Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Real estate sales

Posted on 6/7/18 at 5:31 am
Posted by JBM210
Member since Dec 2010
3192 posts
Posted on 6/7/18 at 5:31 am
What's the boards opinion on if the current climate in BR, Ascension, and Livingston is doing average, below average or above average as far as home sales right now. I see new subdivisions popping up everywhere and plenty of existing home on the market, but are they moving?
Posted by lsufan1971
Zachary
Member since Nov 2003
18111 posts
Posted on 6/7/18 at 6:31 am to
I put my house up for sale in May in Zachary. Had a contract in 8 days. I didn’t get listing price but got close.

People want move in ready for the most part. My house is 4 years old in Beaver Creek on a GC. Houses that sit over others it’s because or price and/or it needs work/updating.
This post was edited on 6/7/18 at 6:35 am
Posted by LSU1018
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2007
7215 posts
Posted on 6/7/18 at 7:07 am to
It's pretty flat year over year. Summer time is always going to be busier.
Posted by MrJimBeam
Member since Apr 2009
12253 posts
Posted on 6/7/18 at 7:12 am to
Spring and Summer are always a little busier with tax returns and moving with kids after a school year in the summer.

I'm curious if anyone else has run into properties that are now in a flood zone that weren't before in the BR area. More south BR/BR proper.
Posted by Paul Allen
Montauk, NY
Member since Nov 2007
75130 posts
Posted on 6/7/18 at 8:19 am to
Good question. Most people say if you didn’t flood in 2016, especially in Ascension and Livingston, your home value increased. Not sure about percentages or specifics though.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
84943 posts
Posted on 6/7/18 at 9:58 am to
quote:

Most people say if you didn’t flood in 2016, especially in Ascension and Livingston, your home value increased. Not sure about percentages or specifics though
It depends on house to house and neighborhood to neighborhood. Some places saw 15 year old homes get a few feet of water while up the street got nothing. The homes that flooded and renovated are getting more more than the homes that didn't because of the updates especially if they're not in a flood zone.
Posted by Paul Allen
Montauk, NY
Member since Nov 2007
75130 posts
Posted on 6/7/18 at 10:00 am to
What about existing homes 10-20 years old, in non flood zones that didn’t flood? I would imagine they saw a large increase too.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
84943 posts
Posted on 6/7/18 at 10:13 am to
quote:

What about existing homes 10-20 years old, in non flood zones that didn’t flood? I would imagine they saw a large increase too.
It really does depend on the home and neighborhood. If they're around renovated homes of the same age, then possibly not. If its a track-home neighborhood, then even less likely. The market in general is steady so they'll be worth more than before the flood but not really a large increase.
Posted by Paul Allen
Montauk, NY
Member since Nov 2007
75130 posts
Posted on 6/7/18 at 12:15 pm to
You’d think after the historic floods of 2016 that homes that didn’t flood would have exponentially increased in value. Maybe it’s not like Katrina where home values in BR and other areas increased overnight.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
84943 posts
Posted on 6/7/18 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

historic floods of 2016
What's most interesting is how/why many places flooded. According to flood maps, water should have begun rising from the southeast of my home. But because most of the rain was to the northwest, the creek that flows by our neighborhood rose initially in such a way that brought water directly from the north thanks in part to the blocking of flow under bridges. Had the rain been to the southeast of us, an entirely different section of the homes would flood and I would likely have gotten half the water I did or possibly none at all.

Meaning that in some cases the likelihood of a home not in a flood zone flooding isn't necessarily less than a home that did flood. More simply: There were homes in our neighborhood in AE that did not flood, while I was in X and did flood. Had the rain fallen elsewhere, it would have been reversed.

There are two things at play here: 1) So many in LP flooded that the choices of those that didn't is really low. 2) Most people seem to be completely satisfied with a good renovation with the understanding that 3' of rain in 72 hours is rare and that it would flood almost any location on earth.

I'll say this. New construction after the flood and built up is expensive af.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram