it’s so damn confusing that I’m planning my retirement just through 401k and Roth . Pension will be a really really nice added bonus when the time comes.
Posted by BestBanker
Member since Nov 2011
17473 posts
Posted on 12/15/21 at 5:17 pm to
Your pension, SS, and personal savings might get you to 100% pre-retirement income.
Posted by beaverfever
Little Rock
Member since Jan 2008
32609 posts
Posted on 12/15/21 at 7:38 pm to
quote:

bond yields went to the floor
Posted by lynxcat
Member since Jan 2008
24118 posts
Posted on 12/15/21 at 8:46 pm to
Companies don’t want that liability on their books.

401K matching is defined contribution and predictable.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36102 posts
Posted on 12/15/21 at 8:49 pm to
Adding women to the full time workforce in the second half of the 20th century almost doubled the number of workers and halved the value of many types of labor. That in turn depressed salaries and reduced the benefits employers had to offer to attract and retain employees.

This is not a statement about whether women should be in the workplace. This is a comment about the effects of adding more labor supply to the workforce
Posted by thunderbird1100
GSU Eagles fan
Member since Oct 2007
68257 posts
Posted on 12/15/21 at 9:06 pm to
Managing own pension plan is way more administrative work and $ for a company, having a 3rd party do your 401k and company provide a small match (typically) is just much cheaper and easier for companies. That's why it got popular.

1 nice advantage to 401k is if company went bankrupt your pension could be potentially be in trouble, but 401k is yours. Also, to an extent, you choose the investments vs. a pension plan.
This post was edited on 12/15/21 at 9:08 pm
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84582 posts
Posted on 12/15/21 at 10:05 pm to
quote:

Was it just too expensive for companies


Imagine promising to pay someone, for life, 80% of their highest 3 years of income 40 years from now. Think of that math and risk, and tell me if just putting 6% of their income into a 401k sounds like a better deal.
Posted by FLObserver
Jacksonville
Member since Nov 2005
14426 posts
Posted on 12/16/21 at 6:15 am to
quote:

Imagine promising to pay someone, for life, 80% of their highest 3 years of income 40 years from now.


And this is passed to the younger generations to pick up the slack for stupid decisions made before they were even born.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram